Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

Done. I also created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-452. Niklas On Wed 2018-03-07 at 12:30h, cowwoc wrote on users: > PSA: Please move discussion over to > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-447 :) > > Thank you, > Gili > > On 2018-03-07 9:48 AM, Niklas Matthies

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

PSA: Please move discussion over to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-447 :) Thank you, Gili On 2018-03-07 9:48 AM, Niklas Matthies wrote: I'm not sure why there should be an option here, instead of always inserting the non-qualified name for imported names. There is no option

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

Please add your comments to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-447 Thank you, Gili On 2018-03-07 3:51 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: I expected that to be an option either in the "Code Completion" section or maybe the "Formatter" section for JavaDocs. Btw: The fully qualified path

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

I'm not sure why there should be an option here, instead of always inserting the non-qualified name for imported names. There is no option for inserting fully qualified names in regular Java code either. IMHO the javadoc code completion should just work the same way as the code completion in

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

I expected that to be an option either in the "Code Completion" section or maybe the "Formatter" section for JavaDocs. Btw: The fully qualified path is not necessary in the JavaDocs if that class is already imported. The class names in the JavaDocs share the same "visibility" rules as regular

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

Hi, I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-447 Gili On 2018-03-06 12:34 PM, Paul Szudzik wrote: Hopefully this would be an option flag.. Otherwise I wouldn't know if I was overriding something by accident via a library load.. so, I would vote for option check, where if it was

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

Hopefully this would be an option flag.. Otherwise I wouldn't know if I was overriding something by accident via a library load.. so, I would vote for option check, where if it was CHECKED, would drop the fully qualified class names for base and non-overridden functions.. If I do override a

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

That’s something I’d like to have, too. Regards, Claus > Am 06.03.2018 um 08:42 schrieb Thomas Kellerer : > > When using code-completion in JavaDocs (e.g. for a @see attribute), NetBeans > always inserts fully qualifed class names for parameters, e.g. > > @see

Re: Disabling fully qualified class names in JavDoc completion

I'm also interested in this feature. Gili On 2018-03-06 2:42 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: When using code-completion in JavaDocs (e.g. for a @see attribute), NetBeans always inserts fully qualifed class names for parameters, e.g. @see #someMethod(java.lang.String, java.lang.String) Is it