[ovirt-users] Re: video virtio (instead of qxl)

> On 15 Jul 2020, at 19:05, Michael Lipp wrote: > > Am 15.07.20 um 17:36 schrieb Michal Skrivanek: >> >>> On 14 Jul 2020, at 16:44, Michael Lipp wrote: >>> >>> Am 14.07.20 um 15:27 schrieb Michal Skrivanek: > This works perfectly with my Fedora 32 and Arch guests and the change is >

[ovirt-users] Re: video virtio (instead of qxl)

Am 15.07.20 um 17:36 schrieb Michal Skrivanek: > >> On 14 Jul 2020, at 16:44, Michael Lipp wrote: >> >> Am 14.07.20 um 15:27 schrieb Michal Skrivanek: This works perfectly with my Fedora 32 and Arch guests and the change is really worth it. >>> Hi, >>> what kind of performance benefits

[ovirt-users] Re: video virtio (instead of qxl)

> On 14 Jul 2020, at 16:44, Michael Lipp wrote: > > Am 14.07.20 um 15:27 schrieb Michal Skrivanek: >> >>> This works perfectly with my Fedora 32 and Arch guests and the change is >>> really worth it. >> Hi, >> what kind of performance benefits you’ve seen? >> >> It’s not currently in near t

[ovirt-users] Re: video virtio (instead of qxl)

> On 14 Jul 2020, at 13:48, Michael Lipp wrote: > >> Do you mean virtio-vga / virtio-gpu? > > virtio-vga. To be specific (libvirt): > > > > > > function='0x0'/> > > > which results in: > > -device virtio-vga,id=video0,virgl=off,max_outputs=1,bus=pci.0,addr=

[ovirt-users] Re: video virtio (instead of qxl)

> Do you mean virtio-vga / virtio-gpu? virtio-vga. To be specific (libvirt): which results in: -device virtio-vga,id=video0,virgl=off,max_outputs=1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x2 This works perfectly with my Fedora 32 and Arch guests and the change is really worth

[ovirt-users] Re: video virtio (instead of qxl)

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:44 AM Michael Lipp wrote: > Hi, > > I've searched to no avail: is it possible to use video virtio (instead of > qxl) in a VM managed by oVirt? I have much better performance with video > virtio when testing this with "plain" libvirt. > > I would have at least expected t