Thanks for the tip Nico - I hadn't spotted that.
We use EPEL for a number of packages across our hosts, I'm guessing a proper
workaround for us might be to only enable it for individual packages.
Thanks again!
--
Sam McLeod
Please respond via email when possible.
https://smcleod.net
Release notes make me excited - alas, I must have missed this!
Might be worth adding to the installation pre-reqs, I'll consider doing a MR.
Thanks again,
--
Sam McLeod
Please respond via email when possible.
https://smcleod.net
https://twitter.com/s_mcleod
> On 30 Apr 2018, at 4:57 pm, Nico
Do not install the EPEL repository. See also the remark in the release
notes about this
https://ovirt.org/release/4.2.0/#epel
Do a clean install of CentOS, install oVirt. Afterwards get anything extra
from epel if required.
Nico
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Sam McLeod
Yep, that's what I did after hitting my head on the same thing. It's so
boring to read release notes upfront ;-)
Nico
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Sam McLeod
wrote:
> Thanks for the tip Nico - I hadn't spotted that.
>
> We use EPEL for a number of packages across
Hi,
You will need to enable nested virtualization in your physical host.
To check if enable:
cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested
If the output is "N", you will need to add a file
/etc/modprobe.d/kvm_intel.conf
with the content:
options kvm-intel nested=Y
Then reboot, or reload the KVM
Thanks!
Maybe the cinder/ceph setup is not so "very" customized, but we are
using a current librbd1 (12.2.x) instead of the version in CentOS 7. For
this we had to switch from upstream Ceph RPMs (depending on
lttng-ust/userspace-rcu from epel repo) to self-compiled Ceph RPMs
(depending on
On Monday, April 30, 2018 10:35:13 AM EDT Lionel Caignec wrote:
> Ok thank you for this explanation it seems logical.
>
> Where can i modify this settings? Posgres configuration or in the database?
>
postgresql configuration, its a 100 by default. You can either increase that
number to
Ok thank you for this explanation it seems logical.
Where can i modify this settings? Posgres configuration or in the database?
- Mail original -
De: "Alexander Wels"
À: "users"
Cc: "Lionel Caignec"
Envoyé: Lundi 30 Avril 2018
Hi,
finally after one more try of reinstallation server is now "operrational"
really does not understande what happen :(.
Lionel.
- Mail original -
De: "Lionel Caignec"
À: "users"
Envoyé: Lundi 30 Avril 2018 15:14:36
Objet: [ovirt-users] Unable to
On Monday, April 30, 2018 9:49:16 AM EDT Lionel Caignec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> finally after one more try of reinstallation server is now "operrational"
> really does not understande what happen :(.
>
> Lionel.
>
According to that exception there was an issue connecting to the engine
database to
Hi,
Can you please share your engine log?
Thanks,
Piotr
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:51 PM, gss...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got this err log when I start my engine service.
>
> 2018-04-25 18:40:21,012+08 INFO
> [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.reactors.ReactorClient] (SSL
Hi,
Newer Vdsm will work with older engine, so in your case, I don't see any
reason not to update the Vdsm.
BTW, can you describe what do you mean by "a very customized cinder/ceph
setup" ?
Thanks,
Fred
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Matthias Leopold <
matthias.leop...@meduniwien.ac.at>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 7:31 AM, wrote:
> Hi
> I engine setup faces some error.
>
> I try to solute it and it is work. here is my patch. But not sure it is
> right?
>
It seems right, but isn't it already done in these?
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Eduardo Mayoral wrote:
> On 30/04/18 12:51, Tony Brian Albers wrote:
> > On 30/04/18 11:43, Eduardo Mayoral wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to set up a new oVirt deployment with hosts that have
> >> the VMs running on local attached
By "used storage size of a VM" do you mean the disks which are attached to
it?
If it does then you can check each attached disk of the VM and summerize
their sizes.
For getting the disks attachments of the VM you can use the following REST
URL:
Hi,
I would like to set up a new oVirt deployment with hosts that have
the VMs running on local attached storage. I understand this has the
requirement of having each host in its own cluster (and own datacenter,
it seems, I understand the need for the dedicated cluster, not so much
for the
On 30/04/18 11:43, Eduardo Mayoral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to set up a new oVirt deployment with hosts that have
> the VMs running on local attached storage. I understand this has the
> requirement of having each host in its own cluster (and own datacenter,
> it seems, I understand the
On 30/04/18 12:51, Tony Brian Albers wrote:
> On 30/04/18 11:43, Eduardo Mayoral wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to set up a new oVirt deployment with hosts that have
>> the VMs running on local attached storage. I understand this has the
>> requirement of having each host in its own cluster
Greetings.
In terms of teaching our students how to create and configure an oVirt
infrastructure, we're planning to provide each of them a VM that will act
as a Manager server, which has no issues so far. The problem is that we
don't have enough physical machines to use as virtualization servers
First, sorry that my previous answer went directly to you and not to the
list. My mistake.
Well, detaching and attaching shared storage domains is not the solution
I was hoping for, but at least it gives me an option to migrate VMs
between hosts. It is either that or gluster (thanks, Tony),
Hi,
i've upgraded my ovirt installation from 4.1.x to 4.2..
But i have problem with one host. Ovirt said some mandatory network missing,
but when i look into network configuration all Physical Card are in RED marked
down.
But my network is fully operrationnal (can ping).
I tried to remove all
On Monday, April 30, 2018 9:02:35 AM EDT James Michels wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> In terms of teaching our students how to create and configure an oVirt
> infrastructure, we're planning to provide each of them a VM that will act
> as a Manager server, which has no issues so far. The problem is that
22 matches
Mail list logo