Re: Satellite instead of subscription-manager PLEASE HELP (BLOCKED)

2016-10-14 Thread Jason DeTiberus
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Dean Peterson 
wrote:

> I went to the link: "https://access.redhat.com/rhn-to-rhsm;. It says
> satellite users should be unaffected. I'm a little confused. I'm using
> satellite, but when I type subscription-manager register it says i'm
> registered. However, when I run "subscription-manager attach --auto", it
> spins for a while then says I am not registered.
>


The tooling hits separate systems, so register is showing that you are
registered, but only because the RHN tooling is configured and reports it's
registered. Attach tries to attach subscriptions from RHSM and will fail
because the RHSM system does not manage the system.



> We pay a lot of money for Openshift Enterprise and it will not work
> without upgrading our entire satellite system?
>

For the host subscription/entitlement information to be propagated into the
container, it would either require the host be subscribed to Satellite 6 or
the hosted subscription management service.


> Right now we are on version 5.5 of satellite. There is no way to make this
> work with our existing setup?
>

Possible options I can think of off the top of my head:
- Subscribe OpenShift systems directly to Subscription Manager, instead of
Satellite 5.5
- Access packages through a reposync'd mirror:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/9892, and configure the mirror as part
of the container build.

I'd suggest contacting support and/or account manager, since they may know
of other options available and could potentially help advocate for adding
Satellite 5 support.

--
Jason



>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Jason DeTiberus 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Dean Peterson 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Our machines use rhn classic. If I try to run subscription-manager
>>> register it says I am already registered with redhat classic. However, this
>>> does seem to be compatible with Docker and Openshift. Operations wants to
>>> stick with redhat classic and satellite. Is this possible?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think this is currently possible, the entitlement/subscription
>> mapping is done through a set of plugins that are specific to
>> subscription-manager. With RHN Classic approaching end of life (
>> https://access.redhat.com/rhn-to-rhsm) I don't really see that changing,
>> but you could always reach out to support to file a formal RFE.
>>
>> --
>> Jason DeTiberus
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Kent Perrier 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 subscription-manager is used to register your host to your local
 satellite as well. How are you patching your hosts if they are not
 registered?

 Kent

 On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Dean Peterson  wrote:

> Can anyone please help? We use satellite for access to our software.
> We do not use subscription-manager. Unfortunately when running docker
> builds, the containers cannot access the hosts registries because they
> expect to access auto attached subscription-manager subscriptions
> How is openshift supposed to work with satellite instead of
> subscription-manager?
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
>


 --
 Kent Perrier
 Technical Account Manager


>>
>


-- 
Jason DeTiberus
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users


Re: Satellite instead of subscription-manager PLEASE HELP (BLOCKED)

2016-10-14 Thread Dean Peterson
I went to the link: "https://access.redhat.com/rhn-to-rhsm;. It says
satellite users should be unaffected. I'm a little confused. I'm using
satellite, but when I type subscription-manager register it says i'm
registered. However, when I run "subscription-manager attach --auto", it
spins for a while then says I am not registered. We pay a lot of money for
Openshift Enterprise and it will not work without upgrading our entire
satellite system? Right now we are on version 5.5 of satellite. There is no
way to make this work with our existing setup?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Jason DeTiberus 
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Dean Peterson 
> wrote:
>
>> Our machines use rhn classic. If I try to run subscription-manager
>> register it says I am already registered with redhat classic. However, this
>> does seem to be compatible with Docker and Openshift. Operations wants to
>> stick with redhat classic and satellite. Is this possible?
>>
>
> I don't think this is currently possible, the entitlement/subscription
> mapping is done through a set of plugins that are specific to
> subscription-manager. With RHN Classic approaching end of life (
> https://access.redhat.com/rhn-to-rhsm) I don't really see that changing,
> but you could always reach out to support to file a formal RFE.
>
> --
> Jason DeTiberus
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Kent Perrier 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> subscription-manager is used to register your host to your local
>>> satellite as well. How are you patching your hosts if they are not
>>> registered?
>>>
>>> Kent
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Dean Peterson 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Can anyone please help? We use satellite for access to our software. We
 do not use subscription-manager. Unfortunately when running docker builds,
 the containers cannot access the hosts registries because they expect to
 access auto attached subscription-manager subscriptions
 How is openshift supposed to work with satellite instead of
 subscription-manager?

 ___
 users mailing list
 users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
 http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kent Perrier
>>> Technical Account Manager
>>>
>>>
>
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users


Re: Satellite instead of subscription-manager PLEASE HELP (BLOCKED)

2016-10-13 Thread Jason DeTiberus
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Dean Peterson 
wrote:

> Our machines use rhn classic. If I try to run subscription-manager
> register it says I am already registered with redhat classic. However, this
> does seem to be compatible with Docker and Openshift. Operations wants to
> stick with redhat classic and satellite. Is this possible?
>

I don't think this is currently possible, the entitlement/subscription
mapping is done through a set of plugins that are specific to
subscription-manager. With RHN Classic approaching end of life (
https://access.redhat.com/rhn-to-rhsm) I don't really see that changing,
but you could always reach out to support to file a formal RFE.

--
Jason DeTiberus


>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Kent Perrier  wrote:
>
>> subscription-manager is used to register your host to your local
>> satellite as well. How are you patching your hosts if they are not
>> registered?
>>
>> Kent
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Dean Peterson 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone please help? We use satellite for access to our software. We
>>> do not use subscription-manager. Unfortunately when running docker builds,
>>> the containers cannot access the hosts registries because they expect to
>>> access auto attached subscription-manager subscriptions
>>> How is openshift supposed to work with satellite instead of
>>> subscription-manager?
>>>
>>> ___
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
>>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kent Perrier
>> Technical Account Manager
>>
>>
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users