Also keep in mind that extensive logging in the vm's can seriously
impact your fs performance, so using a central syslogserver is a really
good idea.
/tony
On 2018-04-06 17:03, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>
>
> Den 6 apr. 2018 15:46 skrev Jayme :
>
> Yaniv,
>
> I
Den 6 apr. 2018 15:46 skrev Jayme :Yaniv,I appreciate your input, thanks! I understand that everyone's use case is different, but I was hoping to hear from some users that are using oVirt hyper-converged setup and get some input on the performance. When I research GlusterFS I
It's likely possibile you will get more performance from a NFS server
compared to Gluster. Specially if on your NFS server you have something
like ZFS + SSD for L2ARC or ext4 + Bcache, but you get not redundancy. If
you NFS server dies everything stops working, which is not the case with
Yaniv,
I appreciate your input, thanks!
I understand that everyone's use case is different, but I was hoping to
hear from some users that are using oVirt hyper-converged setup and get
some input on the performance. When I research GlusterFS I hear a lot
about how it can be slow especially when
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 12:39 AM Jayme wrote:
> Vincent,
>
> I've been back and forth on SSDs vs HDDs and can't really get a clear
> answer. You are correct though, it would only equal 4TB usable in the end
> which is pretty crazy but that amount of 7200 RPM HDDs equals about the
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 11:39 PM Vincent Royer wrote:
> Jayme,
>
> I'm doing a very similar build, the only difference really is I am using
> SSDs instead of HDDs. I have similar questions as you regarding expected
> performance. Have you considered JBOD + NFS? Putting a
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 11:51 PM FERNANDO FREDIANI
wrote:
> I always found replica 3 a complete overkill. Don't know people made that
> up that was necessary. Just looks good and costs a lot with little benefit.
>
It's not very easy to solve split brain with only 2.
You
Well good, we can at least bounce ideas off each other, and I'm sure we'll
get some good advice sooner or later! Best way to get good ideas on the
internet is to post bad ones and wait ;)
In the performance and sizing guide PDF, they make this statement:
*Standard servers with 4:2 erasure coding
Vincent,
I've been back and forth on SSDs vs HDDs and can't really get a clear
answer. You are correct though, it would only equal 4TB usable in the end
which is pretty crazy but that amount of 7200 RPM HDDs equals about the
same cost as 3 2TB ssds would. I actually posted a question to this
I always found replica 3 a complete overkill. Don't know people made that
up that was necessary. Just looks good and costs a lot with little benefit.
Normally when using magnetic disks 2 copies are fine for most scenarios,
but if using SSDs for similar scenarios depending on the configuration of
Jayme,
I'm doing a very similar build, the only difference really is I am using
SSDs instead of HDDs. I have similar questions as you regarding expected
performance. Have you considered JBOD + NFS? Putting a Gluster Replica 3
on top of RAID 10 arrays sounds very safe, but my gosh the capacity
Thanks for your feedback. Any other opinions on this proposed setup? I'm
very torn over using GlusterFS and what the expected performance may be,
there seems to be little information out there. Would love to hear any
feedback specifically from ovirt users on hyperconverged configurations.
On
Hi,
You should be ok with the setup.
I am running around 20 vms (linux and windows, small and medium size) with
the half of your specs. With 10G network replica 3 is ok.
Alex
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:13 Jayme wrote:
> I'm spec'ing hardware for a 3-node oVirt build (on
13 matches
Mail list logo