On 17 Dec 2020, at 09:58, John Hardin wrote:
> Such rules are there. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, lots of ham uses
> "invisible" text so it's not useful as a spam sign by itself and it's hard to
> come up with any useful combination rules.
In the "Archive" folder on my work email there
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, @lbutlr wrote:
On 17 Dec 2020, at 16:19, Dave Wreski wrote:
On 12/17/20 6:05 PM, Matt wrote:
Is there a way with spamassassin local.conf to add a higher score
based on source ip address or subnet? Basically the last IP in
"Received:" header.
bad_subnet_add_20_points:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 08:58:07 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> > On 16 Dec 2020, at 23:21, Loren Wilton
> > wrote:
> >> I just got a batch of spams containing
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ... various rules to tag messages as spam when they had content that
> >
On 17 Dec 2020, at 16:19, Dave Wreski wrote:
> On 12/17/20 6:05 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Is there a way with spamassassin local.conf to add a higher score
>> based on source ip address or subnet? Basically the last IP in
>> "Received:" header.
>> bad_subnet_add_20_points: 192.168.240.0/24
>> Raising
