Re: [strongSwan] traffic beyond initiator yes, but no between initiator & server

2020-11-06 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hi Lejeczek, > I do not see, not on the server nor on initiator, any tun > devices created, unless an 'ipsec0' is such one iface. It's > the only iface I see made by strongswan's libipsec. Device names are arbitrary and thus not useful for identifying the type of interface. the ipsec0 device is

Re: [strongSwan] traffic beyond initiator yes, but no between initiator & server

2020-11-05 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hello Lejeczek, kernel-libipsec (which is required to be loaded for libipsec to be usable) creates a tun interface itself. You can not prescribe it to use one. > mode = pass That disables all IPsec processing for traffic that matches the policies. You probably don't want to do that.

Re: [strongSwan] traffic beyond initiator yes, but no between initiator & server

2020-11-05 Thread lejeczek
On 05/11/2020 17:19, Noel Kuntze wrote: > Hello Lejeczek, > > kernel-libipsec (which is required to be loaded for libipsec to be usable) > creates a tun interface itself. You can not prescribe it to use one. I do not see, not on the server nor on initiator, any tun devices created, unless an