For future unlocking you may also use packaging/dbscrips/unlock_entity.sh,
which should be cleaner.
- Original Message -
From: Vered Volansky ve...@redhat.com
To: Vered Volansky ve...@redhat.com
Cc: Rob Abshear rabsh...@citytwist.net, users@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013
I add a qemu-cmd hook to localhost.
-device usb-host:vendorid=0718,productid=0083
And in the qemu/usb-test.log I find
Domain id=6 is tainted: custom-argv
husb: open device 2.7
/dev/bus/usb/002/007: Operation not permitted
husb: open device 2.7
/dev/bus/usb/002/007: Operation not permitted
On 10/31/2013 09:22 AM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:
on 2013/10/31 06:24, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Alessandro Bianchi wrote:
Il 30/10/2013 18:04, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:40:02PM +0100, Alessandro Bianchi wrote:
Il
Hi Peter,
I recently wrote a blog post about it:
http://javadump.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/howto-nested-kvm-based-virtual-setup-with-ovirt/
You can also use the all in one plugin, as Itamar suggested but still you would
need nested KVM enabled if you run this in a VM.
Regards,
Mike
On 10/31/2013 11:51 AM, Sahina Bose wrote:
On 10/31/2013 09:22 AM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:
on 2013/10/31 06:24, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:41:43PM +0100, Alessandro Bianchi wrote:
Il 30/10/2013 18:04, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:40:02PM
Il 31/10/2013 07:21, Sahina Bose ha
scritto:
On 10/31/2013 09:22 AM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:
on 2013/10/31 06:24, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On
Il 31/10/2013 08:02, Sahina Bose ha
scritto:
On 10/31/2013 11:51 AM, Sahina Bose wrote:
On 10/31/2013 09:22 AM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:
Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com kirjoitti 30.10.2013 kello 19.08:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 09:38:41AM +0300, Samuli Heinonen wrote:
Dear all,
i'm testing QEMU-Gluster features with oVirt 3.3.1 beta and RHEL 6.5 beta.
For reason or another it seems to bypass Gluster support in QEMU and
Ok now, it needs cgroup permission
On 2013年10月31日 14:16, lof yer wrote:
I add a qemu-cmd hook to localhost.
-device usb-host:vendorid=0718,productid=0083
And in the qemu/usb-test.log I find
Domain id=6 is tainted: custom-argv
husb: open device 2.7
/dev/bus/usb/002/007: Operation not
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:46:57PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
To try and improve 3.4 planning over the wiki approach in 3.3, I've
placed the items i collected on users list last time into a google
doc[1]
now, the main thing each item needs is a requirements owner, devel
owner and a testing
On 10/31/2013 11:36 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:46:57PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
To try and improve 3.4 planning over the wiki approach in 3.3, I've
placed the items i collected on users list last time into a google
doc[1]
now, the main thing each item needs is a
Hello Itamar,
Thank you for responding. The only machine i have is my Windows 7 pc (Intel i7,
16Gb ram). I'm running the manager in Virtualbox and want to run the hypervisor
in Virtualbox or VMware Workstation, just for study purposes. I'm using RHEL6
for the manager and wanted to use it for
Hello All,
i have gotten some good replies and suggestions on my question en i'll be on
them next weekend. Thanks to all and íll post my results later.
Have a good weekend all!
Peter
Origineel Bericht
Van : mkole...@redhat.com
Datum : 31/10/2013 07:43
Aan : ru...@planet.nl
Cc
Am Donnerstag, den 31.10.2013, 10:40 + schrieb Dan Kenigsberg:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 10/31/2013 11:36 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:46:57PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
To try and improve 3.4 planning over the wiki approach
Hallo Peter,
Hello Itamar,
Thank you for responding. The only machine i have is my Windows 7 pc (Intel i7,
16Gb ram). I'm running the manager in Virtualbox and want to run the hypervisor
in Virtualbox or VMware Workstation, just for study purposes. I'm using RHEL6
for the manager and wanted
Hi,
I execute ovirt-setup like this:
engine-setup --generate-answer=engine-setup-answerfile.txt
It installs ok, but no answer file gets generated.
In the logs I can see a file should be generated but it's nowhere to be found:
./ovirt-engine-setup-20131025111641.log:2013-10-25 11:16:41 DEBUG
- Original Message -
From: Jorick Astrego j.astr...@netbulae.eu
To: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:31:44 PM
Subject: [Users] engine-setup 3.3 doesn't generate answer file
Hi,
I execute ovirt-setup like this:
engine-setup
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:42:49AM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.10.2013, 10:40 + schrieb Dan Kenigsberg:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 10/31/2013 11:36 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:46:57PM +0200, Itamar
On 10/31/2013 12:40 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:10:20PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 10/31/2013 11:36 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:46:57PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
To try and improve 3.4 planning over the wiki approach in 3.3, I've
placed the
Hi,
I would like to propose to the community to join creating a group for testing
oVirt
releases and oVirt bug fixes. I suggest to create a ovirt-qe mailing list and
set
that as default QE assignee for oVirt bugs.
The list may be used for coordinating testing efforts, to be notified about new
+1!
I really think we need more testing and less bugs!
I hope I can assist in QA and testing new releases in the future.
Am 31.10.2013 13:54, schrieb Sandro Bonazzola:
Hi,
I would like to propose to the community to join creating a group for testing
oVirt
releases and oVirt bug fixes. I
- Original Message -
From: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
To: Jorick Astrego j.astr...@netbulae.eu
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:44:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] engine-setup 3.3 doesn't generate answer file
- Original Message -
From: Jorick
+1,
defiently a positive initiative going forward with stabilizing oVirt
with future versions.
Eyal.
- Original Message -
From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
To: users users@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:54:51 PM
Subject: [Users] oVirt quality team proposal
+1. That would be really usefull
Vincent
Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose to the community to join creating a group for testing
oVirt
releases and oVirt bug fixes. I suggest to create a ovirt-qe mailing list and
set
that as default QE assignee for
Hi,
Just to be clear: if you requested a feature last month, this is a great
chance to help make it happen. To do so:
* Ask for write access to the document below and add yourself as the
requirements owner
* Create a Feature page for the feature in the wiki, describing the
user-facing experience
Hi Sandro,
On 10/31/2013 01:54 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
I would like to propose to the community to join creating a group for testing
oVirt
releases and oVirt bug fixes. I suggest to create a ovirt-qe mailing list and
set
that as default QE assignee for oVirt bugs.
The list may be used
Il 31/10/2013 16:56, Dave Neary ha scritto:
Hi Sandro,
On 10/31/2013 01:54 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
I would like to propose to the community to join creating a group for
testing oVirt
releases and oVirt bug fixes. I suggest to create a ovirt-qe mailing list
and set
that as default QE
Hi,
I have a DC with an ISCSI data storage and several VMs running with
direct luns discs for each one. Ovirt is 3.2 all running on top of
centos 6.4 minimal(hosts and engine). I want to take snapshots of
the vms for backup but though it claims everything went
Hi,
I've an ovirt 3.2 install and I use iscsi targets for the disks. The
thing is that if I use ovirt to access the iscsi targets, it fails
because it doesn't get the right config deployed to the hosts. Thus I
had to do this manually and add the private header to the
multipath.conf file so ovirt
Hi Juan,
When you a snapshot- the snapshot is being taken for image disks -
lun/shareable disks aren't part of the snapshot.
- Original Message -
From: Juan Pablo Lorier jplor...@gmail.com
To: users users@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:24:27 PM
Subject: [Users] Problems
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
Hi,
I have a DC with an ISCSI data storage and several VMs running with direct
luns discs for each one. Ovirt is 3.2 all running on top of centos 6.4
minimal(hosts and engine). I want to take snapshots of the vms for backup
but
Hi Liron,
Thanks for the reply. If I get what you said, when I take a snapshot of a
vm, disk don't get copied, am I right? The system disk of the vm is not
shared, is dedicated to that vm and in the engine is not declared as
shared. How can I backup a live vm if it's not by a snapshot,?
El oct
I think that Gianluca is correct in his answer.
its a webadmin issue
On 10/31/2013 05:06 PM, jplor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Liron,
Thanks for the reply. If I get what you said, when I take a snapshot
of a vm, disk don't get copied, am I right? The system disk of the vm
is not shared, is
Thank you, I'll take a look at that.
Regards,
On 31/10/13 15:03, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
Hi,
I have a DC with an ISCSI data storage and several VMs running
with direct luns discs for each one. Ovirt is 3.2 all running on
Thanks, I'll take a look at the bug and see what I can do.
Regards,
On 31/10/13 15:11, Dafna Ron wrote:
I think that Gianluca is correct in his answer.
its a webadmin issue
On 10/31/2013 05:06 PM, jplor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Liron,
Thanks for the reply. If I get what you said, when I
Gianluca,
I saw your post and I think it does not apply to my problem. First of
all, I have newer version than yours:
ovirt-engine.noarch 3.2.2-1.1.el6
@ovirt-stable
ovirt-engine-backend.noarch 3.2.2-1.1.el6
@ovirt-stable
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 02:29:53PM -0200, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
Hi,
I've an ovirt 3.2 install and I use iscsi targets for the disks. The
thing is that if I use ovirt to access the iscsi targets, it fails
because it doesn't get the right config deployed to the hosts. Thus I
had to do this
On 10/31/2013 08:11 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
Gianluca,
I saw your post and I think it does not apply to my problem. First of
all, I have newer version than yours:
ovirt-engine.noarch 3.2.2-1.1.el6 @ovirt-stable
ovirt-engine-backend.noarch 3.2.2-1.1.el6
On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote:
hi,
i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h
nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be wishable
to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of hostsystems
which will be used as lab / testing
Hello,
Please cc me on any reply, because I tried to subscribe to this list
twice and did not receive any confirmation so I assume I'm not
subscribed.
I'm using ovirt live as a test framework for some Android SPICE client
work I'm doing and I have a couple of questions:
- My oVirt live distro
On 10/30/2013 11:20 PM, i iordanov wrote:
Hello,
Please cc me on any reply, because I tried to subscribe to this list
twice and did not receive any confirmation so I assume I'm not
subscribed.
please check your spam folder and flag as not spam...
I'm using ovirt live as a test framework
Hi Itamar,
yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and
ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect to
break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the
lab/staging are nonsense in that case, just not needed. and a 2nd
management
Hi Dave :)
It is easy to move things to and from Zanata - we like to work with
communities, not lock them in. You can download the source and translated
files, and takes these straight to any other translation tool.
Both Transifex and Zanata have strengths and weaknesses. If there are any
Hi Marcelo,
Always great to test the waters everywhere :)
Though I don't really know Transifex that well, if there is something I can do
to help with the project in Zanata or getting the files ou,t for you to move
around, I'm more than happy to assist.
Thanks,
Isaac
- Original
On 11/01/2013 02:36 AM, squadra wrote:
Hi Itamar,
yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and
ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect
to break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the
lab/staging are nonsense in that
45 matches
Mail list logo
