Dear QE users,
I'm trying to reproduce the Li adsorbed graphene with DFT-D2 using QE. The
adsorption energy is very much underestimated (-0.66 eV/Li) as compared to
the values found in the literature. My SIESTA vdW-DF/DZP value is -1.11
eV/Li, pretty much in agreement with the literature. I have u
Dear QE users,
I'm trying to reproduce the Li adsorbed graphene with DFT-D2 using QE. The
adsorption energy is very much underestimated (-0.66 eV/Li) as compared to
the values found in the literature. My SIESTA vdW-DF/DZP value is -1.11
eV/Li, pretty much in agreement with the literature. I have u
Dear qe users,
I'm a qe beginner, therefore, came up with a simple question. If i have to
study the interaction of Li/Na with graphene, so in this case how will i
choose the ecutwfc value? Should i do a convergence test w.r.t ecutwfc for
pure graphene or I must check the convergence of Li adsorbed
Dear Madhurya,
1) You just need to go through the high symmetry points. The link may be
useful: http://web.mit.edu/xcrysden_v1.5.60/www/XCRYSDEN/doc/kpath.html)
2) Fermi energy is important. You can use grep Fermi filename-scf.out, The
other values are for the energy range and how it will be div
Dear QE users,
I have studied that now VDW-DF (non-local) is implemented in QE. To use
this, you just need to change the input_dft accordingly. I also read that
you need revPBE for vdW-df calculations. I was not able to find the revPBE
PPs. My question is, can we use PBE PPs if we are interested i
How to decide that? For inverse spinel (CuFe2O4) with FCC structure (56
atoms), what is the minimum number of K point (approx) required?
There is no such thing like minimum or maximum. You need to look at your
bands. If it is smooth, then the number is fine. To be on a safer side, I
would recommen
Dear QE users,
I'm interested in using vdW-df in QE. My simple question is: Can we use PBE
PPs by just changing the input_dft parameter from pbe to vdW-DF etc, just
like we do in VASP? Or we need to generate a vdW-DF PPs the way we generate
for use in SIESTA? Or we need to use revPBE pps?
Can som
Dear Paolo/Karim,
Thank you very much for your prompt response. Actually, you missed the
first part of my question. Can we use PBE pps by just changing the
input_dft? Of course, the generate_vdw_kernel_table should be present. We
use VDW-DF-SIESTA and M06 etc in Gaussian and sometimes we also use
As per my limited knowledge, only one option can be used. vdW-df is
non-local, so it does not need C6 etc.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Eleftheria Gkogkosi
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it acceptable to set input_dft='vdw-DF' and then also use
> vdw_corr='DFT-D' in order to adjust london_c6(1) para
Dear QE users,
Can we use vdW-DF-c09x with revPBE pps or we need to build vdW-DF-c09x pp?
Previously, I was told that no one generate PPs with vdW-df and in the
funct.f90, I haven't found even a closer functional.
Thanks
Regards
Saif
Department of physics, UFJF, Brazil
_
Dear all,
I have solved the problem.
Thanks
Saif
Department of Physics, UFJF, Brazil
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Saif Ullah wrote:
> Dear QE users,
>
> I'm trying to reproduce the Li adsorption on a benzene ring reported in
> this paper (Chemical Physics Letters 573 (2
Dear QE users,
I'm trying to reproduce the Li adsorption on a benzene ring reported in
this paper (Chemical Physics Letters 573 (2013) 15–18) using vdW-DF. The
calculations stopped without printing any error in the output file. The
input and output files are attached in addition to the error file
Dear,
Ebin = Etot - ENi - EBi - 3EO
Or depends on how you write.
For stability, you need to calculate phonons.
Regards
Saif
Dept. Physics, UFJF, Brazil
On 14 Nov 2017 6:51 am, "Sudha Priyanka" wrote:
> Can anyone suggest how to calculate binding energy of my crystal NaBiO3 by
> using Quantum
Also, keep in mind that the value (-/+) depends on the order of the
equation.
Regards
Saif
Dept. Physics, UFJF, Brazil
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Rajesh wrote:
> Dear Saif Ullah,
> The negative value of binding energy is not enough to predict stability?
> Why do we need phonon ca
oncept. If energy of
individual atoms is more than the compound, the compound is more stable and
vice-versa.
On Nov 14, 2017 19:01, "Saif Ullah" wrote:
> I'm not aware of the system under study, but if it is a new material, then
> one should calculate phonons to check the stability.
One quick question. Did you already optimize the structure using relax
or vc-relax?
Regards
Saif
Department of physics, UFJF, Brazil
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Dhara Raval
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> my name is Dhara i'm M.Phil student from gujarat university
> ,India and workin
Dear Mohammad,
Would you like share your inputs...
The following link may be helpful.
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/2009-August/013787.html
Regards
Saif
Department of Physics, UFJF, Brazil
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Ubaid Mohd wrote:
> Dear QE users:
>
> A davcio error ca
Dear Boulet,
I think I found where the error is. You are using the atomic number of In
instead of its atomic mass.
Regards
Saif
Department of physics, UFJF, Brazil
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Pascal Boulet
wrote:
> Thanks Lorenzo for the suggestion. I have tried with Ecut=120 Ry and
> Ec
east for simple
> III-V compounds like InAs. I would examine the effect of a denser k-point
> grid, and of spin-orbit
>
> Paolo
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Saif Ullah wrote:
>
>> Dear Boulet,
>>
>> I think I found where the error is. You are
UPF
> Iit is used only by molecular dynamics, not by structural optimization.
>
> I don't remember In to be an especially nasty element, at least for
> simple III-V compounds like InAs. I would examine the effect of a denser
> k-point grid, and of spin-orbit
>
> Paol
It is a well-known error.
The following links may be helpful.
http://qe-forge.org/pipermail/pw_forum/2014-September/105225.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/pw_forum@pwscf.org/msg29759.html
Regards
Saif
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:38 AM, B S Bhushan wrote:
> Dear experts...
>
> I have received
opinion to insist: your system is sufficiently
relaxed
Paolo)
I'm surely not a QE expert but when I have this kind of problem, I usually
change (a bit) the positions of few atoms and do a relax calculation
following by an scf-calc.
Regards
Saif
Saif Ullah
Departamento de Física
Institu
In addition, looking to the celldm, don't you think that a 15x10x1 mesh or
so can be a reasonable choice?
On 12 Jan 2018 4:51 am, "NEELESH GUPTA" wrote:
> Dear Jagdish,
> Yes sir you are right. Please consider it as a typo
> error.
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Jagdi
Or you can take a look at
cell_dofree tag
Regards
Saif Ullah
Departamento de Física
Instituto de Ciências Exatas - ICE
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF
Juiz de Fora - MG - Brazil - CEP 36036-330
sul...@fisica.ufjf.br
Cell# +55 32 9110-7851
https://www.researchgate.net/profile
Would you like to share your band structure plots?
We haven't found such differences using different codes (siesta, gaussian,
qe, vasp). It is difficult to say anything without looking at the bands,
but i guess you are working with borophene.
Regards
Saif Ullah
Departamento de Física
Inst
The following link might be helpful.
http://larrucea.eu/sum_states-py-2/
Regards
Saif
Saif Ullah
Departamento de Física
Instituto de Ciências Exatas - ICE
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF
Juiz de Fora - MG - Brazil - CEP 36036-330
sul...@fisica.ufjf.br
Cell# +55 32 9110-7851
https
Dear Eleni,
Did you use ibrav=0? If so, then you need to use q_in_band_form=.false.
q_in_cryst_coord=.true.
You can get the path using Xcrysden
Best,
Saif Ullah
Departamento de Física
Instituto de Ciências Exatas - ICE
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF
Juiz de Fora - MG - Brazil
27 matches
Mail list logo