Ok, thanks, looks like a BUG, I will open one...
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> >
> >
> > Define QoS on the NIC.
> > But I think you wish to limit IO, no?
> > Y.
> >
> For the moment QoS is unlimited.
> Actually for some tasks
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> Define QoS on the NIC.
> But I think you wish to limit IO, no?
> Y.
>
For the moment QoS is unlimited.
Actually for some tasks I wish to allocate 80% of 10Gbit interface,
but the VM interface is always 1Gbit.
Inside the
On Nov 19, 2017 11:05 PM, "Arman Khalatyan" wrote:
hi Yaniv,
yes for sure I hit some cache in between but not the vm cache, it has a 4GB
ram, with oflag=direct I get about 120MB/s
for the data analysis the cache is our friend:)
The backend is a lustrefs 2.10.x.
yes we have
hi Yaniv,
yes for sure I hit some cache in between but not the vm cache, it has a 4GB
ram, with oflag=direct I get about 120MB/s
for the data analysis the cache is our friend:)
The backend is a lustrefs 2.10.x.
yes we have dedicated 10G on the hosts, where we can limit the vm interface
to
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Arman Khalatyan wrote:
> Hi, in our environment we got pretty good io performance on VM, with
> following configuration:
> lustrebox: /lust mounted on "GATEWAY" over IB
> GATEWAY: export /lust as nfs4 on 10G interface
> VM(test.vm): import as
6 matches
Mail list logo