Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-21 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-20 14:48 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N : > > But it does say something. All these gfids of completed heals in the log > below are the for the ones that you have given the getfattr output of. So > what is likely happening is there is an intermittent connection problem >

Re: [ovirt-users] oVIRT 4.1 / iSCSI Multipathing

2017-07-21 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: > Hello, > > I’ve skipped this message entirely yesterday. So this is per design? > Because the best practices of iSCSI MPIO, as far as I know, recommends two > completely separate paths. If this can’t be achieved with

Re: [ovirt-users] workflow suggestion for the creating and destroying the VMs?

2017-07-21 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > thanks,the downscaling is important for me, > It really depends on the guest OS cooperation. While off-lining a CPU is relatively easy, hot-unplugging memory is a bigger challenge for the OS. i was testing something

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-21 Thread yayo (j)
Hi, Sorry for follow up again, but, checking the ovirt interface I've found that ovirt report the "engine" volume as an "arbiter" configuration and the "data" volume as full replicated volume. Check these screenshots:

Re: [ovirt-users] workflow suggestion for the creating and destroying the VMs?

2017-07-21 Thread Arman Khalatyan
Yes, thanks for mentioning puppet, we have foreman for the bare metal systems. I was looking something like preboot hook script, to mount the /dev/sda and copy some stuff there. Is it possible to do that with cloud-init/sysprep? On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Karli Sjöberg

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-21 Thread Ravishankar N
On 07/21/2017 02:55 PM, yayo (j) wrote: 2017-07-20 14:48 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N >: But it does say something. All these gfids of completed heals in the log below are the for the ones that you have given the getfattr output

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt on sdcard?

2017-07-21 Thread Mahdi Adnan
Hello, Same here, im running multiple servers on SD cards without issues. -- Respectfully Mahdi A. Mahdi From: users-boun...@ovirt.org on behalf of Arsène Gschwind Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:32:11

[ovirt-users] Problemas with ovirtmgmt network used to connect VMs

2017-07-21 Thread FERNANDO FREDIANI
Has anyone had problem when using the ovirtmgmt bridge to connect VMs ? I am still facing a bizarre problem where some VMs connected to this bridge stop passing traffic. Checking the problem further I see its mac address stops being learned by the bridge and the problem is resolved only with

Re: [ovirt-users] workflow suggestion for the creating and destroying the VMs?

2017-07-21 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Yes, thanks for mentioning puppet, we have foreman for the bare metal > systems. > I was looking something like preboot hook script, to mount the /dev/sda > and copy some stuff there. > Is it possible to do that with

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements

2017-07-21 Thread yayo (j)
2017-07-20 14:48 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N : > > But it does say something. All these gfids of completed heals in the log > below are the for the ones that you have given the getfattr output of. So > what is likely happening is there is an intermittent connection problem >

Re: [ovirt-users] workflow suggestion for the creating and destroying the VMs?

2017-07-21 Thread Arman Khalatyan
thanks,the downscaling is important for me, i was testing something like: 1) clone from actual vm(super slow,even if it is 20GB OS, needs more investigation,nfs is bottle neck) 2) start it with dhcp, 3) somehow find the ip 4) sync parameters between running vm and new vm. looks that everything