On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:50 +0100, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> An alternative is to "archive" the project in GitHub. It's going to be
> read-only (see the "settings" tab).
>
Gant organisation now with two owners not one, and the two repositories
archived as proposed.
--
Russel.
===
+1 to archiving it. I am happy for you to add my name as a maintainer if
that helps.
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:29 PM Russel Winder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Way back in 2006, Gant was an experiment in scheduling Ant tasks and
> attempted
> to be a build system. Hans Dockter experiment a lot with it, but i
An alternative is to "archive" the project in GitHub. It's going to be
read-only (see the "settings" tab).
Le sam. 2 févr. 2019 à 09:46, Russel Winder a écrit :
> On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:18 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> > Why deleting it?
> > Keep it for posterity! :-)
>
> Someone, or some
On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:18 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> Why deleting it?
> Keep it for posterity! :-)
Someone, or some people, then needs to step up and volunteer to be an owner of
the Gant organisation on GitHub.
--
Russel.
===
Dr Russel Winder
Why deleting it?
Keep it for posterity! :-)
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 8:29 AM Russel Winder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Way back in 2006, Gant was an experiment in scheduling Ant tasks and
> attempted
> to be a build system. Hans Dockter experiment a lot with it, but in the end
> Gant was not the way forward
