Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.27.0 (RC2)

2018-04-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 18 April 2018 at 21:01, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have put together a second spin for a Qpid Proton-J 0.27.0 release, please > test it and vote accordingly. > > The source and binary archives can be grabbed from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton-j/0.27.0-rc2/ >

Re: Proposed Feature Removal from Dispatch Router

2018-04-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 16 April 2018 at 19:24, Ken Giusti wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Alan Conway wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Alan Conway wrote: >>> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: >>> > >>> >> Yeah, ex

Re: Proposed Feature Removal from Dispatch Router

2018-04-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On 17 April 2018 at 17:10, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 17/04/18 14:24, Ken Giusti wrote: >> >> After thinking about the comments on this thread and >> spending some time researching various "reliable multicast" solutions >> I've come to the conclusion that we *should* allow multicasting >> unsettled me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton-J 0.27.0 (RC2)

2018-04-19 Thread Keith W
+1 * Built and ran tests from source bundle (Java 1.8.0_162-b12, Mac OS X 10.11.6) * Ran Broker-J's JMS client integrations test suites against staged artefacts (mvn integration-test -DskipTests -DskipITs=false) * Performed an adhoc JMS client test similar to that that allowed by to raise PROTON-1