I assume symbols prefixed with "_" are to be considered part of the private
API. What are the guidelines and legalities, if any, of bringing in these
private symbols into our own code?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Fabrício de Novaes Kucinskis <
fabricio.kucins...@inpe.br> wrote:
> Hi Mathew and Joel,
>
>
>
> On the past, I’ve used the following code to get individual task usage and
> monitor tasks behavior through time. It’s completely based on
> rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin and I know it’s not the best way to do
> it, but worked for me .
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Fabrício.
>
>
>
> /**
>
> * Returns the task usage in us. If the taskId is zero, returns the time
> since boot.
>
> * Code based on ‘rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin’.
>
> **/
>
> uint64_t *TasksStatusList::GetCpuUsagePerTask*(*const* rtems_id )
>
> {
>
> *if* (taskId == 0)
>
> {
>
>*struct* timespec uptime;
>
>*struct* timespec total;
>
>
>
>*rtems_clock_get_uptime*();
>
>
> *_Timespec_Subtract*(_usage_Uptime_at_last_reset,
> , );
>
>
>
>uint64_t totalCpuUsageInUs = (total.tv_sec
> * *static_cast*(100)) + (total.tv_nsec / *static_cast*<
> uint64_t>(1000));
>
>
>
>*return* totalCpuUsageInUs;
>
> }
>
> *else*
>
> {
>
>Objects_Information *ptObjInformation =
> NULL;
>
>Thread_Control
> *ptThread = NULL;
>
>Thread_CPU_usage_t timeRan;
>
>
>
>*for* (uint32_t i = 1; i <=
> OBJECTS_APIS_LAST; i++)
>
>{
>
>*if*
> (!_Objects_Information_table[i])
>
>{
>
>*continue*;
> // that’s ugly, but it works
>
>}
>
>
>
>ptObjInformation =
> _Objects_Information_table[i][1];
>
>
>
>*if* (ptObjInformation !=
> NULL)
>
>{
>
>*for* (
> uint32_t j = 1; j <= ptObjInformation->maximum; j++)
>
>{
>
>
> ptThread = *reinterpret_cast*(ptObjInformation->local_
> table[j]);
>
>
>
>
> *if* (ptThread == NULL)
>
>
> {
>
>
> *continue*; // still
> ugly, still works
>
>
> }
>
>
>
>
> // if the caller task asks for its own cpu usage, the time since the last
> context switch will not be computed
>
>
> *if* (ptThread->Object.id == taskId)
>
>
> {
>
>
> timeRan = ptThread->cpu_time_used;
>
>
>
>
> uint64_t cpuUsageInUs =
> (_Timestamp_Get_seconds() * *static_cast*(100)) +
> (_Timestamp_Get_nanoseconds() / *static_cast*(1000));
>
>
>
>
> *return* cpuUsageInUs;
>
>
> }
>
> }
>
>}
>
>}
>
>
>
>// if the rtemsId doesn’t exist...
>
>*return* 0;
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
> *De:* users [mailto:users-boun...@rtems.org] *Em nome de *Joel Sherrill
> *Enviada em:* quinta-feira, 12 de julho de 2018 11:37
> *Para:* Mathew Benson
> *Cc:* RTEMS
> *Assunto:* Re: CPU utilization
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Mathew Benson
> wrote:
>
> What would be the recommend way to read CPU utilization? Am I correct in
> saying, the best way would be to call rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin()?
> Its ill advised to access the private symbols utilized by the
> rtems_cpu_usage_report_with_plugin() call directly, right? Is there
> another function that I can call to return a structure rather than parsing
> it with the rtems_printer plugin? I haven't dug into the rtems_printer
> object yet, but I'm ass
