Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 7.0 fails to start with --nologo

2020-09-05 Thread MR ZenWiz
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 8:05 AM Stephan Bergmann wrote: > : > soffice is a shell script that tries to determine its location in the > file system, so that it can call other executables like oosplash and > javaldx next to itself. See the section labelled with a "resolve > installation directory"

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 7.0 fails to start with --nologo

2020-09-05 Thread Stephan Bergmann
[Please do not turn this into a private conversation by dropping the mailing list; added it back now] On 04/09/2020 20:05, MR ZenWiz wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:35 PM Stephan Bergmann wrote: What looks suspicious with the original post is that they have a /usr/bin/libreoffice, which is

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 7.0 fails to start with --nologo

2020-09-04 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 04/09/2020 07:53, Luuk wrote: On 3-9-2020 18:48, MR ZenWiz wrote: I saw this error when I tried to start LO 7.0 Calc from the command line: $ /usr/bin/libreoffice --calc --nologo /usr/bin/libreoffice: 191: exec: /usr/bin/oosplash: not found I located oosplash and symlinked it to /usr/bin

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 7.0 fails to start with --nologo

2020-09-04 Thread Luuk
On 3-9-2020 18:48, MR ZenWiz wrote: I saw this error when I tried to start LO 7.0 Calc from the command line: $ /usr/bin/libreoffice --calc --nologo /usr/bin/libreoffice: 191: exec: /usr/bin/oosplash: not found I located oosplash and symlinked it to /usr/bin and got this: $ sudo ln -s

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 7.0 fails to start with --nologo

2020-09-03 Thread Luuk
On 3-9-2020 18:48, MR ZenWiz wrote: I saw this error when I tried to start LO 7.0 Calc from the command line: $ /usr/bin/libreoffice --calc --nologo /usr/bin/libreoffice: 191: exec: /usr/bin/oosplash: not found I located oosplash and symlinked it to /usr/bin and got this: I think oosplash