> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 um 10:43 Uhr
> Von: "Martijn Brinkers"
> An: users@lists.djigzo.com
> Betreff: Re: [Djigzo users] Problem after java-Update in CentOS 6
>
> On 05/17/2016 06:16 PM, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
> > On 05/17/2016 06:02 PM, fatcha...@gmx.de
On 05/18/2016 11:37 AM, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote:
>
>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 um 10:43 Uhr Von: "Martijn
>> Brinkers" An: users@lists.djigzo.com
>> Betreff: Re: [Djigzo users] Problem after java-Update in CentOS 6
>>
>> On 05/17/2016 06:16 PM, Martijn
Hello,
we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027
needed for this release an i wonder why it is needed. Should mail
injected there be passed through the djigzo gateway (again)? If yes,
why not
On 05/18/2016 11:37 AM, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote:
>
>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 um 10:43 Uhr Von: "Martijn
>> Brinkers" An: users@lists.djigzo.com
>> Betreff: Re: [Djigzo users] Problem after java-Update in CentOS 6
>>
>> On 05/17/2016 06:16 PM, Martijn
On 05/17/2016 06:16 PM, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 06:02 PM, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hi, I`m using a ciphermail on a CentOS 6 fully patched and it worked
>> fine for quite a while, but after an update to
>> java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.39-1.13.11.0.el6_7.x86_64 today, I found
>> this
On 05/18/2016 04:13 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Martijn Brinkers :
>
>> On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
>>> releases. The upgrade guide list a
On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
> releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027
> needed for this release an i wonder why it is needed. Should mail
> injected there be
Zitat von Martijn Brinkers :
On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Hello,
we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
releases. The upgrade guide list a additional injection port 10027
needed for this release an i wonder why it
On 05/18/2016 04:13 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Martijn Brinkers :
>
>> On 05/18/2016 03:33 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we are on the way from Djigzo 2.10.0-3 to 3.0.5 mostly to keep up with
>>> releases. The upgrade guide list a