On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes
scores.
What I generally look at
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
> > In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
> > just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and high Bayes
> > scores.
>
> What I generally look at is the detailed
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 03/06/2018 12:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
just riding
On 03/06/2018 12:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, RW wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:47:35 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
In this case these were really bad spam so the APOSTROPHE_TOCC is
just riding on the back of other rules, BLs, and
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 19:27:02 -0700
Amir Caspi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just FYI, for those of you who use DecodeShortURLs.pm ... it
> appears that, if you are running in a per-user setup (i.e., running
> spamd as root such that it does a setuid when invoked from
> spamc, and/or allowing
On Mar 6, 2018, at 5:19 PM, RW wrote:
>
> Or probably more commonly when running the spamassassin perl script as
> an ordinary user for test purposes.
Right, if the DB is owned by that user, then they would see the rule fire with
spamassassin and might assume it's
On 03/05/2018 06:57 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?=
* 2.6 APOSTROPHE_TOCC To or CC address
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Mar 5, 2018, at 11:13 PM, John Hardin wrote:
*before* the @ sign.
It may be perfectly valid to do that, but if it happens more often in spam than
in legitimate mail it is useful to us.
I’m seeing a lot of spam lately with
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, David Jones wrote:
On 03/05/2018 06:57 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alex wrote:
To: =?utf-8?Q?DermotO=27reilly?=
*