What Martin said is correct, let me just add that originally this
limitation was put in place because in older kernels the bridge for the
untagged network could see tagged traffic over the same physical
interface, which was a security loophole (as a VM using the untagged
bridge could sniff all the
Hi
Can you take a look at your storage and try to find the disk there.
It seems that they got lost and the engine cant find them.
If you can find them its possible to tie them back (the data seats on the disks)
Just search for those big qcow2 files or ovf ones.
Tolik Litovsky
+972542277403
Hi David,
On 13/02/15 01:28, David Smith wrote:
> Is there a way to directly connect a specific device (ie, NIC) to a
> particular VM?
>
> I've figured out how to map a specific network interface to a VM, thats
> one step, but in the end I may need direct access to the PCI device itself.
I think
Hi Tolik! My storage is a FC array. This array have 12 disks with 1 volume identified by LUN ID. I think this volume on the RAW format. Can i mount this like NFS? 16.02.2015, 11:04, "Tolik Litovsky" :Hi Can you take a look at your storage and try to find the disk there.It seems that they got lost a
Thank you for the explanation.
Le 16/02/2015 09:06, Lior Vernia a écrit :
What Martin said is correct, let me just add that originally this
limitation was put in place because in older kernels the bridge for the
untagged network could see tagged traffic over the same physical
interface, which wa
- Original Message -
> From: "Soeren Malchow"
> To: "Adam Litke" , "Nir Soffer"
> Cc: "Thomas Keppler (PEBA)" , users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:30:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Backup solution using the API
>
> Dear all,
>
> i am a little lost, i tried quit
Well I would like to not call it "ovirt-agent" because there already
is the "ovirt-guest_agent", so they could get confused by new users.
I really don't know if a new name is necessary at all.
What do you think are advantages?
Disadvantages are:
1. waste of time for searching a new name (already h
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
>
>
> I really don't know if a new name is necessary at all.
+1
I didn't know at all the origin of the acronym, but I already knew what it
does... so no value added in my opinion
___
Users mailing l
Hi,
I've set up 4 oVirt nodes with Gluster storage to provide high available
virtual machines.
The Gluster volumes are Distributed-Replicate with a replica count of 2.
The extra volume options are configured:
cat /var/lib/glusterd/groups/virt
quick-read=off
read-ahead=off
io-cache=off
stat-pref
- Original Message -
> From: "Lior Vernia"
> To: "David Smith"
> Cc: "users" , "Martin Polednik"
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 9:15:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Directly connect NIC or other cards to VM?
>
> Hi David,
>
> On 13/02/15 01:28, David Smith wrote:
> > Is there a
On 02/10/2015 04:13 PM, Artyom Lukianov wrote:
I checked a little in code, and we have some complicate formula for memory:
memory_that_vm_need = host.mem_commited + host.pending_vmem_size +
host.guest_overhead + host.reserved_mem + vm.guaranteed_memory
you can check all parameters for host unde
No, not really yet as I can't easily test this
as this is a production vm which I can't reboot atm.
I'll try to get a copy of this system in the dev environment
and try to reproduce.
Thanks for the help, so far.
On 16/02/15 13:29, Roy Golan wrote:
> Sven is that solved?
--
Mit freundlichen Grü
Dear Liron,
thanks alot, i know, i was following that, however the Live Merge Feature was
missing in CentOS 7, that was already the discussion.
Now on Fedora 20 the Live Merge works (we have to stick to Fedora then until
this is in CentOS 7.1 ?! )
I am experimenting with scripts to iterate thr
Hi
You mean you used the disks from FC directly in the VM's and not as NFS share
and stored the disk on that NFS share ?
Tolik Litovsky
+972542277403
- Original Message -
> From: "Николаев Алексей"
> To: "Tolik Litovsky"
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, 16 February, 2015 10:20:3
Yes exactly. I've create a Vdisk by HP manage utility. And create a new DATA_DOMAIN with type DATA / Fibre Channel. 16.02.2015, 15:48, "Tolik Litovsky" :HiYou mean you used the disks from FC directly in the VM's and not as NFS share and stored the disk on that NFS share ? Tolik Litovsky+9725422774
Hi
I am not very familiar with FC arrays.
But can you try to fsck them somehow ?
The logs show that it cant connect to those disks.
One reason can be that they was not unmounted correctly from the VMs.
After that you can try to import them again into the engine.
Tolik Litovsky
+972542277403
-
Hi,
As we continue developing oVirt 3.6 and future releases of oVirt, the
development and integration team are seeking input from users on how oVirt is
being run and on what platforms. We would appreciate you help by taking this
quick survey!
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1u-YccuNRza4_WmS5VMdy
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Greg Swift"
> > To: users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 7:37:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] self hosted setup with answer file
> >
> > I'm starting to get more concerned. It
Will the submitted information be published somewhere (public)?
If yes, under which license?
I could imagine that some people would not like to share
some information when it get's public.
On 16/02/15 16:37, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Hi,
> As we continue developing oVirt 3.6 and future releases o
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 04:26:35AM -0500, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nathanaël Blanchet"
> > To: users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:44:51 PM
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] firewalld and NetworkManager support
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've ju
You would need six storage hosts in total to maintain quorum if even one
of the hosts goes down. There's no way to decide who's right with
replica 2. When you have 2 out of 3 online, majority rules.
I have a four node cluster doing replica 4, no distribute. I can take
one host down. If two are
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 01:11:20PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Genadi Chereshnya said:
> > If I understand you correctly you are trying to replace the physical device
> > mirroring with VM?
>
> Yes, that is correct.
>
> > If this is the case I don't think it's possible to do i
Hi,
I am running Ovirt 3.5.1 and have the following settings in the engine
config for VM memory :-
-
[root@ccr01 ~]# engine-config -g VM32BitMaxMemorySizeInMB
VM32BitMaxMemorySizeInMB: 65536 version: general
[root@ccr01 ~]# engine-config -g VM64BitMaxMemorySizeInMB
VM64BitMaxMemo
I am a newbie and trying to learn Ovirt.
I have installed the hypervisor using Ovirt-3.1 node cd.
I noticed my Storage tab states ...
Remote Storage:
iSCSI Initiator Name:
iqn. 1994-05.com.redhat: 1dcc111a82a8
1. I would like to understand whether I had any way of using other
Sto
Hi Punit,
one thing is confusing me. You refer to VM32BitMaxMemorySizeInMB, but you are
working with 64bit VM/template. Shouldn’t it be VM64BitMaxMemorySizeInMB?
Anyways both should allow for approx. 64GB of memory. If you create VM with
63GB (or closest lower amount) it works?
Could you prov
25 matches
Mail list logo
