[libreoffice-users] writer table bug?

2013-01-02 Thread Walther Koehler
Hallo and a happy New Year to all, especially for the developers of LO, and good health to them, so that they can keep up with their marvellous work. Debian Lenny, KDE, LO 3.5.5.3 (and earlier versions) I encountered a reproducible error using LO-writer table: Take a simple 4x4 writer table

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base scenario

2013-01-02 Thread Alex Thurgood
On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Ian Whitfield wrote: Hi Ian, So all I need now is for the Sub-Form to AUTOMATICALLY pick-up the Members ID from the main Form and to use as the filter criteria for which eMails to show. (I will also use this form to enter new eMails so the automatic pick-up of the

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base date entry less flexible

2013-01-02 Thread Alex Thurgood
On 01/01/2013 09:19 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote: Hi Girvin, The point I was trying to make was that when I forget and use dashes, this particular error message was not very informative and I, for one, would like to see more diagnostic information in the Java exception error dialog so I could

Re: [libreoffice-users] libreoffice slow to delete sheets and slow in general

2013-01-02 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) In previous cases i think it's usually turned out to be a corrupted file.  1.  So, can you create a copy of the file as it is so that if anything else goes wrong with it then at least you have this new back-up?  2.  Are there older versions of the file that you can go back to?  3.  Are

[libreoffice-users] Re: Keyboard Shortcuts for Buttons in Base

2013-01-02 Thread Alex Thurgood
On 12/30/2012 02:22 AM, Marion Noel Lodge wrote: Hi, My question is, can the same thing be achieved with a button in a Base Form? In Paradox for example, typing 'Choose Regular Entry' as the button's label, results in 'Choose *R*egular Entry' being displayed on the button. However '' does not

[libreoffice-users] Update the website

2013-01-02 Thread C. H. D.
Hi, I think the following page should be updated: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?type=win-x86lang=en-USversion=4.0.0 Download LibreOffice This is a pre-release version not meant for general use. LibreOffice Windows, version 4.0.0, English (US). Not the version you wanted? Change

RE: [libreoffice-users] Update the website

2013-01-02 Thread V Stuart Foote
Thanks, reported to Web maintainers as: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58948 Incorrect text aside, preferred download link probably would be http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ Stuart From: C. H. D.

[libreoffice-users] Re: Update the website

2013-01-02 Thread Pedro
In addition to the fact that it is NOT version 3.6.0 it should be written in BIG LETTERS that this is a BETA build! It's not even a Release Candidate!!! The list should show 4.0.0Beta2 And the download page should say LibreOffice Windows, version 4.0.0 Beta 2, English (US) -- View this

[libreoffice-users] Re: Update the website

2013-01-02 Thread Pedro
Mirosław Zalewski wrote No, it should not. To get to this page you must go through http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?type=win-x86lang=en-US which clearly states that 4.0.0 is not finished yet. There is no need to say it again right on next page. We can assume that users are

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Update the website

2013-01-02 Thread Mirosław Zalewski
On 02/01/2013 at 16:45, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Pre-releases Below, you can download a pre-release of the next version of LibreOffice for evaluation, QA testing, etc. These versions are not meant for general use. It does not say that the currently available build is a BETA But

[libreoffice-users] Re: Update the website

2013-01-02 Thread Pedro
Tanstaafl wrote It says 'Pre-releases', not 'Release Candidates'... A pre-release (think 'Alpha' releases) can be even more buggy/error prone than a BETA... -snip- It is very relevant, but you have to understand the terms for the context. You are complaining because you apparently

Re: [libreoffice-users] Base date entry less flexible

2013-01-02 Thread Dan Lewis
On 12/29/2012 07:46 PM, Dan Lewis wrote: On 12/29/2012 03:28 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote: Greetings, I noted that after I updated LO from 3.5.7 to 3.6.4, the Base date entry format flexibility has changed. With a 3.5.7 (and before) Base form, I could enter 12-29-12 and it would be changed to

Re: [libreoffice-users] Update the website

2013-01-02 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Lol, that was a better move than me.  I just copied the thread to the websites list where it could just vanish into the ether, even if i didn't mess up the name of the list this time.  Regards from Tom :)  From: V Stuart Foote