Thanks Gordon. Just to clarify default behaviour - for Java clients the default
is 120s but for C++/Python clients the heartbeating is off and must be
explicitly set? In other words, C++/Python clients that are dead (OS crash,
network problems, client is hung) will be never removed from broker
Hi Gordon,
Comments inline below.
Frase
On 09/04/13 19:07, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 6 April 2013 10:40, Fraser Adams fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
The x-bindings property is not currently supported for AMQP 1.0 in
nodes or links. This has really been a question of priorities rather
than
On 10 April 2013 13:38, Fraser Adams fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Hi Gordon,
Comments inline below.
Frase
On 09/04/13 19:07, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 6 April 2013 10:40, Fraser Adams fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk**
wrote:
[.. snip ..]
Re using a selector I have to say that
Hi, everyone. We've recently been discussing the components of our
project in a couple different contexts. This is a proposal to take
the outcomes of those discussion and apply them to how Qpid is
organized.
Thanks for taking a look,
Justin
## Related discussions
-
I'm +1 this... Obviously we need to understand better the amount of work to
achieve the separation of the components... but if this were in place then
we wouldn't be facing the sort of issues we are currently experiencing with
the 0.22 release which would strongly benefit from not having the
Good catch Bill - this is a bug, and I've entered a JIRA for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4732
That said, I would urge you not to use the QPID connection directly. The API
doesn't explicitly expose this, and we probably will be moving the QMF client
to use the client
Hi D James,
I'm pretty sure the ssl options were added to qpid-config _after_ 0.18. I
think they first appeared in the 0.20 release.
Does qpid-config --help list them?
-K
- Original Message -
From: djames dpgja...@gmail.com
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Ken,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
Good catch Bill - this is a bug, and I've entered a JIRA for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4732
That said, I would urge you not to use the QPID connection directly. The
API doesn't explicitly
+1 on this.
Having the flexibility to have individual release cycles for each component
will be huge advantage for us.
However as Justin mentioned, we shouldn't rule out a Qpid wide release
perhaps once a year or so.
From a users perspective this is a great thing to have, bcos all the
components
Hi Ken,
I don't know about the Qpid 0.18 release, but he might be using MRG-M 2.3
which reports it self as Qpid 0.18 and contains the SSL support in
qpid-config.
Regards
Jakub
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi D James,
I'm pretty sure the ssl options
- Original Message -
From: Bill Freeman ke1g...@gmail.com
To: users users@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:23:04 AM
Subject: Re: Maybe bug, maybe novice mistake, or maybe my python qpid library
is too old.
Ken,
snip
As long as I have your attention, does
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:55:22AM -0400, Justin Ross wrote:
Hi, everyone. We've recently been discussing the components of our
project in a couple different contexts. This is a proposal to take
the outcomes of those discussion and apply them to how Qpid is
organized.
+1
--
Darryl L.
+1 from me as well. I think this would be a good improvement on the
existing structure and benefit everyone by allowing for schedules more
tailored to the specific components, and in turn enable us to better meet
the needs of their users.
We would need to investigate how some of the changes might
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bill Freeman ke1g...@gmail.com
To: users users@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:23:04 AM
Subject: Re: Maybe bug, maybe novice mistake, or maybe my python qpid
From a user point of view ... if the client libraries have independent
releases, it might be more clear to many people that they do not need to
use exactly the same version of the client library as is the broker
version. That seems to be quite popular believe among the people connecting
to our
15 matches
Mail list logo