such as I would do when
using standard TDDFT codes.
I'd like to know if this is indeed possible and, if so, I'd appreciate some
information on how to do it.
All my best,
Dr. Sergi Vela,
Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique, Universitè de Strasbourg, France
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Timrov Iurii <iurii.tim...@epfl.ch>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Dr. Sergi Vela,
>>
>>
>> With the current implementation of the Lanczos algorithm in the
>> turboTDDFT program it is not possible to perform analysis
evolution of the SCF energy, you'll see that is awful).
Anyone has experience on modeling such king of systems?
Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance
Dr. Sergi Vela,
University of Strasbourg, France.
Test.input
Description: Binary data
Summary.out
Description: Binary data
ay try not to bias the
> tot_magnetization variable.
>
> Finally, ecutwfc=25.0 seems a bit too low. It could be a source of
> instability. I would use something around 35/280 Ry for ecutwfc and ecutrho.
>
> HTH
> Giuseppe
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:57:23 AM Se
ial to set up
>> the occupation for the whole system, however rather than for separate
>> parts.
>>
>> Is there a way to make this setting?
>> 2015 年 2 月 3 日 下午 9:38于 "xiaochuan Ge" <ustc.scg...@gmail.com>写道:
>>
>> Dear Sergi Vela,
>>&
I managed to converge the calculation. There was an error on the structure
caused by the software that I used. Without your help I couldn't have seen
it. Your advices regarding convergence will also be very helpful.
Thanks,
Sergi
2015-02-03 15:40 GMT+01:00 Sergi Vela <sergi.v...@gmail.
n it
using version 4.2.1 I don't get any error.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
Sergi Vela,
University of Strasbourg
SURF.input
Description: Binary data
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
gamma 120.
Thanks! For your help and specially for creating this code, I've been
working with it quite some time and I'm very satisfied overall.
Sergi
2015-02-13 14:38 GMT+01:00 Paolo Giannozzi <paolo.gianno...@uniud.it>:
> On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 11:23 +0100, Sergi Vela wrote
Dear Colleagues,
Just to report that I'm having exactly the same problem with DFT+U. The
same message is appearing randomly only when I use the Hubbard term. I
could test versions 5.2 and 6.0 and it occurs in both.
All my best,
Sergi
2015-07-16 18:43 GMT+02:00 Paolo Giannozzi
e information on where this message come from is supplied,
> there is close to nothing that can be done
>
> Paolo
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Sergi Vela <sergi.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> Just to report that I'm having exactly the sa
ually help.
Bests,
Sergi
2016-11-23 16:13 GMT+01:00 Sergi Vela <sergi.v...@gmail.com>:
> Dear Paolo,
>
> Unfortunately, there's not much to report so far. Many "relax" jobs for a
> system of ca. 500 atoms (including Fe) fail giving the same m
ther
users may experience it as well.
2016-12-01 18:43 GMT+01:00 Paolo Giannozzi <p.gianno...@gmail.com>:
> "underflows"? They should never be a problem, unless you instruct the
> compiler (by activating some obscure flag) to catch them.
>
> Paolo
>
> On Thu,
this information somehow
in the newer versions?
Bests,
Dr. Sergi Vela
Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique,
University of Strasbourg, France
__
!total energy =-143.62326230 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate =-143.62326230 Ry
estimated scf accuracy
13 matches
Mail list logo