2018-02-26 3:07 GMT-03:00 David B Funk :
>
> Just be careful how you do that "expand redirections until no more
> redirections" or you may get caught in a spammer trap.
>
> If you're going thru a professional redirect site like goo.gl or bit.ly
> you're probably
On 2/26/2018 12:55 PM, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, David B Funk wrote:
Just be careful how you do that "expand redirections until no more
redirections" or you may get caught in a spammer trap.
This is why the DecodeShortURLs plugin has an explicit limit of 10
lookups (and
2018-02-26 10:41 GMT-03:00 Dianne Skoll :
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:07:54 -0600 (CST)
> David B Funk wrote:
>
> > So my bet is that the spammers are crafty enough to check things like
> > browser referrer, cookies, etc to detect/differentiate
Hi everybody, I have an opt-in mailing list through MailChimp, and follow all
best practices for my monthly emails. Unfortunately, every time I send out a
list, I'm getting my fingerprint marked by Razor as spammy. SpamAssassin
advice is:
"You're sending messages that people don't want to
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, David B Funk wrote:
Just be careful how you do that "expand redirections until no more
redirections" or you may get caught in a spammer trap.
This is why the DecodeShortURLs plugin has an explicit limit of 10
lookups (and penalizes such with a total of 8 points).
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 11:00 AM, Kevin A. McGrail
> wrote:
>
>> DecodeShortURLs has been on my list of must-have plugins for years, so
>> I was a little surprised it took so long for someone to mention it
>> in this thread.
> Yeah, my firm is going to look at
> Hi Guys! We provide an URIBL that already have a script in Perl to expand
> redirections until no more redirections:
I would be uneasy to follow such redirections on a production email system (as
opposed to eg a spamtrap system). You are likely „confirming“ live email
addresses to the
haveibeenpwned.com has been an interesting source of data for me as I've
been researching more about compromised firms coming through our data
streams.
Regards,
KAM
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:07:54 -0600 (CST)
David B Funk wrote:
> So my bet is that the spammers are crafty enough to check things like
> browser referrer, cookies, etc to detect/differentiate a browser vs a
> link-checker.
Yep. You need to fake your User-Agent (not