Hi,
I want to try Java SDK to see its usability.
Can someone help me how to checkout code and compile Java SDK ?
or Install Java SDK ?
I am using Eclipse-Java for IDE.
Thanks,
~Rohit
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailma
Done as requested; filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408134
Thank you for your help!
Andrea
From: Fred Rolland [mailto:froll...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:01 AM
To: Andrea Ghelardi
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] BUG: "interface" field empty in "attac
On 22 December 2016 at 11:21, TranceWorldLogic . wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to try Java SDK to see its usability.
>
> Can someone help me how to checkout code and compile Java SDK ?
> or Install Java SDK ?
>
> I am using Eclipse-Java for IDE.
>
Start with the readme
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-
Hi,
I am getting below error logs
---
[INFO] ERROR org.ovirt.api.metamodel.tool.Main - Error while executing the
"run" method of tool class "org.ovirt.sdk.java.Tool".
[INFO] java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
[INFO] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Me
Hi,
Have a VRTX Chassis enclosure populated with two Dell PowerEdge M620 Blades
and has a built-in DAS storage. Created a 1 TB Virtual Disk from the DAS
storage using the Dell iDRAC interface. This block device is accessible
from the two blades (CentOS 7 OS) like shown below,
[root@node1 ~]# lsb
Hello rex.
I have a very similar situation and I'm interested to find out how
people are doing to use DAS in these types of environments.
Thanks
Fernando
On 22/12/2016 10:07, rex wrote:
Hi,
Have a VRTX Chassis enclosure populated with two Dell PowerEdge M620
Blades and has a built-in DAS s
> On 15 Dec 2016, at 16:46, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
>
> Il 15/Dic/2016 16:17, "InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter"
> ha scritto:
> Am 15.12.2016 um 15:51 schrieb Sandro Bonazzola:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:02 PM, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
> > mailto:j...@internetx.com>>
> On 22 Dec 2016, at 15:01, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
>
>
>> On 15 Dec 2016, at 16:46, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Il 15/Dic/2016 16:17, "InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter"
>> ha scritto:
>> Am 15.12.2016 um 15:51 schrieb Sandro Bonazzola:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:02 P
On 22/12/2016 15:29, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
>> it is important for 3.6 and 4.0, but in 4.1 we should not be using any
>> rhel-6 machine type anymore
>> There is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402435 for HE which
>> should be fixed (if real)
>
> though, the bug opened by Paolo ta
In theory, if you can see the DAS LUN with multipath, you can build the
storage domain as if it's FC. Might need to play with multipath settings to
make sure it's not filtered out.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Fernando Frediani <
fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br> wrote:
> Hello rex.
>
> I have a
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nathanaël Blanchet
wrote:
> Hi,
> sebool unconfigured module prevents vdsm from starting:
>
We always run with selinux. What's the reason for disabling it?
Y.
[root@gaua2 network-scripts]# vdsm-tool configure --force
>
> Checking configuration status...
>
> Cu
Windows activation, at least for 2008 and below, depend on enough hardware
changes to happen. Each HW (of non-pluggable devices) change is a single
'penalty' point - except for NIC (based on MAC address) which is more. 4 or
so points - and it requires re-activation. This does not apply to KMS
licen
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
> Hi,
> as you probably noticed, CentOS 7.3 is rolling out right now and will be
> announced pretty soon.
> Please note that due to new libvirt shipped within CentOS 7.3, it is
> required to update qemu-kvm-ev to 2.6 at the same time.
>
> I
The requirement is to use ovirt hypervisor for one application along with vdsm.
I want to only "x" amount of memory should be visible/allocated to hypervisor
for hosting the VMs rest I will use for my application hosted on same physical
box.
pointers will be appreciated
Thanks
Shishir-
_
Le 22/12/2016 à 17:26, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
Windows activation, at least for 2008 and below, depend on enough
hardware changes to happen. Each HW (of non-pluggable devices) change
is a single 'penalty' point - except for NIC (based on MAC address)
which is more. 4 or so points - and it requires
> On 22 Dec 2016, at 22:02, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
>
> Le 22/12/2016 à 17:26, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
>> Windows activation, at least for 2008 and below, depend on enough hardware
>> changes to happen. Each HW (of non-pluggable devices) change is a single
>> 'penalty' point - except for NIC (base
Le 22/12/2016 à 22:06, Michal Skrivanek a écrit :
I read more about this WPA issue, and I also checked : all our
licences are MAK_B kind, which I read everywhere that they should
not induce such WPA trouble, once they are correctly registered
(which I obviously take care of). I also read the list
17 matches
Mail list logo
