[ovirt-users] Re: RFE: Add the ability to the engine to serve as a fencing proxy

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:04 PM Strahil wrote: > I think poison pill-based fencing is easier to implement but it requires > either Network-based (iSCSI or NFS) or FC-based shared storage. > > It is used in corosync/pacemaker clusters and is easier to implement. > Corosync/pacemake uses

[ovirt-users] Re: RFE: Add the ability to the engine to serve as a fencing proxy

I think poison pill-based fencing is easier to implement but it requires either Network-based (iSCSI or NFS) or FC-based shared storage. It is used in corosync/pacemaker clusters and is easier to implement. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Aug 8, 2019 11:29, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >

[ovirt-users] Re: RFE: Add the ability to the engine to serve as a fencing proxy

Il giorno ven 2 ago 2019 alle ore 10:50 Sandro E ha scritto: > Hi, > > i hope that this hits the right people i found an RFE (Bug 1373957) which > would be a realy nice feature for my company as we have to request firewall > rules for every new host and this ends up in a lot of mess and work.