March 8, 2018 3:44 PM, "Antonio" wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Some comments, then flying to the moon and participating in GSoC.
>
> == 9.0 RC3
>
> For NetBeans 9.0 RC3 the keys were at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/netbeans/KEYS
> as per
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_
Hi John,
Some comments, then flying to the moon and participating in GSoC.
== 9.0 RC3
For NetBeans 9.0 RC3 the keys were at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/netbeans/KEYS
as per
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-netbeans-dev/201802.mbox/browser
== 9.0 Beta
Apologies for the spam, cross posting to dev.
@Antonio, do you know if the link on the website for NetBeans 9.0 Beta is
correct? Looking at this thread, the signature doesn't match the RC3.0
thread we voted on. If we have a small typo we should try to catch this
early in the NetCat phase.
Regar
Hi Leo,
I didn't import the keys, as I had previously done this step...
But
I'm looking at a different file then you:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/
incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-beta/incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-
beta-bin.zip(you)
https://dist.apache.org/re
I got something slightly different...
I have a good signature when verifying the .asc file, but when I do an md5
or sha1 check on the zip file I get different results as to whats currently
on the website:
Johns-MacBook-Pro-2:netbeans_sig_test john$ wget
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incu
Would be good if someone would verify this -- when I look at the VOTE
thread, the source signatures have been verified:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/859cbc7d2f4631983e48e24e7c1053439cbebfee133cc9b3745046b4@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
However, quite possibly the convenience binary signat
