Thanks for your answers I'll use normal C-style MPI so. I checked
boost, but it seems it only supplies me with a shared communication
interface among the nodes, turning a little difficult to parallelize
the processes itself, also boost obligate me to have an MPI
installation too. Boost is
Open MPI does not currently support NAT; sorry. :-(
On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Ronis wrote:
(This may be a duplicate. An earlier post seems to have been lost).
I'm using openmpi (1.3.2) to run on 3 dual processor machines (running
linux, slackware-12.1, gcc-4.4.0). Two are directly
On Jul 4, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jul 3, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Dorian Krause wrote:
I would discourage you to use the C++ bindings, since (to my
knowledge)
they might be removed from MPI 3.0 (there is such a proposal).
There is a proposal that has passed one vote so far to
Thanks Jeff.
Le 09-07-04 à 08:24, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
There is a proposal that has passed one vote so far to deprecate the
C++ bindings in MPI-2.2 (meaning: still have them, but advise
against using them). This opens the door for potentially removing
the C++ bindings in MPI-3.0.
As
hi every one
I built and rpm file for openmpi-1.3.2 with openmpi.spec and buildrpm.sh on the
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.3/srpm.php
I change buildrpm.sh as fllowing:
prefix="/usr/local/openmpi/intel/1.3.2"
specfile="openmpi.spec"
#rpmbuild_options=${rpmbuild_options:-"--define
