I only have one source for that. The TCP Cloud guys claim the NIC drivers arent
efficient, and a ten gig link will top out around 4.9Gb, whereas native
contrail encapsulation will reach 9.6 or so.
They seemed experienced and convinced enough that it was worth listening to,
all other things
>The documentation seems to suggest that the TOR Services Node requires VXLAN
>encapsulation in order
> to support baremetal hosts. Am I reading that right? We’re looking at
> contrail now, and the best information seems
> to suggest that VXLAN encapsulation halves the effective line rate of
