of
multipath, with a dedicated raid group and ioping don't report latency.
2017-05-13 2:00 GMT+02:00 Juan Pablo <pablo.localh...@gmail.com>:
> sorry to jump in, but what kernel version are you using? had similar issue
> with kernel 4.10/4.11
>
>
> 2017-05-12 16:36 GMT-03:0
:128 active ready running
2017-05-13 18:50 GMT+02:00 Juan Pablo <pablo.localh...@gmail.com>:
> can you please give the output of:
> multipath -ll
> and
> iscsiadm -m session -P3
>
> JP
>
> 2017-05-13 6:48 GMT-03:00 Stefano Bovina <bov...@gmail.com>:
>
s,
Stefano
2017-05-08 11:56 GMT+02:00 Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com>:
>
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stefano Bovina <bov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes,
>> this configuration is the one suggested by EMC for EL7.
>>
>
> https://access.redhat.c
Thank you very much.
What about "direct lun" usage and database example?
2017-06-08 16:40 GMT+02:00 Elad Ben Aharon <ebena...@redhat.com>:
> Hi,
> Answer inline
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Stefano Bovina <bov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> H
Hi,
does a storage best practise document for oVirt exist?
Some examples:
oVirt allows to extend an existing storage domain: Is it better to keep a
1:1 relation between LUN and oVirt storage domain?
If not, is it better to avoid adding LUNs to an already existing storage
domain?
Following the
Hi, the engine logs show high latency on storage domains: "Storage domain
experienced a high latency of 19.2814 seconds from .. This may
cause performance and functional issues."
Looking at host logs, I found also these locking errors:
2017-05-02 20:52:13+0200 33883 [10098]: s1 renewal
Hi, while trying to update a VM disk, a failure was returned (forcing me to
add a new disk)
Any advice on how to resolve this error?
Thanks
Installation info:
ovirt-release35-006-1.noarch
libgovirt-0.3.3-1.el7_2.1.x86_64
vdsm-4.16.30-0.el7.centos.x86_64
vdsm-xmlrpc-4.16.30-0.el7.centos.noarch
oalua
failbackimmediate
rr_weight uniform
no_path_retry 60
rr_min_io 1
}
}
Regards,
Stefano
2017-05-07 8:36 GMT+02:00 Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com>:
>
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Stefa
it should be fine.
2017-05-08 9:39 GMT+02:00 Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com>:
>
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Stefano Bovina <bov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sense data are 0x0/0x0/0x0
>
>
> Interesting - first time I'm seeing 0/0/0. The 1st is usually 0x2 (see
Hi,
Ok, ignore what I said regards step 2. The volume exists.
2017-05-07 20:27 GMT+02:00 Stefano Bovina <bov...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
> 1)
> What do you need exactly? Shutdown VM, edit disk, "extend size by" --->
> error
>
> 2)
> storage domain is up and runn
10 matches
Mail list logo
