> So, I think there is an error in the startup of the gnome desktop you are
> using.
Yes, I did run `journalctl -r' and there was many errors related to
"gnome-shell" also in the graphical environment I did run gnome-abrt ("Problem
reporting" applicatin) and there was the same crash report, so
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 15:29:18 -
"Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote:
> Instead of upgrade, I did install LightDM, then stop-disable
> gdm.service and enable lightdm.service, then I did boot Fedora without
> "nomodeset" kernel parameter and the result was LightDM ran on the
> Could you try doing a dnf distro-sync as root from runlevel 3, just
> to be sure no cruft was left around from the upgrade to F27.
Yes I could, but there was 900-1000 MB data for full upgrade! I did
remove some packages which I don't use them like "libreoffice**",
"qt**", 'cheese', gnome-boxes,
> Could you try doing a dnf distro-sync as root from runlevel 3, just
> to be sure no cruft was left around from the upgrade to F27.
Yes I could, but there was 900-1000 MB data for full upgrade! I did
remove some packages which I don't use them like "libreoffice**",
"qt**", 'cheese', gnome-boxes,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:07:52 +0330
Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > What does lsmod show for the module the kernel is using?
>
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/h7C~gfz~QdvZ~nueqbbXBQ
>
The radeon driver is not being loaded by the kernel. It has support
for
> Is there no video? Is the video at the wrong resolution? Does X (or
> wayland) fail to start?
I have video output, but when `nomodeset' parameter is used, xorg and
wayland use VESA resolutions, there is no full and complete resolutions
and also hardware acceleration, this is the problem. Both
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:58:36 -
"Farhad Mohammadi Majd" <farhadbenya...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello, I have an old PC from 2008 which has integrated graphics
> processors (IGP), I did install Fedora 26 few months ago and it had
> mentioned problem, I used "nomode
Hello, I have an old PC from 2008 which has integrated graphics processors
(IGP), I did install Fedora 26 few months ago and it had mentioned problem, I
used "nomodeset" kernel parameter for boot during installation and local boot,
but I didn't report the problem.
Today I did install
Il giorno sab, 18/11/2017 alle 10.47 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
>
>
> $ sudo dnf downgrade dnf -y
Today
Another upgrade from f26 to f27 failed after reboot
Another dnf downgrade done
Another successful update using old dnf version.
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 27
Hi all,
thankyou for this help.
I solved changing the options in the sddm.conf
Bye
Ambrogio
Il giorno mer, 15/11/2017 alle 15.08 +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer ha
scritto:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:52:23 -0600
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> > > ogio spam
Il giorno gio, 16/11/2017 alle 18.09 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> I have update my notebook since Fedora 18 to Fedora 26 always without
> problem.
>
> Today I have try to update Fedora 26 to 27, but after download
> packages
> and run "dnf system-upgrade reboot&qu
Gordon Messmer writes:
On 11/16/2017 03:34 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
This explains why someone else managed to upgrade a wireless laptop without
networking. Something is going horribly sideways here. 'system-upgrade
reboot' is whining only about my local repo:
Does your repository
On 11/16/2017 03:34 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
This explains why someone else managed to upgrade a wireless laptop
without networking. Something is going horribly sideways here.
'system-upgrade reboot' is whining only about my local repo:
Does your repository configuration specify a very
On 11/16/2017 02:47 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513111
The bug appears to be that dnf processes the last metadata update time
while in the offline system-upgrade mode. I was able to work around the
problem by re-running "dnf system-upgrade
John Pilkington writes:
On 16/11/17 22:33, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno gio, 16/11/2017 alle 13.39 -0500, Sam Varshavchik ha scritto:
Looks like this is going to be a common, very, very popular bug.
Pretty sure
this is bug 1513111.
"system-upgrade reboot" apparently now requires a fully
On 16/11/17 22:33, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno gio, 16/11/2017 alle 13.39 -0500, Sam Varshavchik ha scritto:
Looks like this is going to be a common, very, very popular bug.
Pretty sure
this is bug 1513111.
"system-upgrade reboot" apparently now requires a fully working
network stack,
se it tries to resynchronize with all the repos,
> despite that this is supposed to be done, and it was done, by
> "system-upgrade download".
>
> I think this is a bug, and it needs to be fixed.
Thanks Sam, what Bug you talking about?, can you please post me the
link?
Thanks
On 16.11.2017 19:39, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> "system-upgrade reboot" apparently now requires a fully working network
> stack, because it tries to resynchronize with all the repos, despite
> that this is supposed to be done, and it was done, by "system-upgrade
> download".
i doubt that is a
It worked for me on wireless last night. I saw no errors, not sure if
the wireless was started at that stage of the upgrade.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> So wireless won't cut it eh?
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Sam Varshavchik
So wireless won't cut it eh?
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> Dario Lesca writes:
>
>
> ott 2017 06:39:15 CEST.
>> 2017-11-16T15:39:31Z DEBUG Impossibile scaricare '
>> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-rele
>>
Dario Lesca writes:
ott 2017 06:39:15 CEST.
2017-11-16T15:39:31Z DEBUG Impossibile scaricare '
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-
f27=x86_64': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (6):
Couldn't resolve host name for
I have update my notebook since Fedora 18 to Fedora 26 always without
problem.
Today I have try to update Fedora 26 to 27, but after download packages
and run "dnf system-upgrade reboot", when the system restart the update
fail after a while after this boot message:
Start
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:52:23 -0600
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > ogio spam wrote:
> >
> >> [ ]
> >> I attached the photos.
> >>
> >> Before update
> >> https://imagebin.ca/v/3hI3FMuKOvmx
> >>
> >> After update
> >> https://imagebin.ca/v/3hI32ZFW0rMs
Rex Dieter wrote:
> ogio spam wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 22.49 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>>
>>> I have fully updated F26 systems and the login displays have not
>>> changed for me. So,
>>> I can't think of what may have happened for you.
>>>
>>> I am not
ogio spam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 22.49 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>
>> I have fully updated F26 systems and the login displays have not
>> changed for me. So,
>> I can't think of what may have happened for you.
>>
>> I am not entirely clear on what you display
On 11/14/2017 10:08 AM, ogio spam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 22.49 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>
>> I have fully updated F26 systems and the login displays have not
>> changed for me. So,
>> I can't think of what may have happened for you.
>>
>> I am not entirely
Hi all,
Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 22.49 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> I have fully updated F26 systems and the login displays have not
> changed for me. So,
> I can't think of what may have happened for you.
>
> I am not entirely clear on what you display looks like now. Possible
> to
On 11/13/2017 06:56 AM, ogio spam wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> I can't remember... can photos be attached to a messages or there is a
> simply way to upload images?
Take a screen snapshot or photo, upload it to something like pastebin
and include a link to the pastebin upload in your message. Do NOT
attach
Hi Ed,
I can't remember... can photos be attached to a messages or there is a
simply way to upload images?
Tnx
Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 22.49 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> On 11/13/17 22:09, ogio spam wrote:
> > Hi Ed,
> >
> > Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 19.48 +0800, Ed Greshko ha
On 11/13/17 22:09, ogio spam wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 19.48 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>
> Actually the display manager is sddm:
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36 6 lug 00.04
> /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service ->
> /usr/lib/systemd/system/sddm.service
>
> The
Hi Ed,
Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 19.48 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> On 11/13/17 18:03, ogio spam wrote:
> > I don't know what I'm using.
> > The question is that it changed after dnf update.
> > How can I check what i'm using?
>
>
> The output of
>
> ll
On 11/13/17 18:03, ogio spam wrote:
> I don't know what I'm using.
> The question is that it changed after dnf update.
> How can I check what i'm using?
The output of
ll /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service
Will point to the display manager you're using
--
Fedora Users List - The
t depends on what do you use and
> how do you set up the theme.
>
> Regards,
> Silvia
>
>
>
>
> On 13 November 2017 at 10:13, ogio spam <ogio.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > before the last updates, after power on, my fedora 26 showed a list
What is your login screen? GDM? SDDM? Other?
It never showed a list to me, but it depends on what do you use and how do
you set up the theme.
Regards,
Silvia
On 13 November 2017 at 10:13, ogio spam <ogio.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> before the last updates, after power on,
Hi all,
before the last updates, after power on, my fedora 26 showed a list of
users and asked for password.
I use KDE.
After last upgrade (I can't remember what changed, but some related to
KDE and X11) the login requires user and password, and it no more lists
users and pictures.
Can someone
able to use it wirelessly, and been able to use the mouse wired
when I don't want the power saving built into the mouse.
Under Fedora 26 I cannot get bluetoothctl to see the mouse.
Bluetooth is enabled and bluetoothctl can see my dongle and can see
localhost.localdomain and my TV (even
op from Fedora 25 to 26. The upgrade
> process just announced it will downgrade Scala from 2.12 to
> 2.10. Why Fedora 26 comes with a very old Scala version, when
> the latest is Scala 2.12.4 and it is available as RPM
> <http://www.scala-lang.org/down
On 10/31/2017 11:12 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Samuel Sieb > wrote:
I assume you installed that 2.12 version of Scala yourself, it's not
from Fedora.
Yes, it is not from Fedora. So, why Fedora doesn't
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote:
> On 10/31/2017 09:01 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>
>>I'm just upgrading a laptop from Fedora 25 to 26. The upgrade process
>> just announced it will downgrade Scala from 2.12 to 2.10. Why Fedora
On 10/31/2017 09:01 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
I'm just upgrading a laptop from Fedora 25 to 26. The upgrade process
just announced it will downgrade Scala from 2.12 to 2.10. Why Fedora 26
comes with a very old Scala version, when the latest is Scala 2.12.4 and
it is available as RPM
Hello,
I'm just upgrading a laptop from Fedora 25 to 26. The upgrade process
just announced it will downgrade Scala from 2.12 to 2.10. Why Fedora 26
comes with a very old Scala version, when the latest is Scala 2.12.4 and it
is available as RPM <http://www.scala-lang.org/downl
inux/fedora-secondary/releases/26/Everything/i386/os/Packages/f/fedora-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
> > ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/local/fedora/26/i386/os/Packages/bellet-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
> > ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/remi/fedora/26/remi/i386/remi-release-26-2.fc26.remi.noarch.rpm
> >
/fedora/26/i386/os/Packages/bellet-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/remi/fedora/26/remi/i386/remi-release-26-2.fc26.remi.noarch.rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/rpmfusion/free/fedora/releases/26/Everything/i386/os/Packages/r/rpmfusion-free-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 17:47:44 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> wrote:
> On 10/14/2017 11:24 AM, Franta Hanzlík wrote:
> > I want to try Fedora 26 i386 (with my preferred Mate desktop).
> > I prefer network installation with custom kickstart config.
> > I f
On 10/14/2017 11:24 AM, Franta Hanzlík wrote:
I want to try Fedora 26 i386 (with my preferred Mate desktop).
I prefer network installation with custom kickstart config.
I found that install image can be downloaded on:
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/26
Hi Franta,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Franta Hanzlík <fra...@hanzlici.cz> wrote:
> I want to try Fedora 26 i386 (with my preferred Mate desktop).
> I prefer network installation with custom kickstart config.
> I found that install image can be downloade
I want to try Fedora 26 i386 (with my preferred Mate desktop).
I prefer network installation with custom kickstart config.
I found that install image can be downloaded on:
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/26/Workstation/i386/iso/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-26
; I did install diffusion free and difussion not free .
That and the -devel for it are the two packages still provided by the
"livna" repo.
They are listed as fc24 but this is what you get for fedora 26.
http://rpm.livna.org/
>sudo dnf repository-packages livna info
Last metadata
Hi Fedora lovers ,
Is there a way to install (yum or dnf) the dvd suppicture decoder ?
I am not able to manage.
Be so kind to help me resolve this , in mine opinion , simple problem :
I did install diffusion free and difussion not free .
Regards,
Ger van Dijck.
--
Using Opera's
Hi all,
Question : I have a Topfield 5000 PVR Satallite Reciever equiped with a
160 mB hard disk.
Is there a posibillity to communicate between the contains of
the HD (movies etc.) and Fedora 26 ?
Kind Regards,
Ger van Dijck
>
> FWIW, if you hover on the screenshot it is from version 2.4.
>
> If you download the source code for calligra and go into the "flow"
> directory they
> talk about "Kivio" and not calligra-flow. So, is it possible that
> "flow" has been
> superseded by
>
>
On 10/11/17 18:58, Earl Ramirez wrote:
>> It seems there is no longer a calligra-flow package available. I'm
>> not
>> familiar with calligra, but is it possible that the functionality was
>> moved into the core package if the subpackage was empty? The
>> documentation should tell you that.
>>
> It seems there is no longer a calligra-flow package available. I'm
> not
> familiar with calligra, but is it possible that the functionality was
> moved into the core package if the subpackage was empty? The
> documentation should tell you that.
>
> * Wed Jul 12 2017 Rex Dieter
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:29:51 -0400
Earl Ramirez wrote:
> Good Day Fedora Community,
>
> After I have upgraded Fedora from F25 to F26, I noticed that calligra-
> sheets and calligra-words was installed; however, calligra-flow, the
> only product from the calligra suite
Good Day Fedora Community,
After I have upgraded Fedora from F25 to F26, I noticed that calligra-
sheets and calligra-words was installed; however, calligra-flow, the
only product from the calligra suite that I use was no longer
installed.
I tried to install it, dnf simply ignores it and tries
Hello,
I've been trying to install `pandoc-crossref` on my Fedora 26 system
using Cabal, but can't seem to do so. I've tried three different
machines and get the same error on all. Would someone with some Haskell
experience be able to help please?
Here's the error. I've also filed the upstream
On 09/02/2017 09:58 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote:
> Hi everyone, anyone found workaround on getting VMware player loaded
> without problem ? I saw people posted on VMware community board and
> the respond are less, so I try my luck posting here.
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux fedora26 4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 #1
Hi everyone, anyone found workaround on getting VMware player loaded
without problem ? I saw people posted on VMware community board and the
respond are less, so I try my luck posting here.
$ uname -a
Linux fedora26 4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 17 15:30:20 UTC 2017
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
>
>> Looks like my installation is also broken, not only the dvd writer part,
>> something really messed up by dnf. But... No clue why
Allegedly, on or about 23 August 2017, Zoltan Hoppar sent:
> Looks like my installation is also broken, not only the dvd writer
> part, something really messed up by dnf. But... No clue why
> burning *any* media is impossible, because when the process is
> started looks everything nice - it's
On 08/23/2017 02:51 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Zoltan Hoppar > wrote:
Looks like my installation is also broken, not only the dvd writer
part, something really messed up by dnf. But... No clue why
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
> Looks like my installation is also broken, not only the dvd writer part,
> something really messed up by dnf. But... No clue why burning *any*
> media is impossible, because when the process is started looks
Looks like my installation is also broken, not only the dvd writer part,
something really messed up by dnf. But... No clue why burning *any*
media is impossible, because when the process is started looks everything
nice - it's just torns the drive when needs to be finalised. Worse thing is
On 08/23/2017 10:54 AM, Terry Polzin wrote:
> Has anyone had difficulties burning files to DVD?
>
> I am trying to burn pictures I imported from my phone with XFBURN and
> after what appears to be a successful burn, the DVD does not show
> anything on it.
The last time I saw that, it was because
Has anyone had difficulties burning files to DVD?
I am trying to burn pictures I imported from my phone with XFBURN and after
what appears to be a successful burn, the DVD does not show anything on it.
Thanks,
Terry
___
users mailing list --
isdtor writes:
> I'm trying to kickstart a Fedora 26 server from a local repo. What is the
> magic sauce to force installation from local repo only?
>
> The PXE file points inst.stage2 to the local repo and sets inst.geoloc=0, yet
> after "Starting automated install&qu
I'm trying to kickstart a Fedora 26 server from a local repo. What is the magic
sauce to force installation from local repo only?
The PXE file points inst.stage2 to the local repo and sets inst.geoloc=0, yet
after "Starting automated install", download of repodata/* files, there i
Tim:
>>> Have we got to the stage where the default install options for
>>> Fedora work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
Rick Stevens:
> For many users, LVM is somewhat irrelevant. I use LVM because I often
> end up expanding filesystems by adding PVs to the VGs the LVs are
>
On 7/31/17 6:16 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Just upgraded from f25 to f26. Most programs run better, but
scrollbars no longer have arrows at their upper and lower ends. System
Settings used to have a function to control this, but it seems to be
gone, both in native KDE and Gnome applications.
On 08/09/2017 01:48 PM, Craig Lanning wrote:
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:52 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
Gentle People:
I hate to interrupt your Fedora 26 party, but well here goes a
dose of reality from the
USER's PROSPECTIVE!
Yours is not *the* user's perspective. Yours is *a* user's
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:52:59 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
^^
That doesn't match the tone you've used in some of your rants.
> I want Text Editors, shell Windows, gcc, gdb , and ddd.
> 6) Yum and rpm: Please print to the screen the directories where S/W is
> installed. So
On 9 August 2017 at 16:52, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> 8) Are you on drugs? ... Please consider carefully the possibility that you
> are going in the
> wrong direction!
I suggest you go back to where you purchased the software and ask for
a full refund. Seriously, file a
On 08/09/2017 09:41 AM, ergodic wrote:
> Amen!
> Let me further add that neither Fedora 26 Live or Fedora 26 XFCE work.
> I had to install Fedora 25 and then upgrade with dnf to Fedora 26.
> Nautilus has become so limited that I switched to nemo.
Then you didn't do it correctly. F26
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:52 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
>
>I hate to interrupt your Fedora 26 party, but well here goes a
> dose of reality from the
> USER's PROSPECTIVE!
Yours is not *the* user's perspective. Yours is *a* user's perspective.
Here is *my* use
at login, Once selected, I was on Xfce all the time. I filed a
bug report on this, but I never tested F25 to see if they fixed the Xfce
install...
On 08/09/2017 12:41 PM, ergodic wrote:
Amen!
Let me further add that neither Fedora 26 Live or Fedora 26 XFCE work.
I had to install Fedora 25
On 08/09/2017 07:59 AM, mitchell@member.fsf.org wrote:
> Rick Stevens writes:
>
>>
>>
>> root@prophead ~]# strings /usr/sbin/grubby | grep "^/" | uniq
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>> /boof
>> /dev
>> /boot/grub/menu.lst
>> /etc/grub2-efi.cfg
>> /boot/grub/grub.cfg
>>
Amen!
Let me further add that neither Fedora 26 Live or Fedora 26 XFCE work.
I had to install Fedora 25 and then upgrade with dnf to Fedora 26.
Nautilus has become so limited that I switched to nemo.
It is a shame!
- Original Message -
> Gentle People:
> I hate to interrup
Gentle People:
I hate to interrupt your Fedora 26 party, but well here goes a dose
of reality from the
USER's PROSPECTIVE!
1) First of all F26's performance is very poor. its a CPU hog and DRAM !
I installed F26 in a Virtual Box (VBox)
on a two processor machine and it is so slow
grub.conf
> /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf
> /etc/zipl.conf
> /etc/silo.conf
> /etc/lilo.conf
> /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/elilo.conf
> /etc/grub.conf
> /boot/grub/device.map
> /etc/SuSE-release
> /var/log/grubby
>
> So based on that, no it doesn't look at /etc/default/grub.
On 8 August 2017 at 20:59, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:50:54 -0700
> Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> Note that on your next kernel upgrade, however, the "rhgb quiet" will
>> reappear unless you edit the /etc/default/grub file and those bits from
>> the
On 08/08/2017 12:26 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/08/17 14:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> So, yes, you're using UEFI to boot. All you need to do is edit the
>> /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg file and remove the "rhgb quiet" bit and
>> reboot. You should be fine.
>>
>> Note that on your next kernel
way I rebooted and it worked as expected, the boot data shows instead of the egg and
"f".
Thanks for the help.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 FEDORA-26/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users maili
On 08/08/2017 11:59 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:50:54 -0700
> Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> Note that on your next kernel upgrade, however, the "rhgb quiet" will
>> reappear unless you edit the /etc/default/grub file and those bits from
>> the "GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX" variable in there
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:50:54 -0700
Rick Stevens wrote:
> Note that on your next kernel upgrade, however, the "rhgb quiet" will
> reappear unless you edit the /etc/default/grub file and those bits from
> the "GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX" variable in there as well.
That hasn't been my experience. The
On 08/08/2017 11:24 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/08/17 14:02, Rick Stevens wrote:
>>> I see two boot partitions:
>>>
>>> /dev/sda2 976M 167M 742M 19% /boot
>>> /dev/sda1 200M 9.5M 191M 5% /boot/efi
>>>
>>> But it says "efi" not "uefi" and I dunno what the difference is.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 FEDORA-26/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/08/2017 10:24 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/08/17 13:10, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> (The main problem being finding
>> the grub.cfg file if you have a uefi system - it is hidden
>> pretty well :-).
>
> +
>
> Then that must be my problem?
>
> I see two boot partitions:
>
> dev/sda2
5% /boot/efi
But it says "efi" not "uefi" and I dunno what the difference is. It's a
Fedora 26 install on hard drive /dev/sda and that drive I select from
the boot menu. I don't think /dev/sdb/ is even mounted, was surprised to
see it working on that.
Confused ...
-
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:03:46 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Obviously this is wrong? Whay should I be doing or is this something I
> can no longer change?
Nothing ever looks at /etc/default/grub or runs grub2-mkconfig unless
you manually run it.
I just edit the grub.cfg file itself. It works
I prefer not watching the blank screen with the egg turning into an F
and normally remove rhgb from /etc/default/grub.
That is not having the desired effect on this Fedora-26 system.
[root@Box10 bobg]# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Generating grub configuration file ...
Found linux
On 08/07/2017 02:30 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 8/5/17 5:36 PM, Tim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have we got to the stage where the default install options for Fedora
>> 26 work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
>>
>> At the moment I've let it i
On 8/5/17 5:36 PM, Tim wrote:
Hi,
Have we got to the stage where the default install options for Fedora
26 work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
At the moment I've let it install with whatever parameters it does by
itself. All I did was change from using LVM to EXT4 (I
On 08/05/2017 06:12 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> If this is true then good Milan Broz is working for Redhat ... :)
>
> Anyways: I'd recommend to be careful with trim on encrypted SSD's
He is also the main contact for the dm-crypt Fedora package.
; TRIM done periodically.
> >
>
> Careful when using encrypted SSD's - looks like this written by one of
> the authors of the cryptsetup man page:
>
> http://asalor.blogspot.de/2011/08/trim-dm-crypt-problems.html
Addendum: it *looks like* the Fedora 26 trim doesn't touch e
On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 15:47 +0200, José María Terry Jiménez wrote:
> El 5/8/17 a las 9:36, Tim escribió:
>
> Enable the fstrim timer: "sudo systemctl enable fstrim.timer" to get
> TRIM done periodically.
>
Careful when using encrypted SSD's - looks like this written by one of
the authors of
On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 17:06 +0930, Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have we got to the stage where the default install options for Fedora
> 26
> work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
Not that I knew about problems regarding such an install. I had my first
instal
El 5/8/17 a las 9:36, Tim escribió:
Hi,
Have we got to the stage where the default install options for Fedora
26 work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
At the moment I've let it install with whatever parameters it does by
itself. All I did was change from using LVM
Hi,
Have we got to the stage where the default install options for Fedora 26
work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
At the moment I've let it install with whatever parameters it does by
itself. All I did was change from using LVM to EXT4 (I see absolutely
no advantage
Allegedly, on or about 30 July 2017, Samuel Sieb sent:
> Why would you ever use the arrows? And why would you use the thumb
> for anything other than general location in a large file? Do you have
> a mouse without a wheel or a touchpad that doesn't do scrolling?
Not on KDE, but when window
On 07/30/2017 06:27 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 14:06 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/30/2017 01:41 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I really wonder why they don't just get rid of the scrollbar
completely. If you are looking at a big file and you so much
as touch the scrollbar
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo