Oh, again, this debate always goes on and on :)
Guys, try ZFS yourselves and come back here :)
You obviously haven't seen ARC caching in action. You haven't played
with snapshots. You haven't seen what the online compression can do.
Etc., etc., etc.
There's lots to ZFS, which neither BTRFS
Greetings,
- Original Message -
There's lots to ZFS, which neither BTRFS will ever even remotely
approach.
Not really. That isn't to say that btrfs is done or that all of its features,
especially those added much later in the development cycle, are stable. So, I
don't contend that
Well, innovation isn't about matching features that someone else has
just for the sake of having them too, is it? :)
What lot of people are missing about ZFS is that it is a self-contained
project trying to solve real storage problems. It's not trying to be a
filesystem. It is a complete storage
Hello!
Pavel! Awesome!
Please add one killer feature about ZFS - compete support for SSD with
TRIM and not-killing-this-sector-by-thousands-writes :)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Pavel Snajdr li...@snajpa.net wrote:
Well, innovation isn't about matching features that someone else has
On 11/13/2014 11:20 PM, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
On 11/13/2014 12:52 PM, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
Hello!
Pavel! Awesome!
Please add one killer feature about ZFS - compete support for SSD with
TRIM and not-killing-this-sector-by-thousands-writes :)
Actually ZoL doesn't support TRIM, neither does
