Re: [OT] Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote: Microsoft shits on your head, and you pay for it. Go on, enjoy it. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 17:19, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 10.04.2018 um 17:17 schrieb Rupert Gallagher: > Microsoft should be blacklisted globally, until they

Re: [OT] Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

Microsoft shits on your head, and you pay for it. Go on, enjoy it. Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 17:19, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 10.04.2018 um 17:17 schrieb Rupert Gallagher: > Microsoft should be > blacklisted globally, until they fix their >

Re: [OT] Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

>Microsoft should be blacklisted globally, until they fix their own software.  They even change the order of many headers (Receiveds included) remove the ones they do not like, etc... i am sure they like playing dices... PedroD

Re: [OT] Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

Microsoft should be blacklisted globally, until they fix their own software. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 16:00, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > Hence why I have to have a local whitelist and skip verification for all MX's > of the form *.outlook.com (which include Microsoft cloud

[OT] Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On 10/04/18 08:41, Daniele Duca wrote: On 09/04/2018 20:40, Sebastian Arcus wrote: This might not really answer your question, but I've had really good results leaving all this to the MTA (Exim in my case). I actually go for the whole hog full callout verification - checking with the MX