[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 : Can't deploy second node on self hosted engine cluster and host with hosted engine deployed (and also hosted engine VM) is not added to interface

2017-07-07 Thread yayo (j)
Hi at all, I have correctly deployed an hosted engine using node01 via: hosted-engine --deploy Using FC shared storage. Seems all work good but, when I login in to the ovirt web interface I can't find the hosted engine under the VM tab (also the node01 server). So, I have tried to add node02

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 : Can't deploy second node on self hosted engine cluster and host with hosted engine deployed (and also hosted engine VM) is not added to interface

2017-07-07 Thread yayo (j)
on. This should allow you to then put the last host > into maintenance mode. > > However, I think your initial deployment needs to be fixed before adding > more hosts. Hopefully, I or someone else will be able to help you with that > once you've responded with the output from the status

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-20 Thread yayo (j)
Hi, Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N : 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run the > command? Does it complain anything about these files? > No, glustershd.log is clean, no extra log after

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-20 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N : > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected to the 3 > bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using `gluster volume start > engine

[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-19 Thread yayo (j)
Hi all, We have an ovirt cluster hyperconverged with hosted engine on 3 full replicated node . This cluster have 2 gluster volume: - data: volume for the Data (Master) Domain (For vm) - engine: volume fro the hosted_storage Domain (for hosted engine) We have this problem: "engine" gluster

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-21 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-20 14:48 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N : > > But it does say something. All these gfids of completed heals in the log > below are the for the ones that you have given the getfattr output of. So > what is likely happening is there is an intermittent connection problem >

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-21 Thread yayo (j)
on* *user.cifs: off* *storage.owner-gid: 36* *features.shard-block-size: 512MB* *network.ping-timeout: 30* *performance.strict-o-direct: on* *cluster.granular-entry-heal: on* *auth.allow: ** server.allow-insecure: on 2017-07-21 19:13 GMT+02:00 yayo (j) <jag...@gmail.com>: > 2

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-21 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-20 14:48 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N : > > But it does say something. All these gfids of completed heals in the log > below are the for the ones that you have given the getfattr output of. So > what is likely happening is there is an intermittent connection problem >

Re: [ovirt-users] [Gluster-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-25 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-25 11:31 GMT+02:00 Sahina Bose : > >> Other errors on unsync gluster elements still remain... This is a >> production env, so, there is any chance to subscribe to RH support? >> > > The unsynced entries - did you check for disconnect messages in the mount > log as

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-25 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-25 7:42 GMT+02:00 Kasturi Narra : > These errors are because not having glusternw assigned to the correct > interface. Once you attach that these errors should go away. This has > nothing to do with the problem you are seeing. > Hi, You talking about errors like

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-24 Thread yayo (j)
> > Thanks > kasturi > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> On 07/21/2017 11:41 PM, yayo (j) wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for follow up again, but, checking the ovirt interfa

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-24 Thread yayo (j)
> > All these ip are pingable and hosts resolvible across all 3 nodes but, >> only the 10.10.10.0 network is the decidated network for gluster (rosolved >> using gdnode* host names) ... You think that remove other entries can fix >> the problem? So, sorry, but, how can I remove other entries? >>

[ovirt-users] add fourth full gluster node and remove arbiter: ovirt 4.1 with hosted engine

2017-06-30 Thread yayo (j)
Hi at all, we have a 3 node cluster with this configuration: ovirtzz 4.1 with 3 node hyperconverged with gluster. 2 node are "full replicated" and 1 node is the arbiter. Now we have a new server to add to cluster then we want to add this new server and remove the arbiter (or, make this new

Re: [ovirt-users] add fourth full gluster node and remove arbiter: ovirt 4.1 with hosted engine

2017-06-30 Thread yayo (j)
2017-06-30 11:01 GMT+02:00 knarra : > You do not need to remove the arbiter node as you are getting the > advantage of saving on space by having this config. > > Since you have a new you can add this as fourth node and create another > gluster volume (replica 3) out of this

Re: [ovirt-users] add fourth full gluster node and remove arbiter: ovirt 4.1 with hosted engine

2017-06-30 Thread yayo (j)
2017-06-30 12:54 GMT+02:00 yayo (j) <jag...@gmail.com>: > The actual arbiter must be removed because is too obsolete. So, I needs to > add the new "full replicated" node but I want to know what are the steps > for add a new "full replicated" node and remove the

Re: [ovirt-users] add fourth full gluster node and remove arbiter: ovirt 4.1 with hosted engine

2017-07-03 Thread yayo (j)
Hi, And sorry for delay 2017-06-30 14:09 GMT+02:00 knarra : > To add a fully replicated node you need to reduce the replica count to 2 > and add new brick to the volume so that it becomes replica 3. Reducing > replica count by removing a brick from replica / arbiter cannot

Re: [ovirt-users] add fourth full gluster node and remove arbiter: ovirt 4.1 with hosted engine

2017-07-03 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-03 15:42 GMT+02:00 knarra : > So, please poweroff your vms while performing this. Thank you, Ok, no problem, cluster is not (yet) in production Thank you again! ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org

[ovirt-users] Configure an ovirt 4.1 hosted engine using SAS storage (aka DAS storage)

2017-07-06 Thread yayo (j)
Hi all, I'm tring to install a new cluster ovirt 4.1 (Centos 7) configured to use a SAN that expose LUN via SAS . When I start to deploy ovirt and the engine using "hosted-engine --deploy" the only options I have are: (glusterfs, iscsi, fc, nfs3, nfs4) There is no option for "local" storage

Re: [ovirt-users] Configure an ovirt 4.1 hosted engine using SAS storage (aka DAS storage)

2017-07-06 Thread yayo (j)
sed, paths: 2 active Can I go forward or is this totally not supported? Thank you 2017-07-06 11:43 GMT+02:00 yayo (j) <jag...@gmail.com>: > > Hi all, > > I'm tring to install a new cluster ovirt 4.1 (Centos 7) configured to use > a SAN that expose LUN via SAS . When I sta

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 : Can't install guest tools for Zentyal 5.0 (based on ubuntu 16.04 xenial)

2017-08-07 Thread yayo (j)
> > Agreed. >> >> Open a bug with Zentyal. They broke the packages from Ubuntu and should >> fix it themselves. They have to backport newer version of python-apt. >> The one from yakkety (1.1.0~beta5) should be good enough to fix the >> problem. >> >> In the bug report note that the

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 : Can't install guest tools for Zentyal 5.0 (based on ubuntu 16.04 xenial)

2017-08-07 Thread yayo (j)
> > This is the problem! > > I looked at the packages for conflict and figured the issue is in gnpug. > Zentyal repository contains gnupg version 2.1.15-1ubuntu6 which breaks > python-apt <= 1.1.0~beta4. > > Ok, thank you! Any workaround (something like packege pinning?) to fix this problem? > >

[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 : Can't install guest tools for Zentyal 5.0 (based on ubuntu 16.04 xenial)

2017-08-04 Thread yayo (j)
Hi all, I have this problem: I'm tring to install the guest tools following this guide: https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/how-to/guest-agent/install-the-guest-agent-in-ubuntu/#for-ubuntu-1604 This is the sources: deb http://it.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted deb

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 : Can't install guest tools for Zentyal 5.0 (based on ubuntu 16.04 xenial)

2017-08-07 Thread yayo (j)
t; python-apt per-se or with ovirt-guest-agent using python-apt? > > In the past with Zentyal 5 Dev Edition I had the same error: Added suggested repository that want install "python-apt" and remove "apt-get" (because conflicts) > > > > > > > On F

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 : Can't install guest tools for Zentyal 5.0 (based on ubuntu 16.04 xenial)

2017-08-07 Thread yayo (j)
> > > > Better workaround is to download newer python-apt from here [1] and > install it manually with dpkg. The guest agent seems to work OK with it. > There's much less chance of breaking something else, also newer > python-apt will be picked-up automatically on upgrades. > > Tomas > > > [1]

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1: migrate vm to node 2 results in lost connectivity

2017-05-15 Thread yayo (j)
2017-05-11 17:08 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola : > Can you be a bit more specific? Is it a Hosted Engine deployment? > Hyperconverged? Using oVirt Node for nodes? > Hi and sorry for delay, It's an hosted engine deployment Hyperconverged with gluster 2 node + 1 arbiter ... We

[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1: migrate vm to node 2 results in lost connectivity

2017-05-11 Thread yayo (j)
Hi all, I have a simple 3 node ovirt 4.1 gluster. All works fine but when I create or move a vm to node 2 the connection is lost, if I move the vm back to node 1 all works fine again. Looking to ovirt engine, network seems identical (for now I have only ovirtmng network). If I ping something from

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1: migrate vm to node 2 results in lost connectivity

2017-05-17 Thread yayo (j)
Hi, Did you have any news about this topic? I did some other tests but without success... When a vm migrate to second node, internet connection is lost Thank you 2017-05-15 9:36 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com>: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:33 AM, yayo (j) &l

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-09-08 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-19 11:22 GMT+02:00 yayo (j) <jag...@gmail.com>: > running the "gluster volume heal engine" don't solve the problem... > > Some extra info: > > We have recently changed the gluster from: 2 (full repliacated) + 1 > arbiter to 3 full replicated cluster bu