Re: [strongSwan] strongswan-5.1.1 routing pb

Hi, The configuration is quite classical: net-to-net ( 192.168.3.0/24 === 192.168.4.0/24 ) msc-hmnet{5}: INSTALLED, TUNNEL, ESP SPIs: c5329687_i c0101bc4_o, IPCOMP CPIs: dcf5_i ab46_o But out of the 2 tunnels only 1 is reachable. The other one doesn't ping. [root@academ strongswan]#

[strongSwan] Centos6.5, building SS 5.1.1 or 5.1.2dr2 fails

Hello I'm have built strongswan rpm's with mock in Centos 6.5 (2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64). Building 5.1.0 works okay, but 5.1.1 or 5.1.2dr2 does not. Any ideas, what should I do to get it to build? Best Regards, Kimmo Mockbuild: mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Plo libtool: compile: gcc

Re: [strongSwan] Centos6.5, building SS 5.1.1 or 5.1.2dr2 fails

Hi Kimmo, I'm have built strongswan rpm's with mock in Centos 6.5 (2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64). Building 5.1.0 works okay, but 5.1.1 or 5.1.2dr2 does not. from networking/tun_device.c:51: /usr/include/linux/if_ether.h:125: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before

Re: [strongSwan] Centos6.5, building SS 5.1.1 or 5.1.2dr2 fails

Hi Martin Did not help, is there any other patches for this issue? Regards, Kimmo Script started on Wed 18 Dec 2013 09:37:45 PM EET ]0;yes@build-server:~/rpm/SOURCES/tmp/strongswan-5.1.1[?1034h[yes@build-server strongswan-5.1.1]$ cat ../../strongswan-centos6.patch ---

Re: [strongSwan] Win7 IKEv1 L2TP rekeying fails

Hi Lars, which kernel version do you use? There was a bug in the l2tp_core module in some kernel versions before v3.3 which may explain your problem with dropped packets after rekeying.

Re: [strongSwan] Win7 IKEv1 L2TP rekeying fails

Yeaa, thats it! The workaround 'fixes' the issue. Thanks alot! Lars Am 18.12.13 21:09, schrieb Volker Rümelin: Hi Lars, which kernel version do you use? There was a bug in the l2tp_core module in some kernel versions before v3.3 which may explain your problem with dropped packets after