using the dns server it
installed, and hence internal DNS doesn't resolve.
Is there a way to get the openstack-ansible playbooks to use the internal
dns (which was created by “ansible-playbook
openshift-ansible-contrib/playbooks/provisioning/openstack/provision.yaml”),
which in my case is “10.2.100.5”?
sType in the storage class but it hasn't helped.
My /etc/origin/cloudprovider/openstack.conf looks correct, but I cannot
figure out what is going on.
There is nothing useful in journalctl -xe on the master
How else can I diagnose?
Thanks,
Joel
--
Kind Regards,
Joel Pearson
Agile Digital | Senior
nshift 3.6 on
OpenStack without that setting.
Thanks,
Joel
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 1:49 PM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having no luck getting dynamic provisioning of cinder volumes working.
>
> I followed
> https://docs.o
;
> Good luck ☺
>
>
>
> *De : *<users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com> au nom de Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
> *Date : *lundi 9 octobre 2017 à 14:54
> *À : *"users@lists.openshift.redhat.com" <users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> >
> *O
Ok, my bad it looks like the
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible-contrib/blob/master/playbooks/provisioning/openstack/post-provision-openstack.yml
playbook does what I’m after. I’ll run that and see what happens
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 at 6:58 am, Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com
Looks like the post-provision-openstack.yml did run by itself, but I needed
to restart all the nodes to pick up the new DNS entries via DHCP. Maybe I
should submit a PR to include that tip, unless of course, a restart wasn't
supposed to be necessary.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:15 AM Joel Pearson
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Kind Regards,
Joel Pearson
Agile Digital | Senior Software Consultant
Love Your Software™ | ABN 98 106 361 273
p: 1300 858 277 | m: 0405 417 843 <0405417843> | w: agiledigital.com.au
___
Sorry I meant it say, it *cannot modify the http request in any way.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 12:51 am, Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> If you use Passthrough termination then that means that OpenShift cannot
> add the X-Forwarded-F
; Jared, (韦煜)
> Software developer
> Interested in open source software, big data, Linux
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Kind Regards,
Joel Pea
> openshift_master_identity_providers=[{'name': 'my_ldap_provider', ...,
>>> 'kind': 'LDAPPasswordIdentityProvider', ..., *'bindPassword': { 'file':
>>> 'bindPassword.encrypted'*
>>> *'keyFile': 'bindPassword.key'}*, ...}]
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>
ct.
>
> The value of password is the API password and works with the python
> openstack client.
>
> Can anyone spot what is wrong?
> What is Openshift tying to do when it tries to init the cloud provider and
> fails?
>
>
>
>
> On 04/11/2017 11:51, Joel Pearson
Oh, I didn't realise configmaps got updated without a Pod restart. How
long does it take to update? I see in (
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-pod-configmap/#mounted-configmaps-are-updated-automatically)
it says the kubelet sync period + ttl. What are the
Hi,
I’m trying to get an existing docker container that has Oracle Java 7 and
JBoss AS 7.1.1 running in OpenShift 3.6.
However when JBoss tries to start the jvm it hangs with no output, in a
terminal we’ve tried running the same Java command that standalone.sh runs
and it hangs the same way.
d by the istag import
> policy:
>
> importPolicy: insecure: true
>
> I have not been able to get it to work with insecure: false. I can't find
> the right place to put the remote's ca for the registry to use it. But it
> all works well when insecure is true.
>
>
> C
, but the pull should
> be faster once the blobs have been cached in the local registry. (assuming
> mirroring pullthrough is turned on, which by default i believe it is).
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On 18 November 2017 at 16:53, Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.co
Ahh ok. Is there some way to abuse build config‘s to push existing images
to remote OpenShift registries?
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 at 6:15 pm, Ben Parees <bpar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au> wrote:
>
I’ve had this problem too. You need to use the original route name (you can
change the host name) as the Jenkins service account refers to the route
name for oauth purposes.
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 at 4:13 pm, Marc Boorshtein
wrote:
> I have a fresh install of Origin 3.6.1 on
oud.kubernetes.secrets.paths=/tmp/applicationproperties'
> -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
> -Dfabric8.mode=openshift -Dfabric8.skipResourceValidation=true
> -Dopenshiftnamespace=${destNamespace} -Dreplicas=${replicaCount} clean
> fabric8:resource-apply -s devops/maven/
Hi,
I spend most of the day debugging why my OpenShift registry wasn’t working
because the cluster lives behind a http proxy. I can see OpenShift ansible
configured the registry with proxy settings including no_proxy, but in the
error logs I could see during authentication it was trying to talk
It would introduce a new final layer right? Because after every build,
OpenShift automatically adds a bunch of labels?
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 at 7:13 am, Ben Parees <bpar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
For reference what you're after is:
openshift_disable_check=disk_availability
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:05 AM Scott Dodson wrote:
> It really depends on the configuration changes you want to make whether or
> not you can simply re-run config.yml and get what you're looking
Hi,
I'm using OpenShift 3.6.1 in AWS and I tried using "oc import-image" to
pull an image from one openshift cluster to another. I setup the docker
secrets, and it appeared to be working as there was a bunch of metadata
visible in the image stream.
However, when actually started a pod, it
.
If you have issues with cinder, you might need to try my pull request too.
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/5776
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:21 PM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> Yes mine too, but if you want it to work you need to add it back. I
ger stable. But I want the
containerized version now, so that I can get 3.6.1, as it looks like there
are no rpms for 3.6.1 yet.
Thanks,
-Joel
--
Kind Regards,
Joel Pearson
Agile Digital | Senior Software Consultant
Love Your Software™ | ABN 98 106 361 273
p: 1300 858 277 | m: 0405 417
.centos.x86_64
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:01 AM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install Origin 3.6.1 in AWS, and the containerized version
> isn't working because the redhat registry isn't setup correctly via the
> ansible scripts.
>
>
We're going to work on making
> that the default for origin installs.
>
> Also, the origin 3.6.1 RPMs were tagged into the release repos today so
> those should soon be available if you prefer RPM based installs.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Joel Pearson <
>
th:"/etc/origin/cloudprovider/openstack.conf", Err:0x2}
>
> And indeed the /etc/origin/cloudprovider/ dir is empty.
>
> So am I missing something important here?
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.c
I added this to mine:
openshift_cloudprovider_openstack_tenant_name: "{{
lookup('env','OS_TENANT_NAME') }}"
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:50 PM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> You're missing "(openshift_cloudprov
/openshift-ansible/blob/81cf5123366814d098b7ca169a6e4deb2759507d/roles/openshift_cloud_provider/tasks/openstack.yml#L10
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:41 PM Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/11/2017 22:24, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
> Are you actually filling in those values wi
ems in case set
> unset OS_TENANT_ID
> unset OS_TENANT_NAME
>
> Is openshift expecting an earlier release?
>
> On 04/11/2017 09:51, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
> I added this to mine:
>
> openshift_cloudprovider_openstack_tenant_name: "{{
> lookup('env','OS_TENANT_NAME'
an be caused by not running prune or having an
> automated process that creates lots of an object. Excessive CPU use can be
> caused by an errant client or component stuck in a hot loop repeatedly
> taking the same action.
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2017, at 1:55 AM, Joel Pearson <ja
order to make it work with OpenShift, now?
>
> 2018-05-02 16:34 GMT+02:00 Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>:
>
>> Selectors refer to labels, so it’d be
>> deploymentconfig.metadata.labels.name
>>
>> SSL/TLS means the client has to support it too. So if t
_enable_origin_repo=true
> openshift_repos_enable_testing=true
>
> On 21/05/18 11:32, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
> They’re in the paas repo. You don’t have that repo installed for some
> reason.
>
> Ansible is supposed to lay that down
>
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos
They’re in the paas repo. You don’t have that repo installed for some
reason.
Ansible is supposed to lay that down
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin/
Why don’t you use the system container version instead? Or you prefer rpms?
On Mon, 21 May 2018 at 8:30 pm, Tim
OpenShift already has some support for F5 load balancer’s as a router. So
maybe given the choice between F5 or netscalers, then F5’s might make
sense.
But either will work fine, it’s probably more a question of which device
you have more skills in.
On Wed, 16 May 2018 at 3:17 am, Yu Wei
Tim
>
> [1] https://docs.openshift.org/latest/install_config/install/adv
> anced_install.html#multiple-masters
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
Hi,
I’m wondering what the most reliable method for installing Origin on Centos
7 is?
* RPMs
* Containerized
* System containers
Just recently we discovered that upgrading from 3.6 to 3.7 doesn’t seem to
be tested using the containerized method, as the etcd upgrade fails as it
tries to find
egardless
>
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 2018, at 23:26, Joel Pearson
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’m wondering what the most reliable method for installing Origin on
> Centos 7 is?
> >
> > * RPMs
> > * Containerized
> > * System containers
&
I guess that means your admin user doesn’t have the cluster-admin role
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 4:02 am, Brian Keyes wrote:
> I am attempting to follow these instructions
>
>
> https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.7/day_two_guide/project_level_tasks.html
>
> I want to backup THE sample
What operating system is your local machine? Ok windows I’ve noticed the oc
binary doesn’t doesn’t do terminal emulation properly. So it looks like
it’s hanging but it’s actually working. Try typing “ls” and see if the
command has actually worked, but you’re just not setting the command
prompt.
On
Hi,
I'm running OpenShift 3.9 on AWS with masters in HA mode using Classic
ELB's doing TCP load balancing. If I restart masters, from outside the
cluster the ELB does the right thing and takes a master out of service.
However, if something tries to talk to the kubernetes API inside the
cluster,
If you're using SSL/TLS you could traverse the Router by use Passthrough.
Otherwise, you have to use NodePorts on a Service or something like that.
The Router is generally only really for HTTP, but with passthrough SSL/TLS
just about anything could be running in the pod.
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at
> ports:
> - port: 3036
> nodePort: 30036
> name: http
> selector:
> name: mysql
>
>
>
>
>
> 2018-05-02 15:53 GMT+02:00 Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>:
>
>> If you're using SSL/TLS you could traverse the Ro
Upgrade your cluster to 3.9 just to be safe? You know you want too ... ;)
On Fri, 4 May 2018 at 6:00 am, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> Any Prometheus experts out there that can comment on this?
>
>
> On 30/04/18 15:19, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> > I'm running Prometheus an Origin cluster
If you’re ok with CloudFormation then these ansible scripts can do that
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible-contrib/tree/master/reference-architecture/aws-ansible
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 at 4:46 am, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to provision an
emberOf=cn=staff,ou=groups,dc=company,dc=com,dc=au)
And that worked like a charm. As manually provisioning users sounds like
way too much effort.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:50 AM Jordan Liggitt <jligg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Joel Pearson <
> japear...@a
; So if anyone can shed any light on this then please do so!
>
> Could you explain more about 'an alternative is to create a floating ip
> range that uses private non-routable ip addressees'?
>
>
> On 04/01/18 20:17, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
> I had exactly the same concern and I discovere
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:31 PM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed OpenShift 3.7.0 containerized on OpenStack, and I'm getting
> some issues with the service catalog. It's spewing heaps of errors into
> the journal. Lots of very large e
I had exactly the same concern and I discovered that inside the heat
template there is a bastion mode, which once enabled it doesn’t use
floating ip’s any more.
Have a look at
cs for this a bit baffling. Is there anyone on this list who
> was involved with creating this who can help get this straight?
> On 04/01/18 23:13, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Yes, I only discovered what the basion setting did by looking at the heat
> template, as I
You could use a StatefulSet if you want a consistent hostname, it would
also ensure that there is a always one running.
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 3:49 am, Feld, Michael (IMS)
wrote:
> Does anyone know why a standalone pod (without a replication controller)
> sometimes persists
lated resources to json, strip out ownerReferences,
and create all the resources again.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:30 PM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> Hmm, in my case I don't need to need to restart to cause the problem to
> happen. Is there some way to run nigh
Hi,
Has anyone else noticed that the new OpenShift Origin 3.7 Template Broker
seems super flaky?
For example, if I deploy a Jenkins (Persistent or Ephemeral), and then I
modify the route, by adding an annotation for example:
kubernetes.io/tls-acme: 'true'
I have
ce?
On 8 January 2018 at 15:29, Ben Parees <bpar...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:35 PM, Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Ahh, I looked into all the obje
Hi,
I just wanted to check what the proper way is to limit which users are
allowed to login to OpenShift via an LDAP group.
There doesn't seem to be a way during authentication, but on the
authorisation side of things I found that if I removed
"system:authenticated" from the basic-user cluster
Hi,
I've installed OpenShift 3.7.0 containerized on OpenStack, and I'm getting
some issues with the service catalog. It's spewing heaps of errors into
the journal. Lots of very large errors.
In the end it looks like it isn't deploying properly because it can't find
the tag it is after, as I
What mode are you running the AWS load balancers in? You probably want to
run them as TCP load balancers and not HTTP. That way as you say the SNI
will not get messed with.
On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 at 4:45 am, Marc Boorshtein
wrote:
> So if I bypass the AWS load balancer,
20, 2018 at 8:55 AM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
wrote:
> What mode are you running the AWS load balancers in? You probably want to
> run them as TCP load balancers and not HTTP. That way as you say the SNI
> will not get messed with.
> On Sat, 20 Jan 201
I presume you’re running OpenShift 3.7?
If you’re running the new template broker (openshift-ansible installs it)
it has a nasty bug that does what you describe. But you can work around it
by removing an owner reference see:
The information about where the bug is fixed is:
https://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshift-archives/users/2018-January/msg00042.html
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 at 8:19 pm, Alon Zusman wrote:
> Yes I do. This fix worked for few times but then it started to make the
> router and
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to use the DNS hostname when deploying
OpenShift on AWS using
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible-contrib/tree/master/reference-architecture/aws-ansible
Currently
it uses private dns name, eg, ip-10-2-7-121.ap-southeast-2.compute.internal
but that isn't
anced_install.html
> that shows how to define the master/etcd/nodes, and those names should be
> used as the hostnames in the cluster.
>
>
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Joel Pearson
> *S
It’s in the paas repo
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin/
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 at 1:09 am, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> I just starting hitting this error when using the ansible installer
> (installing v3.70 from openshift-ansible on branch release-3.7).
It’s also worth mentioning that the console is not haproxy. That is the
router, which run on the infrastructure nodes. The console/api server runs
something else.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 at 1:46 am, Fabio Martinelli <
fabio.martinelli.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It was actually needed to rewrite the
Hi,
I just wanted to find out if
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible-contrib/tree/master/playbooks/provisioning/openstack
is
still the most current for deploying OpenShift on OpenStack?
I had a read of
- if you still see
> the master IP in that list after 15s then something else is wrong.
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running OpenShift 3.9 on AWS with masters in HA mode usin
You’re probably after pod anti-affinity?
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/#affinity-and-anti-affinity
That lets you tell the scheduler that the pods aren’t allowed to be on the
same node for example.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 8:51 pm, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> I've got a
Here’s an OpenShift reference for the same thing.
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/admin_guide/scheduling/pod_affinity.html
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 9:14 pm, Joel Pearson
wrote:
> You’re probably after pod anti-affinity?
> https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/
Complete stab in the dark, but maybe your OpenStack account doesn’t have
enough privileges to be able to complete an install?
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 at 9:46 pm, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> I'm still having problems getting the OpenStack cloud provider running.
>
> I have a minimal
trying to do something in OpenStack
> but this is failing.
>
> But what is it trying to do?
>
> On 17/01/18 10:49, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
> Complete stab in the dark, but maybe your OpenStack account doesn’t have
> enough privileges to be able to complete an install?
> On W
You could edit the
openshift-ansible\playbooks\common\openshift-node\restart.yml and add:
max_fail_percentage: 0
under
serial: "{{ openshift_restart_nodes_serial | default(1) }}"
That, in theory, should make it fail straight away.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:46 PM Alan Christie <
“Distributed-Three-way replication is the only supported volume type.”
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.2/html/container-native_storage_for_openshift_container_platform/ch03s02
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 12:00 am, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
>
You’d have to run your Gluster cluster separate from OpenShift if you want
a different volume type I’m guessing.
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 12:15 am, Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah!, that's a shame.
>
> Tim
>
> On 28/03/18 14:11, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
A quick google found this:
https://karlstoney.com/2017/03/01/fuse-mount-in-kubernetes/
It looks like the approach would work for you too. But it’s worth
mentioning that he’s doing the mount from within the container, so he needs
the pod to start as a privileged pod. You can do that in open shift
Do you have a Redhat subscription? If not, you shouldn’t be trying to
install OCP but rather Origin. If you don’t have a subscription configured
then that’d probably explain why it can’t find the rpms.
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 at 8:35 pm, Lukas Budiman wrote:
> I am really
Are you using calico or something like that? If so why not consider a
regular overlay network just to get it working?
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 at 5:26 am, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> A little more on this.
> One the nodes that are not working the file
>
Is the OpenShift Origin 3.9.0 release imminent? I noticed the tag appeared
4 days ago, but without any detail yet:
https://github.com/openshift/origin/releases
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
What do you want Nginx for? OpenShift has a component called the Router
which routes traffic. It is based on Haproxy. You could run an nginx
container that the router will send traffic to, but if you’re just trying
to expose other apps. Then just use the built in Router.
Unless you’re talking
Sounds like your DNS configuration is a bit weird. Do you control the DNS
server where you put that myapps domain? How did you figure the nodes to
use DNS?
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 at 3:47 pm, abdul nizam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have 2 nodes and one master.
> I have installed OSE
I had this at one point, but it was before I cared about the data in that
cluster so I just rebuilt it, so you could just rebuild your cluster ;)
But in all seriousness sounds like you need to do some etcd surgery, but I
have no idea how that works.
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 at 4:00 am, bahhooo
sing it.
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, 9:43 AM Joel Pearson <japear...@agiledigital.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> What do you want Nginx for? OpenShift has a component called the Router
>> which routes traffic. It is based on Haproxy. You could run an nginx
>> container tha
My guess is that you’ve probably got some antivirus software interfering.
I’d recommend disabling all antivirus software and seeing if the
performance improves. It’s very slow for me at one of my client sites, but
I’ve discovered so is Cygwin in general, so I think it’s related to the
Symantec
and why this fix became necessary.
>
> On 07/10/18 21:14, Joel Pearson wrote:
>
> Have you tried looking at the generated haproxy file inside the router? It
> might give some hints as to what went wrong. I presume you’ve already tried
> recreating the route?
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 a
ent but
> was too focused on searching for a CloudFormation template. I'll go back to
> the reference architecture which I'm sure will answer at least some of my
> questions.
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:24 PM Joel Pearson
> wrote:
>
>> Have you seen the AWS re
Have you tried looking at the generated haproxy file inside the router? It
might give some hints as to what went wrong. I presume you’ve already tried
recreating the route?
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 2:30 am, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
> We've hit a problem with a HTTPS route that used to work fine has now
>
Have you seen the AWS reference architecture?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/reference_architectures/2018/html/deploying_and_managing_openshift_3.9_on_amazon_web_services/index#
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 3:11 am, Peter Heitman wrote:
> I've created a CloudFormation Stack for simple
It looks like not, I found some references saying that Kubernetes has alpha
support in 1.9 and some improvements in 1.10
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/1443
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/62822
I did find this article suggesting that you might be able to use
Clayton, does this mean that in OpenShift 4.0 you'd be able to take a
vanilla kubernetes installation and then install a bunch of OpenShift
operators and basically have an OpenShift cluster? Or is that not really
the goal of migration to operators? Is it just to make future OpenShift
releases
Oh, it looks like it's read-only in 3.11:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652536
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 22:49, Joel Pearson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the grafana instance in OpenShift 3.11 in the openshift-monitoring
> project.
>
> I'm wondering how do I mod
Hi,
I found the grafana instance in OpenShift 3.11 in the openshift-monitoring
project.
I'm wondering how do I modify the dashboards? It seems to be in read-only
mode.
I'm a cluster-admin so I thought that it would give me write access.
I'm guessing there is another role that gives that
I think it's worth mentioning here that the RPMs at
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin311/ have a
critical security vulnerability, I think it's unsafe to use the RPMs if
you're planning on having your cluster available on the internet.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 8:01 am, mabi wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 12:28 PM, Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au> wrote:
>
> I think it's worth mentioning here that the RPMs at
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x8
:13 PM, Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au> wrote:
>
> It looks like the RPMs will eventually get the security fix according to
> the other reply from Daniel Comnea. But with containers you could have a
> fix within a day as opposed to waiting for new tag which still has
Why not use an ansible installation for a single node instead? Then you can let
ansible configure everything properly for you.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 28 Feb 2019, at 9:02 am, Pavel Maslov wrote:
>
> With my original question, I meant how can I secure the Web Console (I was
> able to
With CodeReady Container, it's not possible to use it without
virtualisation right? Because it needs CoreOS, and can't startup on an
existing docker installation like you can with "oc cluster up"?
I'm only asking because I almost got OKD 3.11 running on Windows 10 WSL
(windows subsystem for
re is no more all-in-one containerized support for OpenShift so
>> more 'oc cluster up' for OpenShift 4.x.
>>
>> []s, Fernando Lozano
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:44 AM Joel Pearson <
>> japear...@agiledigital.com.au> wrote:
>>
>&g
l:7.7" as "registry.redhat.io/ubi7-minimal:7.7":
Error initializing source docker://registry.redhat.io/ubi7-minimal:7.7:
pinging docker registry returned: Get https://registry.redhat.io/v2/: x509:
certificate signed by unknown authority
Thanks,
Joel
--
Kind Regards,
Joel Pearson
Agile Digit
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 12:26 am, Ben Parees wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 1:17 AM Joel Pearson <
> japear...@agiledigital.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m trying to build an image in Openshift 4.2 where my internet has an
>> MITM proxy.
>&
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 13:05, Clayton Coleman wrote:
> Raise a bug to the installler component, yes
>
Ok thanks, I raised a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773419
> On Nov 17, 2019, at 6:03 PM, Joel Pearson
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 12:37,
So, I'm running OpenShift 4.2 on Azure UPI following this blog article:
https://blog.openshift.com/openshift-4-1-upi-environment-deployment-on-microsoft-azure-cloud/
with
a few customisations on the terraform side.
One of the main differences it seems, is how the router/ingress is handled.
Normal
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo