>surely, it makes no sense blow up the database with already 100%
>classified samples - you even don't do that uncnditional with a
>hand-trained database (at least not forever, at the begin it makes sense
>to get additional tokens)
I think you misunderstood my question. I meant that as I look at
>you need to train your bayes *by hand* to start with - how do you expect
>bayes classification with no hints afetr purge the database - train 200
>ham and spam mails and *after that* look further
Reindl:
Thanks. I want to use some auto-training with very conservative thresholds
set. All of
Centos7
Postfix 3.2.2
Amavisd-new 2.11.0
Spamassassin 3.4.0
Site-wide configuration
This is a new box and I've configured some conservative values for auto-learn.
I've enabled it properly AFAIK, but I can't see any sign of it working.
I have these set in local.cf
use_bayes 1
> I currently add bayes token information and relay information as headers to
> each msg processed. Especially relay information can be helpful ex if you
> have a script that parses received headers. With such headers thats much more
> easy, just look for the first untrusted hop
Tobi: Thank
