Re: [Users] Comverse MMSC & SMIL problem
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 08:57:49AM +0300, abdirezak musse yusuf wrote: > > please send to me too. sent pgp6xMLLRteWc.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Comverse MMSC & SMIL problem
please send to me too. Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:09:27 +0100 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Users] Comverse MMSC & SMIL problem On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 06:12:08PM +0300, Paul Bagyenda wrote: > > Piotr, > > A trace of what works and what doesn't might be useful here. > > Paul. Sure. I have complete tcpdump records for both situations. I don't want to pollute the list so I'll send it directly to you. If someone else would be willing to look at it, just let me know. ___ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Comverse MMSC & SMIL problem
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 06:12:08PM +0300, Paul Bagyenda wrote: > > Piotr, > > A trace of what works and what doesn't might be useful here. > > Paul. Sure. I have complete tcpdump records for both situations. I don't want to pollute the list so I'll send it directly to you. If someone else would be willing to look at it, just let me know. pgpYFR8gZ6z52.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Comverse MMSC & SMIL problem
Piotr, A trace of what works and what doesn't might be useful here. Paul. On Dec 19, 2011, at 17:58, Piotr Isajew wrote: > Hi, > > About a month ago I started to have problems with one of > operators when sending via MM1 interface... They accept > m-send-reqs and properly respond with m-send-confs. > > The problem is that when message contains SMIL it isn't delivered > to the destination address. If I send plain text, or image > message (without SMIL) it's being delivered correctly. > > SMIL messages sent via other operators' MMSCs are handled > correctly. > > I suspect that the problem here is caused by a kind of software > upgrade/reconfiguration on the operator's side. I'm unable to > verify this with them however. It appears that their Customer > Care Department has been hired as a firewall between the > customer and the rest of the company. My most successful > conversation with them resulted in sending me configuration > messages for MMS service ;/ > > I've spent a lot of time experimenting with various combinations > of m-send-req and SMIL contents. It appears that whether the > message is being handled properly or not depends on SMIL > presence. > > Maybe someone had similar problems and would like to comment on > this? > > Response headers tell me that their current gateway is Comverse > 4.5 > > Regards, > > Piotr > ___ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Comverse MMSC & SMIL problem
Hi, About a month ago I started to have problems with one of operators when sending via MM1 interface... They accept m-send-reqs and properly respond with m-send-confs. The problem is that when message contains SMIL it isn't delivered to the destination address. If I send plain text, or image message (without SMIL) it's being delivered correctly. SMIL messages sent via other operators' MMSCs are handled correctly. I suspect that the problem here is caused by a kind of software upgrade/reconfiguration on the operator's side. I'm unable to verify this with them however. It appears that their Customer Care Department has been hired as a firewall between the customer and the rest of the company. My most successful conversation with them resulted in sending me configuration messages for MMS service ;/ I've spent a lot of time experimenting with various combinations of m-send-req and SMIL contents. It appears that whether the message is being handled properly or not depends on SMIL presence. Maybe someone had similar problems and would like to comment on this? Response headers tell me that their current gateway is Comverse 4.5 Regards, Piotr pgpR3vFKHayQe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users
