[ovirt-users] NFS and pass discards\unmap question

2017-02-02 Thread Sergey Kulikov
I've upgraded to 4.1 release, it have great feature "Pass discards", that now can be used without vdsm hooks, After upgrade I've tested it with NFS 4.1 storage, exported from netapp, but unfortunately found out, that it's not working, after some investigation, I've found, that NFS

Re: [ovirt-users] [Call for feedback] did you install/update to 4.1.0?

2017-02-03 Thread Sergey Kulikov
Title: Re: [ovirt-users] [Call for feedback] did you install/update to 4.1.0? On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:59 PM, wrote: Updated from 4.0.6 Docs are quite incomplete, it's not mentioned about installing ovirt-release41 on centos HV and ovirt-nodes manually, you need to

[ovirt-users] node-ng update failed from ovirt-node-ng-4.1.0-0 to ovirt-node-ng-image-4.1.0-1, and NM + iscsi boo issue

2017-02-06 Thread Sergey Kulikov
1) I've updated from 4.0.6 to 4.1.0 (on Feb 01 node-ng was at version 4.1.0-0) After some time engine alerted, that this node have updates to ovirt-node-ng-image-4.1.0-1, but update from engine timed out, there were hanging processes in ps on this node: root 36309 0.0 0.0 113120 1564 ?

Re: [ovirt-users] node-ng update failed from ovirt-node-ng-4.1.0-0 to ovirt-node-ng-image-4.1.0-1, and NM + iscsi boo issue

2017-02-07 Thread Sergey Kulikov
; flag, also... > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona...@redhat.com> wrote: > Adding Douglas and Ryan > Il 06/Feb/2017 13:32, "Sergey Kulikov" <ser...@msm.ru> ha scritto: > 1) I've updated from 4.0.6 to 4.1.0 (on Feb 01 node-ng was at version &g

[ovirt-users] seem that SuperUser role isn't super.

2017-02-07 Thread Sergey Kulikov
I've tried to add publickey to user, that have SuperUser role defined (tried as admin@internal, and as another user with SuperUser role), But UI says, that no permission for logged in user, finally I was able to add publickey only after assigning UserProfileEditor role to that users. oVirt 4.1

Re: [ovirt-users] seem that SuperUser role isn't super.

2017-02-07 Thread Sergey Kulikov
And also it seems strange, that user can't edit own profile, or it was designed that way? If user disallowed to edit own profile there is even no way for admin to manage user keys, I can't find such options in UI for editing user profiles, only for assigning permissions. or maybe I need to add

Re: [ovirt-users] seem that SuperUser role isn't super.

2017-02-07 Thread Sergey Kulikov
admin role can't use the user functions). > This bit me early on. > -derek > On Tue, February 7, 2017 4:26 pm, Sergey Kulikov wrote: >> >> I've tried to add publickey to user, that have SuperUser role defined >> (tried as admin@internal, and as another user with Sup

Re: [ovirt-users] NFS and pass discards\unmap question

2017-02-03 Thread Sergey Kulikov
Unfortunately I can't browse this bug: "You are not authorized to access bug #1079385." Can you email me details on ths bug? I think that's the reason I can't find this fix for rhel\centos in google) -- Friday, February 3, 2017, 14:45:43: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:

Re: [ovirt-users] NFS and pass discards\unmap question

2017-02-03 Thread Sergey Kulikov
tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=6,sec=sys,local_lock=none) it should work only if forced option vers=4.2 ? I thought it's implemented as feature to older version, not 4.2, there is few info about this. -- Friday, February 3, 2017, 14:45:43: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Sergey

Re: [ovirt-users] NFS and pass discards\unmap question

2017-02-03 Thread Sergey Kulikov
: > On Feb 3, 2017 1:50 PM, "Nir Soffer" <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Sergey Kulikov <ser...@msm.ru> wrote: >> >> >> Hm... maybe I need to set any options, is there any way to force ovirt to >> mount w

[ovirt-users] strange behavior of ovirt-node ng update

2017-03-23 Thread Sergey Kulikov
I have one Ovirt Node in my test cluster(others are centos), I'm observing strange behavior of update checker in engine. In options I can see: engine=# select * from vdc_options where option_name='OvirtNodePackageNamesForCheckUpdate'; option_id | option_name |

[ovirt-users] trying to test engine metrics, using ovirt-engine-metrics package

2017-06-02 Thread Sergey Kulikov
Hi! I'm trying to deploy metrics in my ovirt test enviroment, configured fluentd on dst host, configured /etc/ovirt-engine-metrics/config.yml , after that trying to execute: /usr/share/ovirt-engine-metrics/setup/ansible/configure_ovirt_hosts_for_metrics.sh 4 host are configured correctly (This

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt virtio drivers for fedora 5

2017-12-29 Thread Sergey Kulikov
Title: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt virtio drivers for fedora 5 Maybe you can make this two disks larger, make more extended partitions on them and move partitions from disks 3 and 4 to this two and modify fstab accordingly? Or if you don't need separate mount points you can extend space on / and

[ovirt-users] Found some bugs with NFS.

2018-01-22 Thread Sergey Kulikov
This is test environment, running Centos 7.4, oVirt 4.2.0, kernel 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64 (3.10.0-693.11.1 and 3.10.0-693 have same bugs) 1. Can't force NFS to 4.0. Some time ago, I've set my NFS version for all storage domains to V4, because there was a bug with Netapp data ontap 8.x and

Re: [ovirt-users] Found some bugs with NFS.

2018-01-23 Thread Sergey Kulikov
. But first part is directly related to ovirt, I think. -- Tuesday, January 23, 2018, 21:59:12: On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Sergey Kulikov <ser...@msm.ru> wrote: Or maybe somebody can point me to the right place for submitting this? Thanks. :) CentOS have a bugtracker[1], but I

Re: [ovirt-users] Found some bugs with NFS.

2018-01-23 Thread Sergey Kulikov
Or maybe somebody can point me to the right place for submitting this? Thanks. :) --- Monday, January 22, 2018, 14:10:53: > This is test environment, running Centos 7.4, oVirt 4.2.0, kernel > 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64 (3.10.0-693.11.1 and 3.10.0-693 have same bugs) > > > 1. Can't force

[ovirt-users] update to 4.4 fails with "Domain format is different from master storage domain format" (v4.3 cluster with V4 NFS storage domains)

2020-09-29 Thread Sergey Kulikov
Hello, I'm trying to update our hosted-engine ovirt to version 4.4 from 4.3.10 and everything goes fine until hosted-engine --deploy tries to add new hosted_storage domain, we have NFS storage domains, and it fails with error: [ INFO ] TASK [ovirt.hosted_engine_setup : Activate storage

[ovirt-users] Re: update to 4.4 fails with "Domain format is different from master storage domain format" (v4.3 cluster with V4 NFS storage domains)

2020-09-30 Thread Sergey Kulikov
I was able to finish update manually creating hosted_storage domain from new engine web interface after first failure, in this case it was created with format V4 and ansible playbook doesn't recreate it, after updating engine and host updating cluster compatibility level to 4.4 also updated

[ovirt-users] Re: update to 4.4 fails with "Domain format is different from master storage domain format" (v4.3 cluster with V4 NFS storage domains)

2020-09-30 Thread Sergey Kulikov
:18: > Are you trying to use the same storage domain ? > I hope not, as this is not supposed to be done like that.As far as I remember > - you need fresh storage. > Best Regards, > Strahil NIkolov > В вторник, 29 септември 2020 г., 20:07:51 Гринуич+3, Sergey