[strongSwan] Abbreviations

2016-10-13 Thread Brian O'Connor
Hi, In the logging output of IKE exchanges, the terms [ HASH CPRQ(X_USER X_PWD) ] [ HASH CPRP(X_USER X_PWD) ] are often encountered. What does CPRQ and CPRP stand for, please? Is there a dictionary of strongSwan abbreviations somewhere? TIA, Brian __

Re: [strongSwan] Abbreviations

2016-10-13 Thread Andreas Steffen
Hi Brian, CPRQ stands for Configuration Payload Request and CPRP for Configuration Payload Response. The following link defines the long and short form for the various IKE payloads: https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/blob/master/src/libcharon/encoding/payloads/payload.c and here the same

[strongSwan] Unable to establish VPN tunnel from China (Strongswan IKEv2)

2016-10-13 Thread Oliver Söder
I set up a IKEv2 server which works fine with clients from Europe. A connection from China fails, log of an unsuccessful attempt is at the end of this email. And please excuse me if the log is too long, it is the first time I set up such an environment (one week ago). Can I do some changes at the

Re: [strongSwan] Unable to establish VPN tunnel from China (Strongswan IKEv2)

2016-10-13 Thread Tianjie Mao
Hi, From my personal experience it looks like the other party did not send back a certificate as requested by this host, or the packet got lost on the network. IKE packets can be as large as 3,000 bytes, and China's Internet is known to have Path MTU "black holes" [1]. Please try ECDSA certifi

Re: [strongSwan] Unable to establish VPN tunnel from China (Strongswan IKEv2)

2016-10-13 Thread Noel Kuntze
On 13.10.2016 13:01, Oliver Söder wrote: > Oct 10 14:54:16 Ubuntu-1604-xenial-64-minimal charon: 01[NET] sending packet: > from 172.31.1.100[500] to 114.219.152.248[56667] (337 bytes) > Oct 10 14:54:16 Ubuntu-1604-xenial-64-minimal charon: 10[NET] sending packet: > from 172.31.1.100[500] to 114.2

[strongSwan] Problem: strongswan 5.4 with sha2

2016-10-13 Thread fatcharly
Hi, I´m using a strongswan-5.4.0-2.el7.x86_64 on a CentOS 7. I´m trying to build a VPN connection with the following proposals: ike: RSA, DH20, AES256/SHA-2 esp: DH-14, AES256/SHA-2 I`ve tried it with this: ike=aes256-sha256-ecp384 esp=aes256-sha256-modp2048 but its not working. WHich would be

Re: [strongSwan] Problem: strongswan 5.4 with sha2

2016-10-13 Thread Noel Kuntze
On 13.10.2016 17:28, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > I´m using a strongswan-5.4.0-2.el7.x86_64 on a CentOS 7. I´m trying to build > a VPN connection with the following proposals: > ike: RSA, DH20, AES256/SHA-2 > esp: DH-14, AES256/SHA-2 > > I`ve tried it with this: > ike=aes256-sha256-ecp384

Re: [strongSwan] Problem: strongswan 5.4 with sha2

2016-10-13 Thread fatcharly
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2016 um 17:32 Uhr > Von: "Noel Kuntze" > An: fatcha...@gmx.de, "Users strongswan" > Betreff: Re: [strongSwan] Problem: strongswan 5.4 with sha2 > > On 13.10.2016 17:28, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I´m using a strongswan-5.4.0-2.el7.x86_64 on a Ce

Re: [strongSwan] Problem: strongswan 5.4 with sha2

2016-10-13 Thread Noel Kuntze
On 13.10.2016 17:40, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote: > conn siteA > left=my IP > leftsubnet=my Subnet > leftid=my IP > right=site A IP > rightsubnet=site A subnet > rightid=site A ip > authby=secret > auto=start > ikelifetime=28800s >