@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice Project
On 11/3/13 6:49 PM, jonathon wrote:
On 11/03/2013 04:32 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Using a feature by feature comparison, there is no way LO or Kingsoft is
serious competition for Office Pro.
A point you
Hello Ken,
Le Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:07:57 -0600,
Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com a écrit :
On 11/2/13 3:48 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:59:33 +,
e-letter inp...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 01/11/2013, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi Ken,
Let's start with some general points to start with. First, the user.
For most home users, who probably are not as experienced or
knowledgeable of Word and LO as you and I, the advanced features are
not needed. So something simpler to use, like Kingsoft Office Free,
are more
Good morning, Charles,
On 11/3/13 5:29 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello Ken,
Le Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:07:57 -0600,
Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com a écrit :
On 11/2/13 3:48 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:59:33 +,
e-letter inp...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 01/11/2013,
On 11/03/2013 12:56 PM, Paul wrote:
For something more specific:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44871
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Working around these issues creates more work for the user than doing
the same things in Word. Would you switch
Charles-H. Schulz:
Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project discussed the need for us to understand how we could enroll
regular users (whatever that means) to the LibreOffice project.
The LO project is suffering from rock star syndrome: through all those years
there is a bunch of
jonathon:
That must be a reference to the fact that the mean time between starting
MSO on Windows, and seeing the Blue Screen of Death is under sixty
seconds.
/yawn
Or maybe it is a reference to the fact that MSO 2013 is so completely,
utterly, and absolutely incompatible with MSO 2013,
FUD
On 11/3/13 5:56 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi Ken,
Let's start with some general points to start with. First, the user.
For most home users, who probably are not as experienced or
knowledgeable of Word and LO as you and I, the advanced features are
not needed. So something simpler to use, like
On 11/3/13 9:05 AM, Urmas wrote:
Charles-H. Schulz:
Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project discussed the need for us to understand how we could enroll
regular users (whatever that means) to the LibreOffice project.
Just FYI here, I would consider regular users those who still
Sure, LO does not have as many modules as the professional version of
MSO. That said, since there are already FOSS packages to do many of
those missing modules, why should LO have their developers work on
those as well as the basic office suite modules?
Word --LO Writer
Hi,
Am 03.11.2013 18:36, schrieb Kracked_P_P---webmaster:
Access --LO Base
Base does not replace Access and it´s not meant to do so.
;-)
Stefan
--
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
To shorten up this message, I've deleted all but Kracked's reply.
On 11/3/13 10:36 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Sure, LO does not have as many modules as the professional version of
MSO. That said, since there are already FOSS packages to do many of
those missing modules, why should LO
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:14:08PM +0700, Urmas wrote:
jonathon:
That must be a reference to the fact that the mean time between starting
MSO on Windows, and seeing the Blue Screen of Death is under sixty
seconds.
/yawn
Or maybe it is a reference to the fact that MSO 2013 is so
Hi Ken,
Before you can say any program *is* serious competition, you have to
determine which products, or product levels, you are going to
compare. Office is available in many forms, similar to the different
levels of comfort/convenience packages in automobiles. LO comes in
just one
Hi, Paul,
On 11/3/13 1:53 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi Ken,
Before you can say any program *is* serious competition, you have to
determine which products, or product levels, you are going to
compare. Office is available in many forms, similar to the different
levels of comfort/convenience packages in
On 11/03/2013 06:53 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
FUD and absurd statements will take LO nowhere.
FUD you say? Pot meet kettle.
What he does not want to admit is that I am speaking from personal
experience.
jonathon
* English - detected
* English
* English
javascript:void(0);
--
On 11/03/2013 06:32 PM, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Access --LO Base
Base does not replace Access and it´s not meant to do so.
The dBase 3 clone was not removed when Base was added to LO.
I reinstalled LO and AOO earlier this week. When doing my usual
customizations, I noticed that
On 11/03/2013 04:32 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Using a feature by feature comparison, there is no way LO or Kingsoft is
serious competition for Office Pro.
A point you are missing, is that even in a corporate environment, all of
the parts offered by MSO Pro are not needed by all of the employees
On 11/3/13 6:49 PM, jonathon wrote:
On 11/03/2013 04:32 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
Using a feature by feature comparison, there is no way LO or Kingsoft is
serious competition for Office Pro.
A point you are missing, is that even in a corporate environment, all of
the parts offered by MSO Pro
On 11/2/13 3:48 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:59:33 +,
e-letter inp...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 01/11/2013, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
But when we come to think of it, these people started somewhere, one
day, to contribute, and while
Hi Ken,
I'd like to see some serious competition for MS Office,
but there appears to be none, either open source or commercial.
Why do you say there is no serious competition to MS Office?
Personally, I find LO to be slightly easier to use than MS Office
(although the difference is negligible,
Hi, Paul,
On 11/2/13 4:23 PM, Paul wrote:
Hi Ken,
I'd like to see some serious competition for MS Office,
but there appears to be none, either open source or commercial.
Why do you say there is no serious competition to MS Office?
Personally, I find LO to be slightly easier to use than MS
On 11/1/13 7:04 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello everyone,
Thank you for choosing and using LibreOffice!
My name is Charles-H. Schulz and I'm one of the co-founders of the
Document Foundation. Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project discussed the need for us to understand how
On 11/1/2013 2:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/1/13 7:04 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello everyone,
Thank you for choosing and using LibreOffice!
My name is Charles-H. Schulz and I'm one of the co-founders of the
Document Foundation. Many people who contribute to the LibreOffice
project
*ditto*
-Original Message-
From: Dale Erwin [mailto:d...@casaerwin.org]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 6:04 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice
Project
On 11/1/2013 2:05 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 11/1/13 7:04 AM
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 5:11:40 PM
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging Users in the LibreOffice Project
*ditto*
-Original Message-
From: Dale Erwin [mailto:d...@casaerwin.org]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 6:04 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re
26 matches
Mail list logo
