Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage?

2014-01-08 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "squadra [squa...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2014 17:15 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage? > > better go for iscsi or something else... i whould

Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage?

2014-01-09 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Karli Sjöberg [karli.sjob...@slu.se] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2014 08:48 > An: squa...@gmail.com > Cc: users@ovirt.org; Markus Stockhausen > Betreff: Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage? > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 08:35 +0100, squadr

Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage?

2014-01-09 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: squadra [squa...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2014 09:30 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Karli Sjöberg; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage? > > try it, i bet that you will get better latency results w

[Users] VirtIO disk latency

2014-01-09 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, coming from the "low cost NFS storage thread" I will open a new one about a topic that might be interesting for others too. We see a quite a heavy latency penalty using KVM VirtIO disks in comparison to ESX. Doing one I/O onto disk inside a VM usually adds 370us of overhead in the virtuali

Re: [Users] VirtIO disk latency

2014-01-09 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: sander.grendel...@gmail.com > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2014 10:32 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [Users] VirtIO disk latency > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Markus Stockhausen > wrote: > ... > > - access NFS in

Re: [Users] Replacing ISO domain

2014-01-09 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "Gabi > C [gab...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2014 11:48 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [Users] Replacing ISO domain > > Hello! > > 1 Ovirt-engine + 2 nodes with Glusterfs on them (replicate), 1 ISO domain

Re: [Users] VSDM´s logrotate makes Hosts fill up var eventually

2014-01-10 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Ah man, now I see it, it´s not rotating the right file, look: > # grep libvirtd /etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd > /var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log { > # grep libvirtd.log /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf > log_outputs="1:file:/var/log/libvirtd.log" > > Bug? I would say no - at least for Fedora 19 nodes. In ou

[Users] noVNC with intermediate certificates

2014-01-11 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, after configuring noVNC websocket proxy I would like to load an offically signed certificate into it. Otherwise I would always have to accept the self signed certificate on port 6100. See here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-October/017108.html >From the configuration file I

Re: [Users] noVNC with intermediate certificates

2014-01-12 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Alon Bar-Lev [alo...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. Januar 2014 19:56 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [Users] noVNC with intermediate certificates > > Hi, > > Can you please try to specify > > SSL_CERTIFICATE=xxx &g

Re: [Users] Horrid performance during disk I/O

2014-01-13 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Under ESXi I was pretty happy with the disk performance, and noticed very > little difference from bare metal to HV. > Under oVirt/QEMU/KVM, not so much…. Still unanswered ... have a look here ... http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-January/019429.html Markus *

Re: [Users] Help: Problem uploading the ISO file on engine

2014-01-13 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> I copied a Centos netinstall ISO file to a directory on my engine machine to > get ready for installation. Then I used > > engine-iso-uploader upload -i ISO_DOMAIN CentOS-6.4-x86_64-netinstall.iso > If you have access to the ISO domain you can simply copy files into it. Ensure to set the right

Re: [Users] What's the correct way to upload a VM ISO image?

2014-01-14 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "David Li [david...@sbcglobal.net] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Januar 2014 21:06 >An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [Users] What's the correct way to upload a VM ISO image? > ... > 3. If I don't use engine-iso-uploader command,

Re: [Users] What's the correct way to upload a VM ISO image?

2014-01-14 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: David Li [david...@sbcglobal.net] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Januar 2014 22:48 > An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: AW: [Users] What's the correct way to upload a VM ISO image? > > Markus, > > Before upload, where was your image located?

Re: [Users] VM start Options

2014-01-16 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Blaster [blas...@556nato.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Januar 2014 03:44 > An: Itamar Heim > Cc: users > Betreff: Re: [Users] VM start Options > > When I was researching virtio-blk and virtio-scsi and some of the > corre

Re: [Users] Making v2v easier?

2014-01-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Januar 2014 16:19 > An: users >> "users@ovirt.org" > Betreff: [Users] Making v2v easier? > > I see a lot of threads about v2v pains (mostly from ESX?) > > I'm intere

[Users] virt-v2v: too many IDE bus:

2014-01-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, we are currently encountering the above error during virt-v2v migration. There was an older post about it here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-December/018379.html The answers suggest that this is already fixed upstream and that you only need virt-v2v for OS disks. Could someo

[Users] virt-v2v: invalid backend appliance

2014-01-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, just tried to run virt-v2v on Fedora 20. Disk conversion works flawlessly but in the end the process fails with: libguestfs: create: flags = 0, handle = 0x4fe26a0, program = perl invalid backend: appliance at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Sys/VirtConvert/GuestfsHandle.pm line 83. libguestf

Re: [Users] virt-v2v: invalid backend appliance

2014-01-20 Thread Markus Stockhausen
>Von: Richard W.M. Jones [rjo...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 10:59 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: ovirt-users; mbo...@redhat.com > Betreff: Re: [Users] virt-v2v: invalid backend appliance > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 07:56:22PM +0000, Markus Stockha

Re: [Users] virt-v2v: too many IDE bus:

2014-01-20 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Matthew Booth [mbo...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 11:16 > An: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [Users] virt-v2v: too many IDE bus: > > On 19/01/14 14:07, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > we are currently enco

Re: [Users] Error when trying to create a new ISO storage domain

2014-01-20 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Hi all, > > I am trying to define a new ISO storage domain. I go to System > Storage, click on the "New Domain" link, and fill in the requisite > fields. "Domain Function / Storage Type" drop is set to "ISO / NFS", > and I verified that I have the proper NFS path to the export on the > NFS s

[Users] Change bootdisk from IDE to virtio

2014-01-21 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, i have a SLES 11 VM that was migrated into ovirt. I successfully changed all except the boot/root disk to virtio. Nevertheless I'm unable to do the same for the boot disk itself What I've done so far: - replace all /dev/sdx entries in fstab to /disk/by-uuid - replace all /dev/sdx entries

Re: [Users] Change bootdisk from IDE to virtio

2014-01-21 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> > After switching the disk over to virtio the boot process hangs at > > > > SeaBIOS... > > > > Machine UUID ... > > > > iPXE ... > > > > Booting from Hard Disk ... > > initramfs doesn't contain virtio drivers? Tried it without luck: linux-xj78:~ # blkid /dev/vda1: UUID="d03b0079-c2e1-4ca2-

Re: [Users] Change bootdisk from IDE to virtio

2014-01-21 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: sander.grendel...@gmail.com [sander.grendel...@gmail.com]" im > Auftrag von "Sander Grendelman [san...@grendelman.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014 16:25 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: noc; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [Users] Change bootdisk from

[Users] OVirt 3.3.2 Snapshot Pane empty in Firefox

2014-01-23 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, I had a mysterios behaviour in the webinterface twice this week. The Snapshot list of a VM remained empty in Firefox although I know that snapshots exist. The "Create Snapshot" button was still working and issued the right commands. Nevertheless the list remained empty. Opening an IE sess

Re: [Users] OVirt 3.3.2 Snapshot Pane empty in Firefox

2014-01-27 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 11:52 > An: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users; Daniel Erez > Cc: Allon Mureinik > Betreff: Re: [Users] OVirt 3.3.2 Snapshot Pane empty in Firefox > > On 01/23/2014 12:49 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: >

Re: [Users] OVirt 3.3.2 Snapshot Pane empty in Firefox

2014-01-27 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Could be indeed related to the session timeout, some issues > regarding have been addressed in 3.4. The default timeout > is 30 minutes defined by UserSessionTimeOutInterval in > vdc_options table. Can you consistently reproduce the issue > on timeout? Which version of Firefox are you using? Ope

Re: [Users] Xeon 5060 support "Dempsey"

2014-01-28 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "Peter > Galgano [pe...@cleftstoneworks.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Januar 2014 18:53 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [Users] Xeon 5060 support "Dempsey" > > Thanks in advance for any help you can provide > > We are test

Re: [Users] Migration failed (previous migrations succeded)

2014-01-30 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Markus Stockhausen [stockhau...@collogia.de] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2014 18:05 > An: ovirt-users > Betreff: [Users] Migration failed (previous migrations succeded) > > Hello, &

Re: [Users] Migration failed (previous migrations succeded)

2014-01-30 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> > Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com] > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2014 21:25 > > An: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users > > Betreff: Re: [Users] Migration failed (previous migrations succeded) > > > > > > Now I' getting serious problems. Dur

[Users] Share SPICE console between 2 admins

2014-01-31 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, we want to share the spice console of our VMs for 2 or more administrators. So that they can see the same desktop. I read several articles about SPICE_DEBUG_ALLOW_MC=1 and think that my be the way to go. The only problem seems to be that I must set it as an environment variable on the hyp

Re: [Users] Share SPICE console between 2 admins

2014-01-31 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Januar 2014 18:49 > An: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users; spice-devel > Betreff: Re: [Users] Share SPICE console between 2 admins > > On 01/31/2014 07:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > Hello, > >

[Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM

2014-02-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, all my searching/reading left me more confused. My current problem is a Windows VM that has a wrong "timezone" - at least if I do not activate internet time server sync. Settings are: - OVirt VM definition - First Run GMT+1 - thats ok - hypervisor host: timezone CET (= GMT+1) - 18:00 - th

Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM

2014-02-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
; ... # update vm_dynamic set utc_diff=3600 where vm_guid='...'; # commit; Afterwards start VM. Markus Von: Bob [b...@doolittle.us.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014 18:46 An: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users Betreff: Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/

Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM

2014-02-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Dan Kenigsberg [dan...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014 19:43 > An: Bob; Martin Polednik > Cc: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:46:38PM -0500, Bob wrote: > > I have the

Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM

2014-02-07 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Dan Kenigsberg [dan...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014 19:43 > An: Bob; Martin Polednik > Cc: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:46:38PM -0500, Bob wrote: > > I have the

Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM

2014-02-07 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> > A detailed BZ report is worth its weight in gold ;-) > > Dan. Opened BZ 1062615 for that. Markus Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat

Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM

2014-02-07 Thread Markus Stockhausen
/QEMU timing values another way than Windows. Markus Von: Bob Doolittle [b...@doolittle.us.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Februar 2014 16:18 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: from...@redhat.com; users; Martin Polednik; Dan Kenigsberg Betreff: Re: AW: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor

Re: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.4.0 beta2 is now available

2014-02-07 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Sandro Bonazzola [sbona...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Februar 2014 11:36 > An: annou...@ovirt.org; Users@ovirt.org; engine-devel; arch; VDSM Project > Development > Betreff: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.4.0 beta2 is now

Re: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM

2014-02-07 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Markus Stockhausen > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Februar 2014 14:46 > An: Dan Kenigsberg; from...@redhat.com > Cc: Bob; Martin Polednik; ovirt-users > Betreff: AW: [Users] Timezone Hypervisor/VM > > > > > A detailed BZ report is worth its weight in gold ;-) >

Re: [Users] snapshots not shown in webadmin on 3.3.3

2014-02-15 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Jiri Belka [jbe...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2014 09:27 > An: Eli Mesika > Cc: Juan Pablo Lorier; users > Betreff: Re: [Users] snapshots not shown in webadmin on 3.3.3 > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:41:0

[Users] Guest Agent for SLES 11 SP3

2014-02-17 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-November/018130.html suggests that there exists a guest agent for SLES 11 SP3. Could someone provide a download link? Thanks. Markus Diese E-Mail enthält vertraulich

Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning

2014-02-25 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Giorgio Bersano [giorgio.bers...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Februar 2014 15:13 > An: Itamar Heim > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning > > > Maybe this one is even more important: the

Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning

2014-02-25 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 24. Februar 2014 17:59 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning > > with oVirt 3.4 getting close to GA with many many great features, time > to collect

Re: [Users] concurrent SPICE access [was: Re: oVirt 3.5 planning]

2014-02-26 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Michal Skrivanek [mskri...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2014 08:49 > An: spice-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Markus Stockhausen; Itamar Heim; Users@ovirt.org Users > Betreff: concurrent SPICE access [was: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning] > > On F

Re: [Users] concurrent SPICE access [was: Re: oVirt 3.5 planning]

2014-02-27 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 09:53 > An: Sven Kieske; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [Users] concurrent SPICE access [was: Re: oVirt 3.5 planning] > > On 02/27/2014 10:52 AM, It

Re: [Users] Snapshots not listed for VM using 3.3.4

2014-03-07 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Trey Dockendorf > [treyd...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. März 2014 23:23 > An: users > Betreff: [Users] Snapshots not listed for VM using 3.3.4 > > I have two VMs in my cluster, one is CentOS 6.5 and one is CentOS

Re: [Users] Snapshots not visible in webadmin

2014-03-26 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, there are already fixes for future OVirt versions. See a detail story in BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058618 Markus Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "Gilad Chaplik [gchap...@redhat.com] Gese

[Users] Cannot login with AD user after upgrade 3.3->3.4

2014-03-28 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, my upgrade from 3.3 to 3.4 went quite well. Only problem afterwards is I'm unable to log into the engine with one of my attached AD users. Internal admin user works fine. system permissions before and after the upgrade are as follows: mydomain.com/builtin/Administrators SuperUser mydomain

Re: [Users] Cannot login with AD user after upgrade 3.3->3.4

2014-03-28 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Hello, > > my upgrade from 3.3 to 3.4 went quite well. Only problem > afterwards is I'm unable to log into the engine with one of > my attached AD users. Internal admin user works fine. > > system permissions before and after the upgrade are as follows: > > mydomain.com/builtin/Administrators S

Re: [Users] Cannot login with AD user after upgrade 3.3->3.4

2014-03-30 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Yair Zaslavsky [yzasl...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. März 2014 04:11 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [Users] Cannot login with AD user after upgrade 3.3->3.4 > > Markus, which version of ovirt 3.3 did you upgrade from? and to whi

[Users] TSC clocksource gets lost after live migration

2014-04-03 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, we have an up to date ovirt 3.4 installation. Inside we are running SLES11 SP3 VMs (Kernel 3.0.76-0.11). After live migration of these VMs they all of a sudden do not react any longer and CPU usage of the VM goes to 100%. We identified kvm-clock source to be the culprit and therefore switc

Re: [Users] TSC clocksource gets lost after live migration

2014-04-05 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Michal Skrivanek [michal.skriva...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 4. April 2014 15:33 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: ovirt-users > > Betreff: Re: [Users] TSC clocksource gets lost after live migration > > Hi, > this is more for the KVM folks I suppose…c

[Users] Pseudo Guest Agent for unsupported VM distro

2014-04-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, from my understanding it should be possible to provide an absolute minimalistic guest agent functionality by writing a 5-liner that fills some basic info into the virto serial device within the guest VM. At least from what I can read in the source at github or the docs: https://github.com/

Re: [Users] Pseudo Guest Agent for unsupported VM distro

2014-04-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. April 2014 15:23 > An: Markus Stockhausen; ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [Users] Pseudo Guest Agent for unsupported VM distro > > On 04/06/2014 12:19 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > Hello, > > > >

Re: [Users] Pseudo Guest Agent for unsupported VM distro

2014-04-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Markus Stockhausen > Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. April 2014 11:19 > An: ovirt-users > Betreff: Pseudo Guest Agent for unsupported VM distro > > Hello, > > from my understanding it should be possible to provide an absolute > minimalistic guest agent functionality by w

Re: [ovirt-users] Windows Server 2016 client licensing costs

2017-04-25 Thread Markus Stockhausen
rs if there might be the possibility to relocate the VM between them online (VMWare 6 and higher). >From a technical perspective OVirt virtualization has the same limits. So setup small dedicated Windows (or Oracle clusters) to keep costs down. Markus Mit freundlichen Grüßen Markus Sto

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance differences between ext4 and XFS

2017-06-07 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi Fernando, we personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2 (even for snapshots in OVirt) comes close to a no-go these days. We are experience excessive fragmentation. For more info see unresolved Redhat Info: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663 Even with tuning the XFS allocation poli

[ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS contraproductive

2017-06-16 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, we just set up a new 4.1.2 OVirt cluster. It is a quite normal HDD/XFS/NFS stack that worked quit well with 4.0 in the past. Inside the VMs we use XFS too. To our surprise we observe abysmal high IO during mkfs.xfs and fstrim inside the VM. A simple example: Step 1: Create 100G Thin disk Res

Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS contraproductive

2017-06-18 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Thanks for all your feedback. Im trying to collect all the infos in BZ1462504. Von: Fabrice Bacchella [fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr] Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. Juni 2017 10:13 An: Idan Shaby Cc: Markus Stockhausen; Ovirt Users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt

Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS contraproductive

2017-06-18 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Yaniv Kaul [yk...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. Juni 2017 09:58 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Ovirt Users > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] OVirt 4.1.2 - trim/discard on HDD/XFS/NFS > contraproductive On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Markus Stockhausen mailto:stock

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1.2 sanlock issue with nfs data domain

2017-06-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Maybe NFS Mounts with Version 4.2 and on Server side no SELinux nfs_t rule defined? Sent from mobile... Am 19.06.2017 11:01 vorm. schrieb Moritz Baumann : > Is there a way to "reinitialize" the lockspace so one node can become > SPM again and we can run VMS. errors in /var/log/sanlock.log look

[ovirt-users] VM live migration and NFS 4.2

2017-06-25 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, we are currently evaluating NFS 4.2 based storage for OVirt 4.1.2. Normal operation and discard support work like a charm. For some strange reason we cannot use VM live migration any more. As soon as one NFS 4.2 based VM disk is doing disk I/O during the operation. VM stalls and is pause

Re: [ovirt-users] VM live migration and NFS 4.2

2017-06-26 Thread Markus Stockhausen
, Markus Stockhausen mailto:stockhau...@collogia.de>> wrote: Hi, we are currently evaluating NFS 4.2 based storage for OVirt 4.1.2. Normal operation and discard support work like a charm. For some strange reason we cannot use VM live migration any more. As soon as one NFS 4.2 based VM disk is

[ovirt-users] CentOS 7.4, qemu 2.9 -> Gluster 3.xx?

2017-09-21 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, given the fact that a current yum update will bring Centos 7.4 and qemu 2.9 to the nodes I wonder if a gluster update thorugh Ovirt repos is already close to release? Not only is 3.8 EOL but also I like to minimize the update steps to a new stable package level. Best regards. Markus

[ovirt-users] Upgrade order 3.4.2 -> 3.5.x

2014-10-31 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, maybe a stupid one. Just want to make sure that nothing goes wrong. We plan to make a rolling upgrade of our landscape going to 3.5.1 in december. So we always need some hypervisor nodes up and running during the process. Looking at older posts I assume that upgrading the engine should be suf

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade order 3.4.2 -> 3.5.x

2014-10-31 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, sorry I forgot that: NFS, engine is running in a qemu VM "outside" the cluster. Markus Von: Gabi C [gab...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Oktober 2014 12:12 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: ovirt-users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade order 3.4.

Re: [ovirt-users] disabling generic-receive-offload (gro) and large-receive-offload ?

2014-11-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi Ernest, we have similar issues with IPoIB. To fix it we use VDSM hooks: # cat /usr/libexec/vdsm/hooks/before_vdsm_start/network.sh ... ethtool -K ib0 tso off 2>/dev/null ethtool -K ib1 tso off 2>/dev/null ... Nevertheless this is similar to running self defined init scripts. But at least I ha

Re: [ovirt-users] Live Merge Functionality disabled on CentOS 6.6 Node and oVirt 3.5.0

2014-11-20 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Iirc you simply need libvirt 1.2.9 Am 20.11.2014 16:20 schrieb Bob Doolittle : Are there any bugs related to the changes in question that we can track so we know when the changes are reflected in our distros of interest? Thanks, Bob On 11/20/2014 03:51 AM, s k wrote: > Hi, > > > Live snapsho

[ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

2014-11-20 Thread Markus Stockhausen
_ Von: Bob Doolittle [b...@doolittle.us.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 16:49 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: s k; users@ovirt.org; Daniel Helgenberger; Coffee Chou Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Live Merge Functionality disabled on CentOS 6.6 Node and oVirt 3.5.0 On 11/20/201

Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

2014-11-20 Thread Markus Stockhausen
everything from virt-preview - Wait for FC21 - Wait for Centos 21 Still a long way to go to get all the beloved features out of the box. Markus Von: Bob Doolittle [b...@doolittle.us.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 19:38 An: Markus Stockhausen

Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

2014-11-20 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Wow. Very quick test. Thanks for sharing the results. I will have a look what qemu 1.6.2 might need. Regarding stability of qemu 2.1.2: You should scan the qemu stable mailing list if some severe fixes have been posted after the release. If you feel comfortable take qemu from the preview repo

Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster

2014-11-21 Thread Markus Stockhausen
[users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "Markus Stockhausen [stockhau...@collogia.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. November 2014 08:38 An: Gianluca Cecchi Cc: s k; users@ovirt.org Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Simple way to activate live merge in FC20 cluster Wow. Very quick test. Thanks for s

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Sync: November 26, 2014

2014-11-26 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Brian Proffitt [bprof...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 17:01 > An: users > Cc: board > Betreff: [ovirt-users] oVirt Weekly Sync: November 26, 2014 > ... > * 3.6 status Still gathering 3.6 features a

Re: [ovirt-users] ksmd high cpu usage from almost a week with just one vm running

2014-12-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Memory usage > 80%: ksm kicks in. There it will run at full speed until usage is below 80%. There is an open BZ from me. Bad behaviour is controlled by mom. Markus Am 06.12.2014 15:58 schrieb mad Engineer : Hello All, I am using centos6.5 x64 on a server with 48 G RAM and 8 Cores.Ma

[ovirt-users] qemu update & Windows activation

2014-12-18 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, we just build a new cluster with FC20 + virt-preview repos enabled. Idea behind that is to enable snapshot live merge feature. This seems to work quite well. The only culprit is the Windows activation. For some reasons the VM hardware of the old qemu 1.6/seabios 1.7.3 hypervisors is differ

Re: [ovirt-users] How long do your migrations last?

2015-02-13 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Darrell Budic [bu...@onholyground.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Februar 2015 19:03 > An: Nicolas Ecarnot > Cc: users > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] How long do your migrations last? > > I’m under the impression it depends m

[ovirt-users] movirt -> ovirt 3.5.1 -> server error 500

2015-02-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, just installed movirt on my mobile. Upon connection it breaks with the attached error in the 3.5.1 engine server logs. Something I'm missing? Markus 2015-02-19 12:21:19,757 ERROR [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[default-host].[/ovirt-engine/api]] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702

Re: [ovirt-users] movirt -> ovirt 3.5.1 -> server error 500

2015-02-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Juan Hernández [jhern...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015 12:53 > An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] movirt -> ovirt 3.5.1 -> server error 500 > > On 02/19/2015 12:22 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > Hi,

[ovirt-users] Fedora 21 as Ovirt (hypervisor) host

2015-03-16 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, back in december there was a discussion about Ovirt on Fedora 21. From my point of view that was about ovirt engine. So I'm somehow lost if Fedora 21 is at least supported as hypervisor host. Anyone with deeper knowledge? The reason I'm asking: We are currently on FC20 + virt-preview and enj

[ovirt-users] Live migration fails - domain not found -

2015-03-18 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, although we already upgraded several hypervisor nodes to Ovirt 3.5.1 the newest upgrade has left the host in a very strang state. We did: - Host was removed from cluster - Ovirt 3.5 repo was activated on host - Host was "reinstalled" from enging And we got: - A host that is active and look

Re: [ovirt-users] Live migration fails - domain not found -

2015-03-18 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Paul Heinlein [heinl...@madboa.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. März 2015 18:43 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: Users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Live migration fails - domain not found - > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > > althou

[ovirt-users] Fedora 20 as hypervisor

2014-05-02 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, did not find any discussion thread about this topic. Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor host for OVirt 3.4 environments? Thanks. Markus Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich gesc

Re: [ovirt-users] Jpackage down

2014-05-17 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Hi guys, > > I'm doing an urgent ovirt upgrade from 3.2(dreyou) to 3.4 (official) > but I see that www.jpackage.org is down. > > I've managed to install jboss-as-7.1.1-11.el6.x86_64 from another > location, however I'm not sure if this will be compatible with 3.4, as > per the instructions from

Re: [ovirt-users] Jpackage down

2014-05-17 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Markus Stockhausen [stockhau...@collogia.de] > Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Mai 2014 16:04 > An: Neil; users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Jpackage down > > > Hi guys, > > &g

[ovirt-users] Fedora 20 and virt-preview

2014-05-19 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, just wanted to know if enabling virt-preview repo on a FC20 hypervisor node may break Ovirt 3.4.1. Especially the incompatible changes mentioned here: http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/2.0#Incompatible_changes FC20 stock: qemu 1.6.2 FC20 virt-previe: qemu 2.0.0 Best regards. Markus **

[ovirt-users] QEMU hangup with SPICE console

2014-05-21 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, our hypervisor nodes are running on FC19. virt-preview repos is activated. Windows VMs are using SPICE protocol. >From time to time we see hangups of the windows machines. QEMU has 100% CPU and a perf report gives the following output: Samples: 70K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx

Re: [ovirt-users] what's the problem with www.jpackage.org?

2014-05-22 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Nathanaël Blanchet [blanc...@abes.fr] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2014 12:04 > An: users > Betreff: [ovirt-users] what's the problem with www.jpackage.org? > > My hosts installation always fails because of missing jpac

Re: [ovirt-users] QEMU hangup with SPICE console

2014-05-22 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Michal Skrivanek [michal.skriva...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2014 13:17 > An: Markus Stockhausen > Cc: ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] QEMU hangup with SPICE console > > On 22 May 2014, at 08:48, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > > Hel

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Infiniband Support - Etherrnet vs Infiniband

2014-06-01 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "René Koch [rk...@linuxland.at] > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Mai 2014 21:08 > An: ml ml > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt Infiniband Support - Etherrnet vs Infiniband > > On 05/30/2014 04:55 PM, ml ml wr

[ovirt-users] Live migration - quest VM stall

2014-06-09 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, at the moment we are investigating stalls of Windows XP VMs during live migration. Our environment consists of: - FC20 hypervisor nodes - qemu 1.6.2 - OVirt 3.4.1 - Guest: Windows XP SP2 - VM Disks: Virtio & IDE tested - SPICE / VNC: both tested - Balloon: With & without tested - Cluster c

[ovirt-users] After Upgrade to 3.4.2 no conole icon activation

2014-06-13 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, after starting a VM in webadmin on ovirt engine 3.4.2 we have to manually switch to another VM and back to get the console icon active. Is this behaviour desired? Markus Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/ode

Re: [ovirt-users] After Upgrade to 3.4.2 no conole icon activation

2014-06-15 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Already reported and confirmed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109376 Von: Andrew Lau [and...@andrewklau.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. Juni 2014 02:05 An: Markus Stockhausen Cc: ovirt-users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] After Upgrade to 3.4.2 no

[ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update

2014-06-24 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hi, after a maintenance of one of our hosts, vdsmd does not start anymore. Error could be narrowed down to the following command: [root ~]# /usr/bin/vdsm-tool is-configured Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/vdsm-tool", line 145, in sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/bin/vdsm-too

Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update

2014-06-24 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Markus Stockhausen [stockhau...@collogia.de] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2014 09:53 > An: ovirt-users > Betreff: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update > > Hi, > &

Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update

2014-06-24 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: Bob Doolittle [b...@doolittle.us.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2014 15:56 > An: Dan Kenigsberg; Markus Stockhausen > Cc: ovirt-users > Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update > > Is there a bugID that can be tracked? Hopefully ope

[ovirt-users] Best way to define migration bandwidth

2014-06-25 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Hello, right now we modify /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf on each host to raise migration bandwidth on our IPoIB network. Is there any place to set it permanently? If not I'll file a RFE. Markus Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche u

Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update

2014-06-25 Thread Markus Stockhausen
. Markus Von: Douglas Schilling Landgraf [dougsl...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2014 23:23 An: Dan Kenigsberg; Markus Stockhausen Cc: ovirt-users Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] FC20 vdsmd broken after latest yum update On 06/24/2014 04:35 AM, Dan

Re: [ovirt-users] Spam Re: [Video]: New Live Migration Progess Bar for oVirt

2014-07-02 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Maurice James [mja...@media-node.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juni 2014 16:33 > An: Brian Proffitt > Cc: users > Betreff: [ovirt-users] Spam Re: [Video]: New Live Migration Progess Bar > for oVirt > > is that progress

[ovirt-users] Snapshot deletion performance [was Latency]

2014-07-06 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von > "Maurice James [mja...@media-node.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Juni 2014 01:42 > An: users > Betreff: [ovirt-users] Spam Latency > > I noticed that the following operations take way, way too long: > Any type of import/exp

Re: [ovirt-users] Removal of snapshot taking too long

2014-07-16 Thread Markus Stockhausen
> Von: users-boun...@ovirt.org [users-boun...@ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "André > Freitas [afrei...@ubiwhere.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014 15:22 > An: users@ovirt.org > Betreff: [ovirt-users] Removal of snapshot taking too long > > Hi, > > i don't know if its normal but i'm having sit

  1   2   3   >