Hi Slava,
I see this is a sequential NOTIFY, so probably part of a SUBSCRIBE'ing
session. If so, you need to route it as a generic sequential request via
loose_route() + t_relay().
Does the SUBSCRIBE go via your OpenSIPS ? do you do record_route() for it ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Dimitry,
What is the point of this email ? I see the ticket is opened some time
ago and there is someone already working on it .
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2019
Hi Bogdan-Andrei,
The main point is got help with resolving the issue ASAP. I’m sorry if it
sounds boring, but the issue is critical for me. And I understand that guys in
the project very busy, so I try to get user’s helps.
Have a good day.
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi, Ahmed!
None of the module supports this by themselves, but you can achieve this
for each of them using existing tools:
* for event_rabbitmq, you can put multiple rabbitmq subscribers in an
event_virtual handler
* for rabbitmq you can test in the script if the command was
successfully sent
Hi,
this is the fallback to the next destination in my script:
failure_route[GW_FAILOVER] {
if (t_was_cancelled()) {
xlog("L_INF","*** Was cancelled \n");
exit;
}
# failure detection with redirect to next available trunk
if
Great !
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2019
https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2019Amsterdam/
On 03/13/2019 02:30 PM, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Bogdan,
Issue has being resolved.
NOTIFY is routed properly right
Fair enough, why not.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2019
https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2019Amsterdam/
On 03/13/2019 11:48 AM, Dmitry wrote:
Hi Bogdan-Andrei,
The main point is got help with
Dears, some of our sip peers complaint that we sent in our SDP contains two 'c='
v=0.
o=- 1552491282093 1 IN IP4 192.168.104.200.
s=Our Local Private Media Server.
c=IN IP4 **192.168.104.200.**
t=0 0.
m=audio 36356 RTP/AVP 8 0 101.
c=IN IP4 **Public.Interface.RTPPRoxy.**
a=sendrecv.
a=rtcp:36357
Ahmed Shabana would like to recall the message, "RabbitMQ high availability ".
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Dears, First sorry it you received the below content of this email with wrong
subject
The issue we face with some of our sip peers complaint that we sent in our SDP
contains two 'c='
v=0.
o=- 1552491282093 1 IN IP4 192.168.104.200.
s=Our Local Private Media Server.
c=IN IP4
Ahmed,
In theory:
You can configure RabbitMQ as a 2+ node (although i'd start with 3 nodes)
highly available cluster, and depending on how you configure it you can get
it to the point where it doesn't matter about which node you publish to to
get the message into the right exchange, all you need
11 matches
Mail list logo
