> On Dec 30, 2016, at 11:03 AM, TranceWorldLogic .
> wrote:
>
> HI,
Hi there,
>
> I was exploring more about ovirt-gueste-engin.
> It look to me very easy to configure add add hook as script.
>
> But my doubt is, how to invoke those script from ovirt-engine ?
>
1. That is not possible as ovirt (or vdsm) will rewrite the network
configuration to a non-working state. That is why I've set that if as
hidden to vdsm and is why I'm keen on getting OVS/OVN to work
2. I've been reading the doc for OVN and starting to connect the dots,
which is not trivial
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Jim Kusznir wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I've been involved in virtualization from its very early days, and been
> running linux virtualization solutions off and on for a decade.
> Previously, I was always frustrated with the long feature list
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Richard Chan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The repo files for ovirt-4.0 seem to have overlapping packages from (el7
> vs centos.el7 naming).
>
> resources.ovirt.org: ovirt-4.0
>
> and
>
> mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.0/:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:29:17 -0500 Derek wrote:
DA> Is this the official response from the ovirt team, to use the
DA> centos-release-qemu-ev repo? Or will qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.6.0 get
DA> released in the ovirt-release40 repo sometime soon? (I'm glad I haven't
DA> updated yet!)
I read it here:
On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:27:21 +0100 Michal wrote:
MS> > Or will qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.6.0 get
MS> > released in the ovirt-release40 repo sometime soon? (I'm glad I haven't
MS> > updated yet!)
MS>
MS> It wouldn't let you upgrade the host due to the dependency so
MS> hopefully nothing would break,
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Jim Kusznir wrote:
> I pinged both the router on the subnet and a host IP in-between the two
> ip's.
>
> [root@ovirt3 ~]# ping -I 162.248.147.33 162.248.147.1
> PING 162.248.147.1 (162.248.147.1) from 162.248.147.33 : 56(84) bytes of
> data.
I currently only have two IPs assigned to me...I can try and take another,
but that may not route out of the rack. I've got the VM on one of the IPs
and the host on the other currently.
The switch is a "web-managed" basic 8-port switch (thrown in for testing
while the "real" switch is in
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Jim Kusznir wrote:
> I currently only have two IPs assigned to me...I can try and take another,
> but that may not route out of the rack. I've got the VM on one of the IPs
> and the host on the other currently.
>
> The switch is a
Hi Gary,
this is a known issue we're working on. if the VM is down it should
work as expected (edit the VM and close the dialog).
Please try and let me know. Another option is to do this until the bug
is resolved is using the REST API.
Note that this is currently working on on Linux guests (there
> On 01 Jan 2017, at 15:18, Doron Fediuck wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
> this is a known issue we're working on. if the VM is down it should
> work as expected (edit the VM and close the dialog).
Engine.log might help. Can you attach it? Supposing you mean the VM is
created and not
> On 31 Dec 2016, at 03:29, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Is this the official response from the ovirt team, to use the
> centos-release-qemu-ev repo?
It's the best choice for now. I suppose we will just add it to the
repo list instead of re-releasing the package. It's
I pinged both the router on the subnet and a host IP in-between the two
ip's.
[root@ovirt3 ~]# ping -I 162.248.147.33 162.248.147.1
PING 162.248.147.1 (162.248.147.1) from 162.248.147.33 : 56(84) bytes of
data.
64 bytes from 162.248.147.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=8.17 ms
64 bytes from
13 matches
Mail list logo