etings and thank you very much for your time.
>
>
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "Lorenz B."
> Para: users@jena.apache.org
> Enviados: Lunes, 20 de Marzo 2017 2:24:33
> Asunto: Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: about TDB JENA
>
>
> It totally depends on the reasoning th
0 de Marzo 2017 2:24:33
Asunto: Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: about TDB JENA
It totally depends on the reasoning that you want to apply. OWL 2 DL is
not possible via simple rules, but for instance RDFS/OLW Horst and OWL
RL can be doen via rule-based materialization.
> I keep going into details, thank
misano, an excellent researcher and connoisseur of
> the framework OWLAPI. With which I have been exchanging on this subject.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "Dave Reynolds"
> Para: users@jena.apache.org
> Enviados: Domingo, 19 de Marzo 2
ich I have been exchanging on this subject.
Best regards.
- Mensaje original -
De: "Dave Reynolds"
Para: users@jena.apache.org
Enviados: Domingo, 19 de Marzo 2017 13:45:48
Asunto: Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: about TDB JENA
On 19/03/17 15:52, Manuel Enrique Puebla Martinez wrote:
>
>
Just a side note; Jena offers SPARQL 1.1, which includes property paths [1]. In
some situations, they can be used to do some forms of inference (e.g. some
kinds of problems involving subsumption) right in your SPARQL queries.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
[1] https://www.w3.o
On 19/03/17 15:52, Manuel Enrique Puebla Martinez wrote:
I consider that I did not know how to explain correctly in my previous email, I
repeat the two questions:
1) I read the page https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/assembler.html, I
do not think it is what I need.
I work with la
I consider that I did not know how to explain correctly in my previous email, I
repeat the two questions:
1) I read the page https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/assembler.html, I
do not think it is what I need.
I work with large OWL2 ontologies from the OWLAPI framework, generated
a
