Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

Hello! I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam score. Is that normal? bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam is set to a negative figure in the SpamAssassin config file. X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.32 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32 tagged_above=-3

Re: Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

Reio Remma skrev den 2018-06-12 09:34: X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32 tagged_above=-3 required=3 tests=[ BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1, TXREP=1.719] autolearn=ham

MISSING_SUBJECT

I had a message marked with: 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no Subject: It did not have a subject, but it did have content (although only encrypted) it also hit: * 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header which makes sense, because the mail did not

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT

Reindl Harald writes: > Am 13.06.2018 um 01:37 schrieb micah anderson: >> I had a message marked with: >> >> 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no >> Subject: >> >> It did not have a subject, but it did have content (although only >> encrypted) it also hit: >>

Re: Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

On 12 Jun 2018, at 3:34, Reio Remma wrote: Hello! I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam score. Is that normal? No, but it is also not especially remarkable. The final operative score is not the score that is used to determine autolearning.

Re: Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

> On 12 Jun 2018, at 17:11, Bill Cole > wrote: > >> On 12 Jun 2018, at 3:34, Reio Remma wrote: >> I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam score. Is >> that normal? >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> X-Spam-Score: 2.32 >> X-Spam-Level: ** >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32