Re: MrsP Semaphore and EDF-RMM
On 01/08/18 16:17, Rúben Gonçalves (1150785) wrote: We thought about using OMIP, yes, but we didn't manage to find much on the documentation about configuring that protocol. Is it the same in SMP as it is in uniprocessor? You choose RTEMS_PRIORITY | RTEMS_BINARY_SEMAPHORE | RTEMS_INHERIT_PRIORITY as attributes when calling rtems_semaphore_create() and this enables OMIP? OMIP == priority inheritance in SMP, I guess we have make this more clear in the documentation. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. ___ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: MrsP Semaphore and EDF-RMM
We thought about using OMIP, yes, but we didn't manage to find much on the documentation about configuring that protocol. Is it the same in SMP as it is in uniprocessor? You choose RTEMS_PRIORITY | RTEMS_BINARY_SEMAPHORE | RTEMS_INHERIT_PRIORITY as attributes when calling rtems_semaphore_create() and this enables OMIP? About the MrsP and EDF combo, I don't think there is, and I don't think I am more informed than you in that area also. Thanks for your time, Ruben and Joel. De: Sebastian Huber Enviado: 1 de agosto de 2018 06:26:25 Para: Rúben Gonçalves (1150785); users@rtems.org Assunto: Re: MrsP Semaphore and EDF-RMM Hello, On 31/07/18 15:47, Rúben Gonçalves (1150785) wrote: > > When making some experiments to the behaviour of RTEMS in SMP > configured with EDF and Rate Monotonic Manager we also noticed that > when a *periodic task* tries to obtain a semaphore created with the > Multiprocessor Resource Sharing Protocol (MrsP) the application > returns the status code "RTEMS_INVALID_PRIORITY". > We presume this is due to the fact that MrsP semaphore obtain function > tries to raise the priority of the task to the previously defined > priority ceiling and since the current priority is given by EDF (in a > way don't understand) (using the rate monotonic) the function is not > implemented to deal with that. > Does it make sense? Is it any accurate? the EDF scheduler uses the deadline of a task to determine its priority. The earlier the deadline the higher the priority (lower priority value). The priorities associated with a deadline are higher than the priorities which can be specified by the normal API. > If not, how can MrsP be correctly used with these configurations? This is currently an unsupported use case. You can use the OMIP mutexes together with the EDF scheduler. Are there schedulability analysis results for MrsP + EDF? Maybe the MrsP implementation can be changed to use the highest priority of the executing thread and the mutex object. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. ___ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: MrsP Semaphore and EDF-RMM
Hello, On 31/07/18 15:47, Rúben Gonçalves (1150785) wrote: When making some experiments to the behaviour of RTEMS in SMP configured with EDF and Rate Monotonic Manager we also noticed that when a *periodic task* tries to obtain a semaphore created with the Multiprocessor Resource Sharing Protocol (MrsP) the application returns the status code "RTEMS_INVALID_PRIORITY". We presume this is due to the fact that MrsP semaphore obtain function tries to raise the priority of the task to the previously defined priority ceiling and since the current priority is given by EDF (in a way don't understand) (using the rate monotonic) the function is not implemented to deal with that. Does it make sense? Is it any accurate? the EDF scheduler uses the deadline of a task to determine its priority. The earlier the deadline the higher the priority (lower priority value). The priorities associated with a deadline are higher than the priorities which can be specified by the normal API. If not, how can MrsP be correctly used with these configurations? This is currently an unsupported use case. You can use the OMIP mutexes together with the EDF scheduler. Are there schedulability analysis results for MrsP + EDF? Maybe the MrsP implementation can be changed to use the highest priority of the executing thread and the mutex object. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. ___ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
