Re: GroovyFX - Custom UI widget/component

> Thank you very much Dierk. if you could make an example, that'll be GREAT. > thanks so much! > > > > From: Dierk König <dierk.koe...@canoo.com> > To: users@groovy.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 4:18 AM > Subject: Re: GroovyFX - Custom UI w

Re: [VOTE]About the Union Type for method/constructor declaration

Union types (Sum types, really) shine when used with pattern matching and exhaustion check. This is not provided by this proposal. Without that, there are already a number of ways to encode them in Groovy. -1 Dierk sent from:mobile > Am 23.07.2017 um 02:13 schrieb MG :

Re: Groovy Champions proposal feedback

I’m all for honoring contributions to the language/ecosystem/community. Given our logo, „Groovy Star“ comes to mind :-) Cheers Dierk sent from:mobile > Am 13.02.2018 um 12:29 schrieb Paolo Di Tommaso : > > It sound a nice idea also to promote the visibility of the

Re: Groov 3.0 - nested code blocks - block/eval

I’m against breaking changes and changing core concepts for so little gain. Groovy has (x) to make x an expression. We could make that lexically scoped. Dierk sent from:mobile > Am 21.03.2018 um 01:53 schrieb MG : > > Hi Daniel, > >> On 21.03.2018 01:33, Daniel Sun

Re: Vote for Groovy 3 support in IntelliJ :-)

Done. Dierk sent from:mobile > Am 17.03.2018 um 06:52 schrieb Edgar Harutyunyan : > > done > >> On 03/16/2018 09:20 PM, MG wrote: >> 40 votes to date - great job everyone... :-) >> Cheers, >> mg >> >> >>> On 16.03.2018 09:18, Edd Grant wrote: >>> Also done! >>>