What does that mean? Well as is obvious to you, as time passes, the
number of distributions that are appropriate to use as an OpenVZ host
node is reduced... and it appears that RHEL and CentOS truly are the
best distros to recommend for the host node. As the type of fanboy I
am, that does
On Jan 16, Scott Dowdle dow...@montanalinux.org wrote:
I'm very glad to hear that. Would you recommend that a stock Debian user use
your kernel for OpenVZ stuff? If so, I have to wonder how well it would work
on the upcoming distro releases that Suno was talking about.
Not at all until
I'm very glad to hear that. Would you recommend that a stock Debian
user use your kernel for OpenVZ stuff? If so, I have to wonder how
well it would work on the upcoming distro releases that Suno was
talking about.
Not at all until the new RHEL will be released, because modern versions
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:17:19PM +0100, Suno Ano wrote:
currently (January 2010) mainline is in development for the .33 release,
.32 is stable and used by most Linux Distributions like for example
Debian, Ubuntu, Suse, etc.
From what it looks now Debian and Ubuntu are going into freeze for
On Jan 16, Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
Not at all until the new RHEL will be released, because modern versions
of udev (like the one in Debian testing/unstable) do not support 2.6.18
kernels.
Really, do you have more information on that?
The current version of udev requires a
On Jan 16, Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
Not at all until the new RHEL will be released, because modern
versions
of udev (like the one in Debian testing/unstable) do not support
2.6.18
kernels.
Really, do you have more information on that?
The current version of udev
