On 19 May 2010 06:52, Dennis Mattingly wrote:
> - NVIDIA binary driver
You lost developer interest right there.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://f
On 29 May 2010 03:11, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Otherwise, packagekit will apparently spend some
> indeterminate amount of time trying to help you
> out by finding what package defines that command.
There's also loads of stuff to tweak in /etc/PackageKit/CommandNotFound.conf
Richard.
--
users mailin
On 3 June 2010 02:05, Yogesh wrote:
> I installed fnfx after reading about it in some forum.
FnFx is obsolete now. All the events should come up using INPUT from
the kernel. This means they either just work, or you can assign them
actions in the keybinding caplet.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
On 12 June 2010 10:07, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> My problem seems to come from the Nvidia proprietary drivers. When i
> uninstall it and go back to nouveau, the hibernate and resume works
> fine.
Bzzzt. You just lost developer interest.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On 1 July 2010 19:49, Frank Murphy wrote:
> then try removing packagekit-media.repo
I've got a PackageKit fix in the works. I'll write some code to fix
this tomorrow.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedora
On 1 July 2010 22:09, JD wrote:
> Maybe that's not the optimal answer, but it works for now until fedora
> fixes the problem.
commit cf508c479a4579f4552770f467da0a04480ba733
Author: Richard Hughes
Date: Fri Jul 2 11:49:51 2010 +0100
Add a long document explaining the
On 10 February 2010 02:00, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What exactly is the status of tp_smapi for Fedora-12?
> Is it available in some repository?
It needs to be pushed upstream to kernel.org
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 23 February 2010 21:17, Les wrote:
> PackageKit seems to have hung. I know there are 31 updates for F12,
> but I don't seem to be able to get PackageKit to do the job, nor can I
> abort and clean, since it seems to have the lock file hung for anything
> to do with the update or yum proc
On 24 March 2010 23:20, Michael Miles wrote:
> How to fix?
Downgrade yum. The yum API changed.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/
2010/4/2 Tanguy Eric :
> I would like to know how to enable a proxy for packagekit. I know I can use
> proxy in yum.conf but is it possible to use proxy server in gnome
> preferences ?
Yup, just set the proxy in System->Preferences->Network Proxy, or edit
/etc/PackageKit/PackageKit.conf if you wan
On 12 April 2010 11:07, Roger wrote:
> Where yum takes a few minute at most, Add/Remove can frequently take
> 15-20 minutes then fail.
We've fixed a speed problem with the front-end in the latest
PackageKit update. It's certainly wasn't designed to take that long,
but it was just a bug.
Richard.
On 16 April 2010 22:35, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Hmmm, I'd call that a work-around, not a solution. The solution is for
> gpk (in fact, all GUI-based stuff) to query the NICs via something like
>
> ip link show up | egrep "(eth.:|wlan.:)"
>
> and see if any network link is up. Or scan /proc/
On 2 June 2011 12:35, Chris Tyler wrote:
> - If pk-c-n-f times out on fetching file list metadata, it seems to
> silently stop trying to suggest packages. I've seen this on slow
> connections and disconnected machines. IIRC, fetching recent metadata
> (e.g., by using yum to find a file-level depen
On 3 June 2011 12:55, Javier Perez wrote:
> D [03/Jun/2011:06:50:25 -0500] Loading printer Canon_IP3000...
> D [03/Jun/2011:06:50:25 -0500] load_ppd: Loading
> /var/cache/cups/Canon_IP3000.ipp4...
> D [03/Jun/2011:06:50:25 -0500] Calling DeleteDevice(cups-Canon_IP3000)
So it's deleting the colord
On 6 June 2011 03:57, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It really isn't. It is just a workaround that produces inconsistent
> behaviour for reasons that are not clear or documented. The right fix
> would be to find out why yum doesn't work off the cache when told to and
> solve that problem but this worka
On 17 June 2011 22:14, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I like others noticed that the automatic yum updating seems to be
> missing in FC15. Well I did a yum update which installed 66 rpms among
> them several PackageKit related rpms. Automates yum updating may be upon
> us. We will see.
Only security upda
On 20 June 2011 16:46, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> Only security updates get automatically installed by default.
> Why is this? And do you mean they get installed without asking first?
Look at the "software updates" configuration utility.
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 22 June 2011 10:02, Dario Lesca wrote:
> How to disable automatic update on Fedora 15?
Type gpk-prefs into a terminal.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines
On 30 June 2011 14:38, Rex Dieter wrote:
> support for that was removed from kde in... 4.5 I believe... , as that was
> an old feature of hal (that fedora purposesly removed from it's hal
> packaging even earlier).
See http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/power/good_practices.html
Richard
--
users ma
On 1 September 2011 21:29, Digimer wrote:
> Also, Linux is all about choice.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg00861.html
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 5 September 2011 18:24, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I agree, there are a lot of us that would like to extend F14.
This is impossible. Developers are already working at 100% just to try
and get F16 out of the door. If they have spare time, they try to do
F15 updates at the same time. I personally
On 16 September 2011 17:52, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I thought I would remove Plymouth since I don't use the graphic
> log-in but I'm not sure about the "dracut" it will take out.
Removing dracut isn't a good move if you ever want to upgrade the
kernel. You can remove the rhgb from the
On 28 July 2010 12:56, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Noone can be bribed. When the code is ready, it will be integrated. If
> you have questions, feel free to ask the developer in question directly.
Well, the code is pretty ready. I just need a infrastructure team that
are willing to help me deploy t
On 31 August 2010 05:26, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
> failed to install signature: Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py", line 2926,
> in install_signature
> self.yumbase.getKeyForPackage(pkg, askcb = lambda x, y, z: True)
> File "/usr/lib/pytho
On 1 September 2010 11:26, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> I've tried hard not to turn it off in F13 and F14 Branched, so I could
> test it, … but it is just plain annoying to see it fail due to a broken
> dependency and then refuse to remove itself from the notification area.
> That's too much of a dis
On 1 September 2010 12:08, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Then I could return to running "yum -y update --skip-broken" instead of
> letting an autostarted desktop app be "more convenient". Right?
Up to you.
>> Also, you forgot to point to bugzillas in your email.
>
> There is no bugzilla ticket about
On 11 October 2010 02:43, Joel Rees wrote:
> If the power manager doesn't recognize your power management hardware,
> that's pretty much the correct behavior. And then you have to manually
> shut it down.
You probably want to send your dsdt to the linux-acpi mailing list,
and asking for help. Thi
On 18 October 2010 19:48, Dan Thurman wrote:
> Since last week, I was using PackageKit updates
> until I noticed PackageKit became KPackageKit
> by surprise.
Well, PackageKit is the daemon that actually does all the processing.
What I think you mean is that KPackageKit (the KDE frontend for
pack
On 14 March 2011 16:11, fedora wrote:
> HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) is part of udev. You find its config
> files in /etc/udev/rules.d/
I'm not sure any of that statement is correct, sorry.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription op
On 27 May 2011 06:51, antonio wrote:
> Up to Fedora 14 I had a graphical repo management tool installed
> (Gpk-repo I assume), after update to Fedora 15 such a tool is missing
> (only applet is available, but not working).
It got rolled into gpk-prefs -- hope that helps.
Richard.
--
users maili
On 19 October 2010 23:35, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> After I relocated the monitor, and attached a 35' long VGA cable...
As an electrical engineer, this statement has alarm bells ringing :-)
I think you're better off with a DVI cable in this instance.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.f
On 3 November 2010 18:05, Colin Brace wrote:
> Any ideas on what might have happened here? Surely this useful applet is
> still part of Gnome?? This file is now gone:
> /usr/libexec/gnome-brightness-applet
This has been removed upstream in readiness for the GNOME 3 interface changes.
Richard.
-
On 3 November 2010 17:33, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Nicely done!
Thanks. It's going to be even slicker in Fedora 15:
http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2010/11/03/preupgrade-meet-packagekit/
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 3 November 2010 20:39, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 11/03/2010 12:05 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> Thanks. It's going to be even slicker in Fedora 15:
>> http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2010/11/03/preupgrade-meet-packagekit/
>>
>> Richard.
>
> Is that kind o
On 4 November 2010 20:16, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
> If my memory serves me correctly, there is an extra program for
> packagekit what could create servicepacks - and I thought that could
> be the one what helps me out. But I didn't founded the package.
Yup, you want to use the service pack creator.
On 21 November 2010 20:40, Beartooth wrote:
> Surely there must be some way to tell Fedora to take note of what
> I have, where I put it, and how I use it, then put it all into a file I
> can copy to a USB stick or some such medium -- so that once the install
> completes, I can give the sti
On 12 January 2011 01:23, Chris Smart
> PackageKit however, fails to work with the proxy set. If we turn the
> proxy settings off, then it works (as expected). To me, that means
> it's not respecting the no_proxy variables, unlike Yum.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on how to tell it to, or how to
On 9 January 2011 18:26, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> my .xsession-errors file is 14157 lines long of which 13571 lines are
> debug messages from gpk-update-icon.
Yes, apologies. I've fixed this in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668303 by limiting the low
level debugging.
I'm also not su
On 9 January 2011 19:51, john wendel wrote:
> "yum remove PackageKit" worked for me.
In the same way that setting fire to my car made the squeaky seat
problem go away.
Please don't tell people to just remove PackageKit, it's not terribly
useful, and if they don't know what they are doing then th
2010/1/15 Marcus D. Leech :
> I'm getting this message on a freshly-installed-from-live-cd system for
> F12 today:
>
> Error Type:
> Error Value: Error getting repository data for installed, repository not
> found
> File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 3125, in
Just do (
2010/1/15 Chris Smart :
> Not that I'm questioning your understanding, but if yum is throwing
> errors, will this actually work? Might he have to install the rpm's
> directly from a mirror first?
PackageKit uses the yum API in a different way to the yum command line tool.
Richard.
--
users maili
On 21 January 2014 10:07, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Is there some specific reason this needs to be cross-posted to three
> different lists (none of which is the Testing list)? Presumably those
> using dnf will get the update anyway.
It seems to me, Ales is damned if he does publicize the relea
On 6 April 2014 17:21, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I see this message in /var/log/messages over.. and over... and over. I
> saw a red hat bugzilla forum from fedora 15 on up talking about this
> with no resolution.. Is there a resolution??
PackageKit is system activated and quits when not being used
On 9 June 2014 15:41, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 1. Is there a yum compatibility test suite? It dnf is supposed to be a
> drop-in replacement, not having one would seem grossly silly and should be
> treated as "full stop show stopper".
From someone that's had to work with the yum API in the past, I
On 9 June 2014 23:17, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> major distributions. (I'm rather surprised the MATE folks haven't
> forked gnome-packagekit already...)
I don't think they need to, I'm still maintaining gnome-packagekit for
people not wanting (or who can't) run gnome-software.
Richard
--
user
Hi all,
For the LVFS project, I need vendors making hardware to submit
firmware files with carefully written metadata so that they can be
downloaded in Fedora 23 securely and automatically. I also need those
vendors to either use a standardized flashing protocol (e.g. DFU or
UEFI) or to open the d
On 16 September 2015 at 18:46, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Never was sure why; I thought that's what packagekitd was *for*.
PackageKit needs to offer clients results with guaranteed latencies;
it's no good if the command-not-found handler takes 700ms to return
results, or gnome-software takes 15 seco
On 24 October 2015 at 06:57, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Where does packageKit keep its log
It should all be in the systemd journal.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
F
On 19 April 2016 at 09:49, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What term will now be used for the passage to Fedora-24?
At least in gnome-software, PackageKit and libhif we use "update" for
update-to-new-versions-same-release and "upgrade" for
update-to-new-versions-in-new-release.
Richard
--
users mailing
Update fwupd. There is a DFU issue we only recently found and fixed. Richard
On 29 Jun 2016 19:06, "stan" wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:59:29 -
> "Matthew Colton" wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > as the subject says my sound card stopped working after the update to
> > F24. The sound card worked
On 30 June 2016 at 06:57, Matthew Colton wrote:
> Update fwupd. There is a DFU issue we only recently found and fixed. Richard
Sorry for the short response, I was on mobile and too tired to find a
laptop. See https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/issues/50 for the
upstream bug.
> Do you mean updating
On 30 June 2016 at 08:37, Richard Hughes wrote:
> You can get it from koji; I forgot to do the f24 build:
Done:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/fwupd-0.7.2-1.fc24%20libappstream-glib-0.5.16-1.fc24
You need to install it, reboot, remove the USB device, replug and then
you should be g
First, apologies if this email is slightly off topic, I figured you
all would be the best people to ask for help.
GNOME Software in F24 allows people to write an end-user review of
specific apps so other users can better choose the correct application
to install. So far we've had loads of great re
On 8 July 2016 at 16:39, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> The idea is adding the stars or replacing written reviews by stars?
We get the star ratings from averaging out all the ratings given as
part of the review process.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chan
On 21 November 2012 11:37, lee wrote:
> It certainly does decrease security getting users used to enter the root
> password everywhere. Polkit should be deprecated.
"man polkit" is your friend.
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription op
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod wrote:
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just too low at the moment and it's wasting
my time.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject
On 23 January 2012 16:10, Freak Trick wrote:
> Is there some way I can get more than one instance of yum running?
I use multiple instances of zif quite a lot, although you still have
to lock the rpmdb if writing and metadata if refreshing, although most
of the stuff I do is operating from a cache
On 27 March 2012 20:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I think uninstalling apper and the yum PK plugin would probably be
> better than ripping out everything PK.
Just remove PackageKit-yum-plugin if you don't want PK to check it's
caches after each command line action. I agree its a nasty bug in
apper th
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 14:24, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> I'm running f33beta, bu I have also seen these, they're owned by the
> packagekit systemd service (confirm by running 'cat /proc/2512/cgroup'
> in your example).
PackageKit doesn't use gpg itself, but it's highly likely libdnf is
doing some
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 05:04, Tim via users
wrote:
> This whole idea of "I can't work on this, let's throw it all out and
> start again" is just incompetence.
I suspect you have no idea how a modern window system works. The
hardware shipping in computers now bears little resemblance to what
X11 w
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:33, Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
> The other message first has a long list of packages, and then ends with "Too
> many packages to process (7664/5200)".
That is indeed a large number of packages; if you file an issue
upstream we can bump the limit an order of magnitude.
https
Hi all,
I've added some initial functionality to gnome-multi-writer yesterday
to detect fake flash drives. If anyone has any USB storage drives that
they know misreport their true capacity, or that they suspect might be
counterfeit, I'd appreciate some testing of a new command line tool.
See http
On 28 January 2015 at 15:40, poma wrote:
> "my repo" is actually what?
Fixed, thanks! It's actually pointing to
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/fedora/21/x86_64/
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fed
On 28 January 2015 at 16:05, poma wrote:
> # gnome-multi-writer-probe --verbose /dev/sde
> Failed to scan device: Failed to open /dev/sde
Hmm, you're root -- do you have any SELinux messages? I'm basically
trying to do "open(block_dev, O_RDWR | O_SYNC)"
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists
On 28 January 2015 at 16:30, poma wrote:
> (gnome-multi-writer-probe:11677): GnomeMultiWriter-DEBUG: Disk reports to be
> 14762MB in size
> Device is FAKE: Failed to verify data at 1248MB
Do you still get this if you unmount the drive before running the
test? We should probably do that anyway I
On 25 March 2015 at 04:22, Tim wrote:
> Jeez, but that sounds such a crap encumbrance. Even just a log out and
> log back in again is a severe nuisance. It's beginning to sound a lot
> like Windows; built for morons, by morons.
Michael is right. Updating online works 99.8% of the time. The 0.1%
On 25 March 2015 at 13:01, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Even for updates to running
> programs, or the DE itself, rebooting is often not necessary.
If you find a reliable race-free way of working out which packages can
safely be updated at runtime, please let me know. Also, any solution
that reli
On 19 April 2015 at 18:44, jd1008 wrote:
> Are all the developers who must do unit and system
> tests before blessing their production as ready to shiip,
> ignorant of (I mean do not know about) this issue?
I'm pretty sure most of those developers don't hibernate anymore
(myself included). Writin
On 28 June 2014 23:14, jeandet alexis wrote:
> Thanks for the documentation, I've added the .appdata.xml file. I'm
> still not able to see my app in gnome-software
GNOME software in 3.10 and 3.12 uses the AppStream metadata that is
generated from the fedora repos. You need to get your application
On 29 June 2014 14:04, jeandet alexis wrote:
> I've looked more in detail about appstream stuff, I've found your tools
> appstream-glib and builder. It seems easy to use if I use my own repo
> but do you have any idea how to trigger it on copr(Any hack?)?
No hack, but I suggest writing an email t
On 22 July 2014 20:33, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> The log is attached. What follows may be relevant. It seems to me that
> the profile is correctly applied. I do not see anything removing it.
> However, I discovered that without the nvidia proprietary driver,
> there is no issue...
Make sure there's
On 9 Aug 2014 14:25, "Ed Greshko" wrote:
> I see. You may still get more help by asking rhughes directly
Nope!
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduc
On 1 September 2014 15:57, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> How do I resolve these package upgrade conflicts?
Build in progress:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/build/30422/
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
On 9 September 2014 08:55, Balint Szigeti wrote:
> Maybe I have watched too many films...
Yes, you have. If you don't like the direction systemd is taking then
please install one of the BSD's and stop the discussion on this user
list. Thanks.
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
On 9 September 2014 12:34, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> contrary to the whole spirit of Linux.
http://islinuxaboutchoice.com/
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code
On 7 October 2011 14:56, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I am facing this kind of error for quite a while:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609081
> So far, no fix in sight.
There's a workaround. Use:
gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power use-time-for-policy false
But yes,
On 13 October 2011 12:51, Ardhan Madras wrote:
> How to disable PackageKit's yum update that sometime
> run in background?, I have very sloow and limited CDMA
> internet connection.
PackageKit shouldn't be doing background operations when on mobile
broadband, are you using NetworkM
On 15 October 2011 17:51, Ardhan Madras wrote:
> Sorry, It's actually the router that has CDMA connection.
> My FC15 box connected and using it as gateway. The router
> connection got slw when PackageKit was running in the FC15.
Right, so PackageKit thinks you've got a high speed LAN connecti
On 17 October 2011 11:22, Dave Cross wrote:
> Under GNOME 3 this notification is rather more persistent. GNOME
> insists on repeating the pop-up every twenty minutes or so. This isn't
> realyl very helpful.
Run palimpset, click the disk, click "SMART data", then tick "Don't
warn me if the disk is
On 14 December 2011 15:32, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> -Asks for reboot or logout
> -The reboot/logout window is not clickable.
> -The gpk-update-viewer process is using 100% CPU time.
I think I've found this bug a few hours ago. Could someone try
building PK with the upstream commit
f8ba469a9d9
On 19 December 2011 00:46, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Actually, I've seen a desperation move work: Put the drive
> in the freezer for a few hours - it just might work long
> enough while at low temperature to get some critical files
> off it (this has really worked at least once or twice
> that I know o
On 11 June 2012 12:15, Joachim Backes wrote:
> try "sudo yum erase PackageKit-command-not-found"
PK-c-n-f doesn't handle the /usr/bin/yum auto-completion at all.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 21 June 2012 13:16, Javier Perez wrote:
> For example, this update while rebooting thing. It is a good thing.
> Therefore I do not understand why make it work only through
> gnome-packagekit. It should work at a more fundamental level, at the Yum
> level.
It's the wrong layer. I covered this (
On 4 July 2012 04:28, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEzMjM
Protip: Don't use phoronix as a reliable news source.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject
On 11 September 2012 09:12, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> 16.7 W 0.0 pkts/sDevice nic:virbr0
16 Watts seems like an order of magnitude too much, at least.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https:/
On 2 March 2013 14:30, Reindl Harald wrote:
> which indicates that the majority of all users avoid the
> grapical stuff and use always yum for good reasons
Emails like this remind me why I should unsubscribe from users@fp.o
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On 18 May 2013 06:12, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> KDE's apper supports AppStream already, so KDE will have similar
> functionality once the extra metadata is available in Fedora.
IF. I gave up trying to get the Fedora infrastructure to provide
AppStream metadata a couple of years ago.
Richard.
-
On 18 May 2013 18:27, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Any GNOME application is pretty much the same as any GTK application
Agreed. gnome-software just requires gtk3-devel at the moment so it'll
work fine in LXDE/XFCE and will work fine in KDE if looking a little
foreign.
Richard
--
users mailing list
u
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15:18, Neal Becker wrote:
> But is there maybe someway to revert the firmware updates? Or any other
> ideas?
"fwupdmgr get-history" would be helpful in knowing what you updated,
and hopefully the older update is also there -- so "fwupdmgr
downgrade" would restore the old
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> fwupdmgr is not well documented. The man pages suck
Remember to be awesome. This is an open source project and the number
of people writing documentation is less than one.
Richard
___
users mailing
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 19:26, Michael D. Setzer II via users
wrote:
> Got a reply that that is currently the case, and only option
> would be to install windows on machine, or remove drive
> and put in windows machine to upgrade??
If the firmware isn't on the LVFS[1] then you might be able to dep
Can you file it here please https://github.com/fwupd/firmware-lenovo/issues
-- and then I'll tag the right people. Thanks R
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, 12:12 Neal Becker, wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:25 PM Richard Hughes
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15
On 28 May 2017 at 00:21, Tom Horsley wrote:
> What is doing this crap?! I have all the automatic
> update junk turned off, who has re-activated it
> and how do I make it stop?
This crap is gnome-software. I don't think there is a gsetting to turn
off just the distro upgrade functionality, but if
On 9 August 2017 at 16:52, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> 8) Are you on drugs? ... Please consider carefully the possibility that you
> are going in the
> wrong direction!
I suggest you go back to where you purchased the software and ask for
a full refund. Seriously, file a decent bug report and we can
On 16 August 2017 at 05:48, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> lid being closed. When I run gnome-tweak-tool and indicates the system
> should suspend on lid closed. I have attached the png image of the
> gnome-tweak-tool screen.
GNOME tweak tool isn't designed for MATE.
> Issue 2: Back in the F24 days a
On 7 September 2017 at 14:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I've never run into a situation where a corruption occurred causing a
> permanent
> damage to my system.
Ohh, it must never happen then. From the person who used to triage the
bugs from when it did, please trust me that offline updates has
reduce
On 12 September 2017 at 19:02, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> This wasn't necessary in earlier times.
Two things:
* It was, but people mostly pretended that Linux was better than
Windows because the latter enforced it and the former didn't...
* When it wasn't, it was because everything was less complicat
On 31 October 2017 at 18:17, Jeandet Alexis
wrote:
> Today I got for the first time a dell Precision 5520 and I saw the
> firmware(EFI) update from gnome softwares, this is AWESOME!
> I hope more vendors will push their fw in the near future :).
Always great to see a happy customer :) If you want
Not DONTCARE, more "really busy with other stuff". If somebody else figures
out a good way to invalidate the cache (probably done in libdnf), I'm happy
to review patches and build packages. It can't *all* be on my shoulders,
right? Richard
On 2 Dec 2017 19:00, "Joe Zeff" wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 1
On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 15:02, John Mellor wrote:
> I've complained about this issue before. Its a defective design
> decision made by the Gnome people, some of whom I suspect to be
> ex-Windows people trying to sabotage the desktop;^0
This is unacceptable.
> but I have yet to either hear of
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
