Many thanks for this explanation!
On 08/24/2018 03:04 AM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 23:17:29 +0300, you wrote:
Hi,
The Threadripper discussion has been very interesting.
Will these adjustments to NUMA for Threadripper's topography also apply to Epyc
also? Or will more
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 23:17:29 +0300, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The Threadripper discussion has been very interesting.
>
>Will these adjustments to NUMA for Threadripper's topography also apply to
>Epyc also? Or will more nuanced work need to be done once an Epyc system
>becomes available?
Epyc doesn't
Hi,
The Threadripper discussion has been very interesting.
Will these adjustments to NUMA for Threadripper's topography also apply to Epyc
also? Or will more nuanced work need to be done once an Epyc system becomes
available?
M
On 08/20/2018 09:05 AM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
It will depend
It will depend on the frequency of the interconnect as well. I think the
idle power use comes out in my tests too... idle power consumption is
around 83W with the fabric running at 2800 or 3000 MHz, and 65W when
running at 2666 MHz or slower. At idle the cpu frequency is at the same
relative low
Apparently there are some special cpu registers you can read to get power
used by some components, probably not highly accurate but likely indicative.
Anandtech's review (
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13124/the-amd-threadripper-2990wx-and-2950x-review/4
) covered some of this, they found the
