Re: training bayes database

On 08.05.2018 22:08, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote: system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64, spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: required_hits 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject

Re: training bayes database

On 09.05.18 9:57, Matthew Broadhead wrote: BAYES_00=-1.9 I've personally set *bayes_sql_override_username = amavis* in my local.cf If at all possible, run amavisd with SA bayes debug to see if/how it's using the database. Good luck, Reio

Re: training bayes database

> On 9 May 2018, at 18:33, John Hardin wrote: > > Also: > >> On Wed, 9 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> >> your message has >> >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.15 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 > > Setting the threshold higher will result in more spam getting

Re: Mysterious false positives in inbox

Wild stab - maybe they're entering the system already with ***SPAM*** in the subject? With amavisd-new it's amavisd that modifies the subject, local.cf shouldn't have an effect on that. Good luck, Reio On 09.05.18 14:02, Eggert Ehmke wrote: Hello, I have spamassassin 3.4.1 / amavisd /

Re: training bayes database

On 09.05.18 16:59, Matthew Broadhead wrote: setting log_level and sa_debug in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf didn't seem to make any difference. should i be doing it in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf? See if $sa_debug=1 works (for full debug)? (and restart amavisd). Reio ok now i am getting a

Re: training bayes database

On 09.05.18 16:33, Matthew Broadhead wrote: On 08/05/18 21:53, Reio Remma wrote: On 08.05.2018 22:08, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote: system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64, spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch

Re: training bayes database

On 10.05.18 15:23, David Jones wrote: On 05/10/2018 07:12 AM, Reio Remma wrote: On 10.05.18 15:08, David Jones wrote: On 05/10/2018 07:02 AM, Reio Remma wrote: On a slightly related note. We're running a PFSense firewall with DNS Forwarder (dnsmasq) in front of our mail server. From what I've

Re: training bayes database

On 10.05.18 14:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead: i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need to set up dns relay on my machine so it comes from my ip? there is no way we send more than 500k emails from our domain so i should

Re: training bayes database

On 10.05.18 15:08, David Jones wrote: On 05/10/2018 07:02 AM, Reio Remma wrote: On 10.05.18 14:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead: i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need to set up dns relay on my machine so it comes from my

FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD via IMAP.

Hello! I just noticed if I mail myself via my Gmail account, I'm hitting FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD. Apparently it happens only if I use my Gmail account via IMAP, but not when I mailed from their webmail for testing. Should that be so? I suspect it's the following that trips it: Return-Path:

Re: FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD via IMAP.

On 10.05.2018 22:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 10.05.2018 um 21:11 schrieb Reio Remma: Apparently it happens only if I use my Gmail account via IMAP, but not when I mailed from their webmail for testing. you don't send with IMAP - it's SMTP Indeed, I realized my mistake right after posting

Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

Hello! I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam score. Is that normal? bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam is set to a negative figure in the SpamAssassin config file. X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.32 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32 tagged_above=-3

Re: Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

> On 12 Jun 2018, at 17:11, Bill Cole > wrote: > >> On 12 Jun 2018, at 3:34, Reio Remma wrote: >> I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam score. Is >> that normal? >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> X-Spam-Score: 2.32 >> X-Sp

A question about DCC and learning.

Hello! I'm curious, if I turn on DCC learning, does it learn with both the learn and report options to sa-learn or only report? Thanks! Reio

Re: Invalid argumenty warning when trying to use Bayes with Redis

On 27.05.2018 21:43, John Hardin wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2018, Palvelin Postmaster wrote: Can anyone offer suggestions as to why I get these invalid argument warnings when I run spamassassin —lint —debug: warn: plugin: eval failed: bayes: Redis failed: Error: Invalid argument at

Re: Periodic error

On 02.08.18 3:46, Amir Caspi wrote: On Aug 1, 2018, at 6:09 PM, John Hardin wrote: Recommendation: download the spamassassin-3.4.1-12 (or later) SRPM from Fedora and try building an RPM from it in a Centos 6 dev environment. That's what I did for Centos 7 and it works jes' fine. Kevin Fenzi

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

On 17.04.18 16:16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: It was squashed by the pmc when the ruleqa was broken but happy to say it's in progress again and I will have an rc building again soon. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 09:13 Reio Remma <r...@mrstuudio.ee <mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee>> wrote:

SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

Greetings, any new on 3.4.2 release? I read that testing was done a year ago, but everything is silent after that. :) Thanks! Reio

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: Permission denied

Are you running both commands as the same user? Reio On 18.04.2018 23:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote: That was also my first guess, but it seems not the be the case here alll dirs are 755 and the file 644: rd@netcup:~$ locate SpamCop.pm /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm

spamc --reporttype= not working and curious log message.

ype=report in 3.4.1. I'm also curious about a log message when reporting: spamd[9506]: spamd: handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: '' -- Tervitades Reio Remma MR Stuudio 25 aastat *MR Stuudio OÜ* Tondi 17b, 11316, Tallinn Tel +372 650 4808 Mob +372 56 22 00 33 r...@mrstuudio

Re: spamc --reporttype= not working and curious log message.

On 19.04.18 9:45, Reio Remma wrote: Hello! I'm trying to use this to report spam: spamc --reporttype=report --username=amavis < mail However all I get is: spamc[9632]: Please specify a legal report type It works if I omit the = after --reporttype. This is with SA 3.4.2 from SVN, i

Re: spamc --reporttype= not working and curious log message.

On 20.04.18 9:50, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 04/19/18 09:24, Reio Remma wrote: [...] *Update:* none of the --option= switches work. handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: '' is caused because I have the -username switch as --username=amavis instead of --username amavis It worked in 3.4.1

Re: spamc --reporttype= not working and curious log message.

On 20.04.18 9:50, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 04/19/18 09:24, Reio Remma wrote: [...] *Update:* none of the --option= switches work. handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: '' is caused because I have the -username switch as --username=amavis instead of --username amavis It worked in 3.4.1

Re: spamc --reporttype= not working and curious log message.

pache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Reio Remma <r...@mrstuudio.ee <mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee>> wrote: On 19.04.18 9:45, Reio Remma wrote: Hello! I'm trying

Re: spamc --reporttype= not working and curious log message.

ache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Reio Remma <r...@mrstuudio.ee <mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee>> wrote: On 20.04.18 9:50, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 04/19/18 09:24, Reio Remma wrote: [...]

Re: spamc --reporttype= not working and curious log message.

Assassin Project > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail <https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail> - 703.798.0171 > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Reio Remma <r...@mrstuudio.ee <mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee> <mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee <mailto:r...@mrstuudio.e

Re: SpamAssassin 3.4.2.

Mkay. Half an evening of figuring out how RPM building works and voila. Let the testing commence. :) Running transaction   Updating   : spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.centos.x86_64   Cleanup    : spamassassin-3.4.1-17.el7.centos.x86_64   Verifying  : spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.centos.x86_64   Verifying 

Extreme scores from FRNAME rules.

Hello! I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these three rules. * 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority * 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject * 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in message + short or no subject If it wasn't

Re: Extreme scores from FRNAME rules.

On 25/10/2018 14:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 25/10/2018 11:43, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: bug number would help more... On 25.10.18 10:58, Reio Remma wrote: The bug contains no additional info. :) I was simply asked to post

Re: Extreme scores from FRNAME rules.

On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 22.10.18 21:34, Reio Remma wrote: I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these three rules. *  2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority *  2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject

Re: Extreme scores from FRNAME rules.

On 25/10/2018 11:43, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: bug number would help more... On 25.10.18 10:58, Reio Remma wrote: The bug contains no additional info. :) I was simply asked to post to the list. and this is exactly why it would

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On 16.09.2018 18:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Good Morning, On behalf of the Apache SpamAssassin Project Management Committee, I am very pleased to announce the release of Apache SpamAssassin v3.4.2. This release contains security bug fixes.  A security announcement will follow within the next

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.2 available

On 17.09.2018 4:13, Ricky Gutierrez wrote: Reio hi, Could you please share the rpm o src for centOS? Download link @WeTransfer: https://we.tl/t-CbvKhwJoCA spamassassin-3.4.2-0.el7.x86_64.rpm Will be deleted on 24 September, 2018. Good luck, Reio

Re: Scoring TLS.

On 06/09/2019 09:57, @lbutlr wrote: On 6 Sep 2019, at 00:51, Reio Remma wrote: Even though I recall QMail having TLSv1 back when we were still using it. TLSv1.0 is EOLed and should not be used nor supported. But yes, mailing lists are therein reason I a=have not gone 100% TLS myself (it’s

Scoring TLS.

Hello! I recently did an experiment where I stopped accepting incoming e-mail without TLS. This seemingly cut off about 95-99% of spam. Unfortunately there still seem to be a small percentage of servers sending without TLS, so that was a no go. Now I've instead turned to SpamAssassin to

Re: Scoring TLS.

On 06/09/2019 10:57, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 6 Sep 2019, at 00:51, Reio Remma wrote: Even though I recall QMail having TLSv1 back when we were still using it. On 06.09.19 00:57, @lbutlr wrote: TLSv1.0 is EOLed and should not be used nor supported. well, if your clients (some old

Re: Scoring TLS.

On 06/09/2019 15:53, RW wrote: On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:51:06 +0300 Reio Remma wrote: Hello! I recently did an experiment where I stopped accepting incoming e-mail without TLS. This seemingly cut off about 95-99% of spam. Unfortunately there still seem to be a small percentage of servers sending

Re: Scoring TLS.

On 06/09/2019 15:25, RW wrote: On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 10:17:23 +0300 Reio Remma wrote: On 06/09/2019 09:57, @lbutlr wrote: On 6 Sep 2019, at 00:51, Reio Remma wrote: Even though I recall QMail having TLSv1 back when we were still using it. TLSv1.0 is EOLed and should not be used nor supported

Re: Where to find the highest version to be installed by "yum"?

On 27.09.2019 21:37, Ramon F Herrera wrote: On 9/27/2019 12:38 PM, Amir Caspi wrote: On Sep 27, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Bowie Bailey > wrote: Question: Are you folks aware of any 'yum' repository that carries a version higher than 3.3.1? I'm not aware of any